IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Day of Infamy
jonathan83
post Dec 8 2006, 12:06 PM
Post #16





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Dec 8 2006, 09:59 AM) *
"Work" has changed meanings. It used to mean being out in the field, working on a highrise building, or some other manual labor. Now it means sitting in a cube

sorry to break it to ya, but this is reality all over the world. Times change, jobs change.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Dec 8 2006, 12:07 PM
Post #17





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



haha and no offense to hartmann, bc i usually agree with him and he seems cool. but this is what seems to happen in threads with cupcake.

Cupcake: "blah blah something about war or guns or military or some deep political thought"
Hartmann: I totally agree.

This post has been edited by jonathan83: Dec 8 2006, 12:08 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Dec 8 2006, 12:08 PM
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Dec 8 2006, 12:06 PM) *
sorry to break it to ya, but this is reality all over the world. Times change, jobs change.

there's no way in hell the people who wish us dead are as fat and spoiled as we are.

you can't possibly make that argument.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Dec 8 2006, 01:08 PM
Post #19





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Dec 8 2006, 12:07 PM) *
haha and no offense to hartmann, bc i usually agree with him and he seems cool. but this is what seems to happen in threads with cupcake.

Cupcake: "blah blah something about war or guns or military or some deep political thought"
Hartmann: I totally agree.


Mostly because Cupcake and I agree and I have other points to add onto what he said. Threads don't always have to be:

Someone: I'm right.
Someone2: No, I'm right.
Someone: I'm right more than you.
Someone2: No, I more right than you.
Someone3: I am more right than everyone.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Dec 8 2006, 01:26 PM
Post #20





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Dec 8 2006, 12:07 PM) *
haha and no offense to hartmann, bc i usually agree with him and he seems cool. but this is what seems to happen in threads with cupcake.

Cupcake: "blah blah something about war or guns or military or some deep political thought"
Hartmann: I totally agree.


wow you're kind of a dick?

some people agree on things. crazy! I agree with others on here a lot and say so. doesn't make me some yes-man or patsy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Dec 8 2006, 01:38 PM
Post #21


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (cupcake @ Dec 8 2006, 09:36 AM) *
live in your utopian 'americans are the end-all badasses' dreamworld...and I'll live in reality. I'm sure yours is much more palatable and cozy. I bet you sleep well.

modern-day americans* are pampered snots who would rather pick apart every little flaw a leader, decision, action makes, be interested in conspiracy theories, etc... than actually pull their boots up and endure the hardships to do what needs to be done.

this isn't a political party thing. this is an american thing. the reps talk out both sides of their mouths, led us into an ill-advised situation, and never fully committed to stomping a mudhole in anyone; whereas the dems just whined and poked at the policy, thus weakening us further, and now they have the motherloving GALL to suggest diplomacy AFTER we already created our enemies. and rest assured, the guys we are fighting right now are not the same guys who wanted us dead in 2001.


You talk like America was any different during WWII or any other war. In fact, America was probably less willing to fight a war then. Both FDR and Wilson ran on platforms that they wouldn't get America involved in either World War, and that's what won the elections for them. It wasn't until Pearl Harbor or the sinking of the Lusitania that the majority of the country wanted to get involved. Nowadays, we get involved in wars over the most minor things.

This post has been edited by pebkac: Dec 8 2006, 01:39 PM


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Dec 8 2006, 01:47 PM
Post #22





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



I just...what the?

I'm talking about Americans having more resolve and fortitude back then. I don't recall ever saying anything about "wanting to go to war". But when pushed, the didn't tippy-toe or be PC or political about it. They obviously banded together for the common good and took care of business.

That hasn't happened since...and we've only grown more PC and divided. Have we not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Billy
post Dec 8 2006, 02:32 PM
Post #23


N 0 t h i n g


Group: Members
Posts: 1,449
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 54



It does not matter how weak the people of a country are. Technology is what decides victory in battle. America is top of the line when it comes to military technology. This is why we only lost a few hundred troops to Saddams hundreds of thousands in the initial front against him*. It is not because our troops are these elite killing machines. No, they are well equipped, and well trained to use that equipment.

The only way America will ever fall is if other countries who want us dead are able to figure out how to develop the things we have. But unfortunately, they don't know what we have (and neither does 99% of those living in America). So it's difficult to catch up when you aren't sure what you're trying to catch up to.

*for the idiots who lack reading comprehension, yes, I know we have lost 3000 troops total, but most of those were post occupation.


--------------------


QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:22 PM) *
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Dec 8 2006, 02:37 PM
Post #24





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Renegadepeon @ Dec 8 2006, 02:32 PM) *
It does not matter how weak the people of a country are. Technology is what decides victory in battle. America is top of the line when it comes to military technology. This is why we only lost a few hundred troops to Saddams hundreds of thousands in the initial front against him*. It is not because our troops are these elite killing machines. No, they are well equipped, and well trained to use that equipment.

