IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> B-2 Crashes in Guam
Hartmann
post Feb 25 2008, 08:38 AM
Post #1





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,402
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml.../wbomber223.xml

Wow! blink.gif

Since the plane is kept aloft by a lot of computers that make sure it is stable, my money is on one of them failing.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Feb 25 2008, 10:08 AM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



this quote points to a computer prob too:
QUOTE
A senior US military source told The Sunday Telegraph that all remaining B-2 stealth bombers were on a "no-fly" order and that there would be no further take-offs until the initial investigation into the crash had been completed.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post Feb 27 2008, 12:35 AM
Post #3


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



They usually ground the same series of a plane. It may be stressed or a computer glitch. As long as they have been flying, I trust the silicon more than the hydraulics.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Feb 27 2008, 09:44 AM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



they still use hydraulics in those things? or you just mean you trust the comps more than the mechanical?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Feb 27 2008, 11:47 AM
Post #5





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,402
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (impala454 @ Feb 27 2008, 09:44 AM) *
they still use hydraulics in those things? or you just mean you trust the comps more than the mechanical?


The specs on the B-2 are mostly classified but I think that most of the control systems are fly-by-wire, meaning an electric motor does the work that the hydraulics would. The only places that this wouldn't apply would be be the landing gear mechanisms.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Feb 27 2008, 12:16 PM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



right, that's what I thought, was just wondering if chuck knew something different
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post Feb 28 2008, 12:05 AM
Post #7


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



I was just thinking that motors would produce too much emf and they would use smaller ones with hydraulics assistance (being directed by wires, but then I know shit about this plane.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 08:17 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com