 November 5th, Ron Paul |
  |
| November 5th, Ron Paul |
 Nov 6 2007, 02:01 AM
Post
#31
|
|
 GORILLA FLUFFER  Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50  |
QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 6 2007, 01:46 AM)  Because Hillary is a lesbian and you are too? http://www.digg.com/politics/Hillary_Clint...ian_Sex_Scandal http://deathby1000papercuts.blogspot.com/2...m-it-would.html http://www.deaddog.com/?p=2817 http://zennie2005.blogspot.com/2007/11/ano...ig-head-dc.html What do you have against Ron Paul? your arguement would have more wieght if your sources had more credibility than the National Inquirer --------------------  QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded. Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!! |
 |
 
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 02:13 AM
Post
#32
|
|
 Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 6 2007, 02:51 AM) Guess you guys aren't Constitutionalists. What's wrong, the constitution not good enough for you? Guess we should scrap it like George Bush and Hillary Clinton want to and just instill a Bush/Clinton Monarchy. If you vote for another Clinton (or Bush) you deserve to be shot (and I'll be the one to pull the trigger). Wow, how anti-Constitution of you Lance. Didn't say I'd vote for Hilary. I just said that the devil-bitch is better than Whacko McDingleberry in comparison. But there you go...putting words in the mouth (or, well...text on the page) of those that think differently than you. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 02:24 AM
Post
#33
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
No other candidate is pro-constitution (besides whomever the Libertarian candidate is) so if you're anti-Ron Paul then by inference you're anti-constitution. Nice try though.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 02:38 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 6 2007, 03:24 AM) No other candidate is pro-constitution (besides whomever the Libertarian candidate is) so if you're anti-Ron Paul then by inference you're anti-constitution. Nice try though. I'm anti-Ron and am not pro- for any other candidate, as far as willing to toss a vote towards ANY of them. They're all douchebag, politician scumbags. Nice try yourself. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 02:41 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
What do you have against Ron Paul, what'd he do... fuck your mom?
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 04:11 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 6 2007, 03:41 AM) What do you have against Ron Paul, what'd he do... fuck your mom? ....and he didn't even send me a birthday card, ever. ='( He's just a candidate that preys on "extremist changers" in society...people that think regressing (disguised as progressing) to x degree will solve all of the country's ills. Spouting deconstructionist propaganda at the masses for the sake of boosting one's ego does NOT a good President make. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 08:21 AM
Post
#37
|
|
 DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
I dont even have a clue who this guy is, but since a bunch of college people support him, he must be a complete retard
-------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 09:51 AM
Post
#38
|
|
 Let's Bother Snape!!! Group: Members Posts: 1,598 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Albuquerque, NM Member No.: 10 |
QUOTE (Psykopath @ Nov 6 2007, 04:11 AM) ....and he didn't even send me a birthday card, ever. ='( He's just a candidate that preys on "extremist changers" in society...people that think regressing (disguised as progressing) to x degree will solve all of the country's ills. Spouting deconstructionist propaganda at the masses for the sake of boosting one's ego does NOT a good President make. What makes a good president then? --------------------  |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 10:13 AM
Post
#39
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28 |
QUOTE (prefix @ Nov 6 2007, 12:41 AM) Does everyone not know anything about ron paul or do they just support him because he's the least douchey of everyone? The man wants to fucking eliminate public education, that means texas tech would go bye bye. This guy could potentially be the worst thing that could ever happen to america. I mean he would get rid of transportation departments, homeland security, the FBI, NSA, CIA, fucking everything. Nut-ball actually you're wrong. he doesn't want to get rid of public education, he wants to get rid of the Department of Education. which by the way, sucks. i think everyone here can acknowledge the fact that America has one of the worst education systems in the world. the fact that he wants to change that is good. i dont know where you get your info from to say that "texas tech would go bye bye." also he said he'd get rid of homeland security, but never said anything about getting rid of the fbi, nsa, cia, or anything else. you're a moron. oh, and homeland security is only a couple years old, and haven't done much anyway. --------------------  |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 10:21 AM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Let's Bother Snape!!! Group: Members Posts: 1,598 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Albuquerque, NM Member No.: 10 |
QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 6 2007, 10:13 AM) actually you're wrong. he doesn't want to get rid of public education, he wants to get rid of the Department of Education. which by the way, sucks. i think everyone here can acknowledge the fact that America has one of the worst education systems in the world. the fact that he wants to change that is good. i dont know where you get your info from to say that "texas tech would go bye bye." also he said he'd get rid of homeland security, but never said anything about getting rid of the fbi, nsa, cia, or anything else. you're a moron. oh, and homeland security is only a couple years old, and haven't done much anyway. No child left behind, what? -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 10:27 AM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 6 2007, 10:13 AM) actually you're wrong. he doesn't want to get rid of public education, he wants to get rid of the Department of Education. which by the way, sucks. i think everyone here can acknowledge the fact that America has one of the worst education systems in the world. the fact that he wants to change that is good. i dont know where you get your info from to say that "texas tech would go bye bye." also he said he'd get rid of homeland security, but never said anything about getting rid of the fbi, nsa, cia, or anything else. you're a moron. oh, and homeland security is only a couple years old, and haven't done much anyway. Yeah, I was about to comment about this. He wants to scale back/eliminate federal involvement in education (i.e. the Department of Education), transitioning the burden of responsibility on state/local government. I admit I don't agree with every one of Dr. Paul's stances, but I've NEVER been 100% in agreement with a candidate. However, I see the overarching theme of his political philosophy, which is scaling back of the government with a great emphasis on personal freedom and personal responsibility. This philosophy certainly can be taken to extremes, but it will be tempered by Congress. I don't believe that Ron Paul would be able to sweep us into an anarchical state any more than Clinton would be able to sweep us into socialism. We currently have a very authoritarian country and we need someone in place to swing the pendulum back the other way. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 10:46 AM
Post
#42
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 926 Joined: 2-May 07 Member No.: 1,015 |
funny I am reading some Chomsky right now, and what he is discussing is the need for our government (in order for democracy to survive) to shift the power from the oligarchy that it is presently to a more populous driven form of government. So to say that it is a regression by doing just that is definitely a point a view, I would view it (and Chomsky would agree) as more of an improvement for the country...
as for the democrats/voting for Hillary, I watch the most recent debate where no major candidate (hillary, obama, edwards) said that they could guarantee withdrawing the troops by the END of their first term as president...I did a double take when I heard that... --------------------  |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 11:21 AM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Let's Bother Snape!!! Group: Members Posts: 1,598 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Albuquerque, NM Member No.: 10 |
lol, good for flopping around like a dead fish.
In other news, Barrack and Edwards took a jab at Clinton. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 12:20 PM
Post
#44
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
QUOTE (blaarg @ Nov 6 2007, 09:46 AM) as for the democrats/voting for Hillary, I watch the most recent debate where no major candidate (hillary, obama, edwards) said that they could guarantee withdrawing the troops by the END of their first term as president...I did a double take when I heard that... shocking to anyone who actually believed them -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2007, 01:41 PM
Post
#45
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
QUOTE (Watchman @ Nov 6 2007, 01:51 AM) Guess you guys aren't Constitutionalists. What's wrong, the constitution not good enough for you? Guess we should scrap it like George Bush and Hillary Clinton want to and just instill a Bush/Clinton Monarchy. If you vote for another Clinton (or Bush) you deserve to be shot (and I'll be the one to pull the trigger). Right.... I'll be waiting rambo -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th November 2026 - 08:01 PM |