The only way America will ever fall is if other countries who want us dead are able to figure out how to develop the things we have. But unfortunately, they don't know what we have (and neither does 99% of those living in America). So it's difficult to catch up when you aren't sure what you're trying to catch up to.

*for the idiots who lack reading comprehension, yes, I know we have lost 3000 troops total, but most of those were post occupation.


Tactics had a lot to do with it as well.

Men have to man the technology and without them the technology is useless (unless of course "they" become self-aware).


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Dec 8 2006, 02:56 PM
Post #25


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (cupcake @ Dec 8 2006, 01:47 PM) *
I just...what the?

I'm talking about Americans having more resolve and fortitude back then. I don't recall ever saying anything about "wanting to go to war". But when pushed, the didn't tippy-toe or be PC or political about it. They obviously banded together for the common good and took care of business.

That hasn't happened since...and we've only grown more PC and divided. Have we not?


You're probably right, but WWII is an exceptional case. It's a lot easier to unite a nation when facing the bloodiest war in human history with arguably one of the most charismatic leaders in our history than it is to unite them under a war in the middle of nowhere under a leader who has the people skills of a used condom.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seussninja
post Dec 8 2006, 03:19 PM
Post #26


FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK


Group: Members
Posts: 1,673
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 11



and now we're just glad that Japan is our comic relief for the world.

Oh, Japan, is there anything you WONT turn into a sexual fantasy?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post Dec 8 2006, 04:57 PM
Post #27


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Seussninja @ Dec 8 2006, 03:19 PM) *
and now we're just glad that Japan is our comic relief for the world.

Oh, Japan, is there anything you WONT turn into a sexual fantasy?




yes.



























YOU


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Dec 8 2006, 08:15 PM
Post #28





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (cupcake @ Dec 8 2006, 09:36 AM) *
live in your utopian 'americans are the end-all badasses' dreamworld...and I'll live in reality. I'm sure yours is much more palatable and cozy. I bet you sleep well.

modern-day americans* are pampered snots who would rather pick apart every little flaw a leader, decision, action makes, be interested in conspiracy theories, etc... than actually pull their boots up and endure the hardships to do what needs to be done.

this isn't a political party thing. this is an american thing. the reps talk out both sides of their mouths, led us into an ill-advised situation, and never fully committed to stomping a mudhole in anyone; whereas the dems just whined and poked at the policy, thus weakening us further, and now they have the motherloving GALL to suggest diplomacy AFTER we already created our enemies. and rest assured, the guys we are fighting right now are not the same guys who wanted us dead in 2001.

Diplomacy...FUCK YEAH!

americans today do not have the patience to wait for their hotpocket to finish nuking, nor do they have the stomach or fortitude to endure a battle of attrition. If we cannot deal with it in Iraq (where we've lost 3000 men over 3 years), HOW IN THE HELL can you justify that we'd be cool with the slaughterous nature of the big WWII battles? We couldn't...

there's no way in hell we could deal with the threat of the (equivalent of) axis powers today. like say if china, russia and NK decided fuck it, let's get it on! heaven help us.

*disclaimer...as with all things there are anomalies. there are still americans who are of the 'hardman' mindset and will, but definately not the popular majority...nor in the political corps.

you and hartmann don't get it here... you're calling the american population fat & lazy and unwilling to do hard work. what you don't seem to understand here is hard work of the past is obsolete. whereas my great grandfather may have had to do some physically difficult task on his WWII navy ship, now a computer and a machine do it. and you know where that computer & machine came from? the fat lazy americans sitting at computers all day.

wars aren't about who has the most men anymore, they're all about technology. and when it comes to technology our military forces are un-matched. i dunno how anyone would think otherwise. sure it'd be a tough war to invade NK or china, but I'm not talking about that I'm saying our mainland is essentially untouchable by conventional warfare.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Dec 8 2006, 08:49 PM
Post #29





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (impala454 @ Dec 8 2006, 08:15 PM) *
you and hartmann don't get it here... you're calling the american population fat & lazy and unwilling to do hard work. what you don't seem to understand here is hard work of the past is obsolete. whereas my great grandfather may have had to do some physically difficult task on his WWII navy ship, now a computer and a machine do it. and you know where that computer & machine came from? the fat lazy americans sitting at computers all day.

wars aren't about who has the most men anymore, they're all about technology. and when it comes to technology our military forces are un-matched. i dunno how anyone would think otherwise. sure it'd be a tough war to invade NK or china, but I'm not talking about that I'm saying our mainland is essentially untouchable by conventional warfare.


Yes, technology wins it all, yet our troops turn to silly string to make sure it's safe to enter a room.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Dec 8 2006, 09:22 PM
Post #30


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Dec 8 2006, 08:49 PM) *
Yes, technology wins it all, yet our troops turn to silly string to make sure it's safe to enter a room.

which points out the problem of who the decision makers are. technology is key, yes, but when you've got morons in charge (or smart people making the wrong decisions, or both), you're no better than the other guy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th August 2026 - 05:12 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com