![]() ![]() |
Oct 27 2008, 11:12 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,329 Joined: 20-June 07 Member No.: 1,243 |
When I was driving to work this morning I noticed a bunch of political signs along the side of the road. The usual McCain and local shit, but a few of em bothered me. There were a few signs for Constables and Sheriffs proclaiming their political affiliation.
Partisan politics has no place in officers upholding the law IMO. I don't want constables arresting people or giving them harsher/more lenient punishments based on their political beliefs. Their job should be to uphold the law without bias Does this bother anyone else? -------------------- ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2008, 11:17 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
i never thought about it before, but now that you point it out yeah it bothers me
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2008, 11:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
Same thing with Judges...
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2008, 01:03 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
I shudder to think what kind of filth Obama woild appoint to the supreme court
-------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Oct 27 2008, 02:02 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Oh baby bring me down Group: Agents Posts: 4,115 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Way out yonder Member No.: 68 |
Yeah, I always thought that political parties should be disbanded in the justice department. Even though I don't like it, parties in policy making help get laws through.
-------------------- Southern Rock, beer and bears!
![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 27 2008, 04:05 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2008, 10:30 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
Don't forget about death and the very unlikely possibility of impeachment
Political party affiliation doesn't always matter with judges as far as interpretation of the law goes... Example: Sandra Day Oconnor .... or john paul stevens The later was appointed by Ford but he has been fairly liberal in his interpretation of the law. This post has been edited by The Fanatic: Oct 29 2008, 10:32 AM -------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2008, 05:28 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Oh baby bring me down Group: Agents Posts: 4,115 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Way out yonder Member No.: 68 |
That is true, but look at judges on circuit courts whose appointments are not for life.
-------------------- Southern Rock, beer and bears!
![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:03 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 |
I don't see a problem with it. They declare their affiliation publicly instead of hiding it from the world. They are still lawmen and have a duty to uphold the law without bias. If you feel they're not capable of doing so, then don't vote party lines. Only difference between the elected official and their subordinates is you know the party affiliation of the official while you know nothing of the subordinates - the ones that are out working the streets. No, the elected officials do not always hire based on party affiliation, either.
-------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 02:57 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
-------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 08:32 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 756 Joined: 22-February 06 From: san marcos, tx Member No.: 27 |
you know what's funny to me? I'm not necessarily an Obama supporter and still haven't decided who i am voting for, but aren't the bailouts incredibly socialist? and let's not to mention all the anti-terror laws "for our own good."
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 01:43 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 03:57 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
you know what's funny to me? I'm not necessarily an Obama supporter and still haven't decided who i am voting for, but aren't the bailouts incredibly socialist? and let's not to mention all the anti-terror laws "for our own good." not necessarily. In my opinion, the bailouts are an attempt to save the financial sector in order to keep our somewhat free market. It only deals with finances. Socialism deals with THE PEOPLE... how to make the people equal. Obama wants to spread the wealth. Rescuing (or attempting to) a few banks isn't going to spread the wealth. It's going to hopefully protect people's investments. Socialism has nothing to do with laws that invade privacy either. It's only about equality for the people. Theoretically, that's why neither thing that you said is socialist. In my opinion, socialism isn't necessarily "big government," but almost always is because the programs cost billions upon billions of dollars. Non-socialist governments can spend just as much if not more money building new roads, better schools, etc for the people. I think our current idea of what socialism is is really screwed up. I will say, though, Obama is very socialist by the very most literal meaning of the term.
|
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 04:30 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
not necessarily. In my opinion, the bailouts are an attempt to save the financial sector in order to keep our somewhat free market. It only deals with finances. Socialism deals with THE PEOPLE... Main Entry: so·cial·ism Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\ Function: noun Date: 1837 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods QUOTE I think our current idea of what socialism is is really screwed up. Well then, quit bandwagon-ing your definition of Socialism to fit whatever McCain and Palin espouse. The old Stars-and-Stripes won't be dipped in red paint when Obama is elected. Yes, the definitions of economic systems are in some ways fluid and can adapt over time. But what McCain, Palin, yourself, and others are claiming seems more akin to Communism. Yeah yeah...."Socialism is a stage to Communism"...heard that Marxist quote/tripe many times before. Doesn't seem to be the case in a majority of examples, nor would any such drastic changes EVER take hold/be accepted here in the U.S. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 04:43 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
Main Entry: so·cial·ism Pronunciation: \ˈsō-shə-ˌli-zəm\ Function: noun Date: 1837 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods Well then, quit bandwagon-ing your definition of Socialism to fit whatever McCain and Palin espouse. The old Stars-and-Stripes won't be dipped in red paint when Obama is elected. Yes, the definitions of economic systems are in some ways fluid and can adapt over time. But what McCain, Palin, yourself, and others are claiming seems more akin to Communism. Yeah yeah...."Socialism is a stage to Communism"...heard that Marxist quote/tripe many times before. Doesn't seem to be the case in a majority of examples, nor would any such drastic changes EVER take hold/be accepted here in the U.S. damn, calm down, Zach. Don't get all PO'd because now that you're a Obama follower, you yourself must also be labeled a socialist. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 10:11 AM |