![]() ![]() |
Oct 8 2007, 08:35 AM
Post
#61
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
is there some unofficial list for this? i've seen both of them on a few watch lists. mark may said saturday morning before gameday that harrel was his number 2. i'm shocked that colt brennan is still being mentioned after throwing 5 int in one game against 1AA.
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 08:41 AM
Post
#62
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
I hate to say it but no tech QB or reciever will ever get a heisman with our current offense. Kliff came the closest, but that's only because he was the first QB in our system. Don't get me wrong I love Leach's system, it's hella fun to watch, but you don't see it taken seriously all that often. It seems to be making inroads at a few other schools and you see hints of it in the NFL, but it's still widely considered gimmicky.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 08:56 AM
Post
#63
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
What are these people wanting then? The offense wins games. Yeah, we lose a few, but at least we don't run every chance we get or make it a battle of defenses ('cause yeah, that's fun to watch
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:01 AM
Post
#64
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
Well of course, I agree. It's just that 6,000 yds doesn't look as impressive when you throw 85 times /game. 200 yds + 3 TDs doesn't look as impressive when you throw for 600 with 5 TDs. I mean, it's impressive to me, but it's still a product of the system. That's why Kliff was in the heisman running back in his day. What he did hadn't been done before. But when the next several Tech QBs all get insane numbers, it doesn't help our cause (in the heisman area anyhow). I do hear a lot of good media press on Crabtree though, I just think as far as heisman goes he'll probably just end up referred to as another product of the system. He'll have to bring up insane numbers for us in order to get noticed for the heisman.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:02 AM
Post
#65
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28 |
believe me, Harrell will get attention ONLY when we start winning. and i mean winning more than we have in the past. 1 or 2 loses only. taking the big 12 south, etc.
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:12 AM
Post
#66
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,329 Joined: 20-June 07 Member No.: 1,243 |
I don't get why Colt Brennan is a Heisman candidate but Harrell isn't. Same offense, same numbers, and at least Harrell plays on national tv occasionally. Oh, it's cause people knew who Colt Brennan was before the season started
That could change big time when Tech plays UT. Use what you hate to your advantage - The media is all over UT's jock and if TTU beats em it will be seen as a much bigger win than it actually is. -------------------- ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:26 AM
Post
#67
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
the problem is we'll have more than likely already lost to mizzou. if we can beat mizzou on the road I think we have a serious shot at the big 12 south.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 01:19 PM
Post
#68
|
|
![]() KP Group: Members Posts: 146 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 45 |
Mizzou and Colorado will be a close game for us.
I think we will trample aTm and UT. We will probably lose to OU but this also depends on how we perform against mizzou and colorado. If we win both by big margin, we have a chance at beating OU. -------------------- www.twitter.com/qhfxm
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 02:30 PM
Post
#69
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
If our defense really has drastically improved this much in two weeks I wanna know why it took so freakin long to fire Lyle?
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 03:20 PM
Post
#70
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,795 Joined: 29-September 06 Member No.: 327 |
well we haven't really been challenged yet.
the first test will be this weekend. |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 03:21 PM
Post
#71
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 885 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Lubbock, Texas Member No.: 12 |
If our defense really has drastically improved this much in two weeks I wanna know why it took so freakin long to fire Lyle? i think they didnt want to seem insensitive firing a guy under contract that was having major health issues with his wife. I think they should have reassigned him way earlier if that was the case |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 03:26 PM
Post
#72
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
well you could argue that okie state shouldn't have been a challenge either.
business is business. shoulda been done a long time ago. or lyle shoulda had the balls to step down or reassign himself. hopefully it's fixed now. i was looking at ncaa stats and we actually have better overall defensive numbers than a&m. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 09:33 PM
Post
#73
|
|
|
I was raised on the dairy, BITCH! Group: Members Posts: 3,080 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cedar Park Member No.: 49 |
a&m will be a good test for our D...i'm concerned though...the game will be tough
texas will roll us mizzou will roll us oklahomo will roll us -------------------- "Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 11:02 PM
Post
#74
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28 |
if we can beat mizzou on the road I think we have a serious shot at the big 12 fixed -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2007, 11:13 PM
Post
#75
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
a&m will be a good test for our D...i'm concerned though...the game will be tough nah... we'll roll them. if it was in college station i'd worry a little, but they suck on the road. and have had close calls with crap teams like fresno (at home even) texas will roll us did you see how bad their secondary was getting beat? don't get me wrong i don't think it's a lock, but honestly they aren't that good this year. mizzou will roll us i think this will be a tough game but i don't think they'll beat us that bad if they do. they haven't faced a pass offense the likes of ours yet. and they themselves are a passing team. the only thing that worries me w/them is they seem to have a fairly mobile QB, but hey we got our 'refreshed' defense... we'll see how they do. oklahomo will roll us well the game is in lubbock, and if we come into it 10-1 or even 9-2, it's a whole different ball game. fixed shit... have you seen the north this year??? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd September 2026 - 01:22 PM |