IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Obama caves to Russians on missle shield
impala454
post Mar 3 2009, 08:30 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6290967.html

Great, so now we're going to rely on the Russians. Hell they're probably helping Iran build missles. I swear a nuke is going to fall somewhere while Obama is president.

75% it's Israel
20% it's us
5% it's some other euro country
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Mar 3 2009, 09:31 AM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



QUOTE (impala454 @ Mar 3 2009, 08:30 AM) *
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6290967.html

Great, so now we're going to rely on the Russians. Hell they're probably helping Iran build missles. I swear a nuke is going to fall somewhere while Obama is president.

75% it's Israel
20% it's us
5% it's some other euro country

Your not giving enough % to brits getting it...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Mar 4 2009, 02:14 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



Ok so heres my question, would you be more in favor of having MAD against a russian government and no missle defense (which is a joke anyway) with russians helping to prevent and islamic country like Iran from getting a nuke, or would you rather have a missle defense grid and Iran having the Bomb because Russia continued to ignore the embargo?

Personally, i think MAD makes missle defenses useless (can't stop them all), and Russia and america against Iran would help shut them down. Of course russia could still give aid, but we could still put missles back. Just assuming a deal like that worked. Which would you be more in favor of?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post Mar 4 2009, 07:38 AM
Post #4


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



i'm in favor of the choice most likely to bring about the apocalypse, but leaves me as one of the survivors


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post Mar 4 2009, 10:39 AM
Post #5


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



Those anti-icbm missiles work, just not enough of them.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Mar 4 2009, 11:17 AM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



QUOTE (chook @ Mar 4 2009, 10:39 AM) *
Those anti-icbm missiles work, just not enough of them.

Yeah, thats kinda what i mean, plus MAD is a back up assurance that a russia of the world wouldn't launch


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Mar 4 2009, 12:02 PM
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



supposedly we have space based missle defenses too, but i say the more the merrier. also dont like seeing the president caving on stuff like this
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
THECHICKEN
post Mar 4 2009, 03:34 PM
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 1,302
Joined: 20-February 07
Member No.: 721



Meh, if we can get the benefit of getting Russia to help in the control of Iran, i don't mind withdrawing things that can be put back if need be.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 05:00 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com