![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#46
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 ![]() |
It's SLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O OOOOOOW again! Two mins to load a page ![]() Even though this: 9.7860 sec -- 10 queries GZIP Enabled -------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#47
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 ![]() |
well the 9 sec is just the time it took at the server to run the queries (which is terrible). for ten queries that number should be sub second at least.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#48
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 ![]() |
Yeah, but shouldn't the queries be the bottleneck? Not whatever else is?
-------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#49
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 ![]() |
well they're part of it. that time at the bottom of the page is how long from the time the php.exe sent the request to the time it recieved the response. the rest of the lag on the site is the web server's CPU time getting eaten. it will rarely be bandwidth problems when it's a php or ASP.NET page (i.e. server side stuff) that's slow. usually these service providers will throw 50-100 different accounts on one small web server, and all it takes is one jackass who doesn't know what he's doing to eat the server alive.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th September 2025 - 01:59 PM |