Jul 7 2007, 09:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
I found this to be interesting....
http://www.psychologytoday.com/artic...622-000002.xml However, this particular part of the article kinda fuels my thought about how sociologists are generally idiots: Quote: Relative to monogamy, polygyny creates greater fitness variance (the distance between the "winners" and the "losers" in the reproductive game) among males than among females because it allows a few males to monopolize all the females in the group. The greater fitness variance among males creates greater pressure for men to compete with each other for mates. Only big and tall males can win mating opportunities. Among pair-bonding species like humans, in which males and females stay together to raise their children, females also prefer to mate with big and tall males because they can provide better physical protection against predators and other males. That is the biggest pile of horse shit I've ever heard. If that was the case I'd get laid so much it'd just be fucking retarded -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Dogmeat 10 Politically Incorrect Truths about Human Nature Jul 7 2007, 09:36 PM
1up I interpret the word big as muscular... not fat.
... Jul 7 2007, 09:59 PM
Dogmeat QUOTE (1up @ Jul 7 2007, 09:59 PM) I inte... Jul 7 2007, 10:05 PM
impala454 QUOTE This page has moved
You've reached this... Jul 7 2007, 10:32 PM
Testm0nkey women when on their periods are more prone to seek... Jul 7 2007, 10:42 PM
Dogmeat QUOTE (Testm0nkey @ Jul 7 2007, 10:42 PM)... Jul 7 2007, 11:28 PM
impala454 someone wanna quote the thing? I still get ... Jul 7 2007, 11:58 PM
Rocky real link :
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articl... Jul 8 2007, 09:13 AM
Timbo This is so old hat.
Evolutionary Psychology. Iss... Jul 10 2007, 12:24 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 08:25 AM |