IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Star Trek XI officially announced, To be released in December of 2008
Aaron
post Feb 27 2007, 05:15 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



J.J. Abrams, creator of Lost and Alias, is directing and producing. Apparently it will be a complete re-boot of the franchise, a la Batman Begins and Superman Returns.

Below is an excerpt from an IGN Movies article that confirms rumors that Matt Damon, Adrien Brody and Gary Sinise are in talks to star in the movie.

http://movies.ign.com/articles/767/767783p1.html

QUOTE
Confirming rumors that have been making the rounds for some months now, IGN has learned that Oscar winner Matt Damon is indeed in talks with Paramount about playing the role of Jim Kirk, previously immortalized onscreen by Emmy winner William Shatner.

Damon brings star power and an acting pedigree to the role that should convince audiences that this is a serious reboot of the beloved franchise.

For the part of Kirk's Vulcan first officer Mr. Spock, IGN has been told that none other than Oscar winner Adrien Brody (King Kong, The Pianist) is in talks with Paramount to play the role. If cast, Brody would succeed Leonard Nimoy in a role that forever marked Nimoy's career. But with a Best Actor award already under his belt and an eclectic mix of films on his resume, Brody wouldn't have as much to lose by taking on the iconic role as Nimoy had.

IGN has also been told that Oscar nominee Gary Sinise -- currently seen on the small screen in CSI: NY -- is in talks for the role of Dr. McCoy, the ornery and politically incorrect ship's physician aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise. McCoy's prickly relationship with Spock was the basis of much of the humor and humanity of the original 1960s series. The late DeForrest Kelley played "Bones" on TV.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Feb 27 2007, 05:19 PM
Post #2


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



Why?!?!?!?!?!


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Feb 27 2007, 06:06 PM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



Paramount's Chairman and CEO was quoted in the press release, saying that "the revival of the Star Trek franchise is an important part of Paramount’s turnaround."

Considering how much money the franchise has made over the years, it really shouldn't come as a shock that Paramount is going back to the well.

A Salon article in 1999 estimated that the Star Trek franchise had, up to that point, generated $2.3 billion in TV revenues, over $1 billion in movie revenues and $4 billion in revenues from merchandise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogmeat
post Feb 27 2007, 08:13 PM
Post #4


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



god fucking dammit.

I don't wanna see a pre-TNG star trek movie, I want them to make a TNG/DS9/Voyager-based movie that DOESNT SUCK .... god dammit.


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Feb 27 2007, 08:17 PM
Post #5


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



OMG, let's jump on the remake wagon!!!


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Feb 27 2007, 09:47 PM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



Reboot and remake are different things.

The term "reboot" typically only applies to stories/franchises with established continuity - this continuity does not have to be film-based. A good example of this would be Batman (1989) and Batman Begins (2005). The characters are the same, there are similar elements, but the stories are different and they begin a new continuity. Other examples of reboots are Superman Returns (2006), Casino Royale (2006) and Planet of the Apes (2001).

Remakes, however, are usually a re-interpretation of a single, previously established, story. A good example of this would be Ocean's Eleven (2001) and Ocean's Eleven (1960), or King Kong (2005) and King Kong (1933).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
False Dude
post Feb 27 2007, 10:19 PM
Post #7


POTATO OLES


Group: Members
Posts: 1,602
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Newark, NJ
Member No.: 17



OMG, let's jump on the reboot wagon!!!



I read that Matt Damon is going to be Captain Kirk and Adrien Brody as Spock.


--------------------
death to false dudes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Feb 27 2007, 10:47 PM
Post #8


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



I suppose if they are going to cast someone as Captain Kirk, Matt Damon isn't a bad choice. I'll reserve judgement on this movie until I see it.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zetec
post Feb 27 2007, 11:29 PM
Post #9


Retired Funk-bringer


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,656
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Dallas
Member No.: 14



dude you realize this news is over a year old? i mean, damn, man.

and damon has long ago been out of the running for kirk.

shatner and nimoy have been confirmed for the movie, but not necessarily for their old roles.


--------------------
WAIT. I'm not finished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Feb 27 2007, 11:30 PM
Post #10


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



i hope there's a tragic accident on the first day of filming!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
False Dude
post Feb 27 2007, 11:31 PM
Post #11


POTATO OLES


Group: Members
Posts: 1,602
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Newark, NJ
Member No.: 17



man I need to get up on my Star Trek news. damn


--------------------
death to false dudes
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Feb 28 2007, 03:54 AM
Post #12


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (zetec @ Feb 27 2007, 11:29 PM) *
dude you realize this news is over a year old? i mean, damn, man.

and damon has long ago been out of the running for kirk.

shatner and nimoy have been confirmed for the movie, but not necessarily for their old roles.


Yes, but this is the first time it's been announced by Paramount. And it appears that Damon WILL be Kirk.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pysex
post Feb 28 2007, 09:03 AM
Post #13


I was raised on the dairy, BITCH!


Group: Members
Posts: 3,080
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Cedar Park
Member No.: 49



The one thing you have to understand....even though it's a "reboot" of the saga..it's been played out. Audiences have been burned with all the TNG movies they spewed on us that pretty much caused the franchise to stall. Oh yeah....can't fail to mention the new series that makes absolutely no sense. Pre captain kirk? WITH LCD SCREENS and touch controls? Yeah...an amazing leap they made to talking computers and flip switches.




http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/news...icle/45415.html
QUOTE
02.27.2007
Christmas Day 2008 Release for "Star Trek XI"

The next motion picture of the Star Trek franchise, tentatively titled "Star Trek XI," will begin filming this fall for theatrical release on Christmas Day 2008.
The official announcement was made today by Paramount Pictures. Last Friday J.J. Abrams, already announced as producer of the project, finalized a deal to also direct the movie (related story). The screenplay, which reportedly will be a prequel revolving around a young James T. Kirk and Mr. Spock, has been written by Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci, who previously collaborated with Abrams on "Mission Impossible III." Kurtzman and Orci will executive produce with Bryan Burk, and Abrams will produce along with Lost co-creator Damon Lindelof.

"If there's something I'm dying to see, it's the brilliance and optimism of [Gene] Roddenberry's world brought back to the big screen," said Abrams. "Alex and Bob wrote an amazing script that embraces and respects Trek canon, but charts its own course. Our goal is to make a picture for everyone — life-long fans and the uninitiated. Needless to say, I am honored and excited to be part of this next chapter of Star Trek."

Brad Grey, chairman and CEO of Paramount Pictures, said, "We could not be more thrilled to be back in business with J.J. Abrams. The revival of the Star Trek franchise is an important part of Paramount's turnaround."


--------------------
"Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zetec
post Feb 28 2007, 09:30 AM
Post #14


Retired Funk-bringer


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,656
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Dallas
Member No.: 14



1 exception: Star Trek: First Contact fucking ROCKED.

As far as the touchscreens and shit goes, there was an episode of Enterprise where the mirror universe crew (on which the entire 2-part episode centered -- no good universe crew at all) encountered a constitution class ship from the (good) future -- dorky controls and all. They eventually even changed into the classic TOS uniforms. It was an incredible homage, and they basically made the "less advanced" controls canonically more advanced.


Really cool episode, one of the last of the 4th season, and proof that ENT had finally started to get it right, RIGHT before they were canned :/


--------------------
WAIT. I'm not finished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pysex
post Feb 28 2007, 10:00 AM
Post #15


I was raised on the dairy, BITCH!


Group: Members
Posts: 3,080
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Cedar Park
Member No.: 49



First Contact was a good movie. I liked Generations just a little bit more.


--------------------
"Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th August 2026 - 05:23 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com