IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


10 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> pentagon crash video, released
pebkac
post May 18 2006, 10:24 AM
Post #121


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (Lancifer @ May 18 2006, 08:59 AM)
If a Boeing 757 ACTUALLY hit the pentagon, then this is what the video SHOULD have recorded:



Instead, in the official video we have what looks like a small remote controlled drone plane or a missile. It is most definately NOT a Boeing 757.

Silence Lance.

This thread is now about taking over the world with robots.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 18 2006, 10:36 AM
Post #122





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Lancifer @ May 18 2006, 08:59 AM)
If a Boeing 757 ACTUALLY hit the pentagon, then this is what the video SHOULD have recorded:



Instead, in the official video we have what looks like a small remote controlled drone plane or a missile. It is most definately NOT a Boeing 757.

yeah and w/that framerate that would put the plane at... oh about... 5 mph
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post May 18 2006, 11:43 AM
Post #123





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (Divergent Reality @ May 18 2006, 09:34 AM)
giant robots.

big ones.

with guns and maybe some chain weapons.

possibly a rocket fist like in robot jox.

but not that pussy assed flashbang.

Sounds good. But now you must die, for you know my secret plans!

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: May 18 2006, 11:43 AM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Divergent Realit...
post May 18 2006, 11:50 AM
Post #124



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ May 18 2006, 12:43 PM)
Sounds good.  But now you must die, for you know my secret plans!


ninja GO

ph34r.gif ph34r.gif ninja2.gif ninja2.gif ph34r.gif ninja2.gif hypnotize.gif ph34r.gif ph34r.gif ninja2.gif ninja2.gif ph34r.gif ninja2.gif hypnotize.gif


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRockTTU
post May 18 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #125





Group: Members
Posts: 660
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 22



Am I the only one that notices the HUGE distortion around the outside of the camera image, no doubt from the spherical shape of the protective cover. If you look at how the entire image curves, it looks natural to me that the plane would look much smaller on the outside of the camera image than it would if it was smack dab in the middle.


--------------------
LANCE IS PRO-CENSORSHIP! HE IS CENSORING MY LOVE FOR THE LORD!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 18 2006, 12:55 PM
Post #126





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (JRockTTU @ May 18 2006, 01:54 PM)
Am I the only one that notices the HUGE distortion around the outside of the camera image, no doubt from the spherical shape of the protective cover.  If you look at how the entire image curves, it looks natural to me that the plane would look much smaller on the outside of the camera image than it would if it was smack dab in the middle.

yeah man... and just compare the size of the "object" that's flying in with the size of the building at impact... whatever the object is it's almost 2 stories tall (kinda like a large plane ohmy.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GhostofTHECHICKE...
post May 18 2006, 02:50 PM
Post #127





Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 17-March 06
Member No.: 117



QUOTE (Lancifer @ May 18 2006, 07:59 AM)
If a Boeing 757 ACTUALLY hit the pentagon, then this is what the video SHOULD have recorded:



Instead, in the official video we have what looks like a small remote controlled drone plane or a missile.  It is most definately NOT a Boeing 757.

LOL that plane is way too huge, the tail fin should reach about halfway up on the building, NOT the plane being half the size of the building.

which oddly enough... the 757 in the ACTUAL video meets the right demensions... plus the hole in the pentagon meets the right size...
curious.


Height of building: 77 ft 3.5 in (24 m)

Tail Height of 757: 44 ft 6 in (13.6m)

QUOTE
Pentagon
Cost of building: $49,600,000
Gross floor area: 6,636,360 ft² (620,000 m²)
Cubic contents: 77,015,000 ft³ (2,000,000 m³)
Length of each outer wall: 921 ft (280 m)
Height of building: 77 ft 3.5 in (24 m)
Number of floors, plus mezzanine and basement: 7, 5 above ground, 2 below
Total length of corridors: 17.5 mile (28 km)




QUOTE
it's been reported by at least a dozen different sources (including conspiracy theory sites) to be a 16 to 20 foot hole. That is really interesting when you take into account the fact that the 757 body is 12 ft 4in wide and 13 ft 6in high. (Here is where I was mistaken in the past, like so very many others I was led astray by the HEIGHT of the aircraft, which is actually the measurement from the wheels-down to the tip of the tail. That measurement is for aircraft hangar clearance, not the SIZE of the aircraft.) The 757 is basically a cylinder that is 13 feet across. It then should not be surprising that it would create something around a thirteen foot hole in the side of the building.


QUOTE
Review the facts

Size of 757 matches the initial size of hole in the building - somewhere between 13 and 16 feet (757 is 13 feet wide/high)

Rims found in building match those of a 757

Small turbine engine outside is an APU

Same engine has been clearly stated to not match a Global Hawk engine

Blue seats from 757 laying on ground in photos

Part of "American" fuselage logo visible in more than 1 photo

Engine parts photographed inside match a Rolls-Royce RB211

Structural components photographed in wreckage match Boeing paint primer schemes

Large deisel generator in front of building hit by a large heavy object

Large deisel engine outside is spun towards the building - could not be result of bomb blast or missile explosion

Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner

Multiple eye witnesses say they saw an airliner hit the Pentagon

60+ bodies, matching the passenger list and flight crew roster identified and returned to families from Pentagon wreckage

Go here for some good LOGICAL evidence as well as a small amount of stuff i put:

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/single.php?post=816414

That should just about cover it, have a nice day smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post May 18 2006, 09:51 PM
Post #128


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



QUOTE (Lancifer @ May 18 2006, 07:59 AM)
If a Boeing 757 ACTUALLY hit the pentagon, then this is what the video SHOULD have recorded:



Instead, in the official video we have what looks like a small remote controlled drone plane or a missile. It is most definately NOT a Boeing 757.

that would make it really large plane. Plus its wheels are are down


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim
post May 18 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #129


Let's Bother Snape!!!


Group: Members
Posts: 1,598
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Albuquerque, NM
Member No.: 10



QUOTE (Divergent Reality @ May 18 2006, 08:34 AM)
giant robots.

big ones.

with guns and maybe some chain weapons.

possibly a rocket fist like in robot jox.

but not that pussy assed flashbang.

I shall be the first Gundam Pilot.

I'll have it designed as Deathscythe Hell.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Divergent Realit...
post May 18 2006, 10:43 PM
Post #130



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



QUOTE (Jim @ May 18 2006, 11:04 PM)
I shall be the first Gundam Pilot.

I'll have it designed as Deathscythe Hell.

i choose the thanatos omni mech.

or a tallgese gundam.

i prefer the mechs to gundams.


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jim
post May 18 2006, 11:32 PM
Post #131


Let's Bother Snape!!!


Group: Members
Posts: 1,598
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Albuquerque, NM
Member No.: 10



My Deathscythe Zero could so easily destroy your Tallgese... Now if you said Epion, I'd be worried. But, then again, the chances of you being able to use the Zero-System is slim to none.

Oh, Gundam > Mech


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Divergent Realit...
post May 18 2006, 11:43 PM
Post #132



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



QUOTE (Jim @ May 19 2006, 12:32 AM)
My Deathscythe Zero could so easily destroy your Tallgese... Now if you said Epion, I'd be worried. But, then again, the chances of you being able to use the Zero-System is slim to none.

Oh, Gundam > Mech

not so much a speed or destruction choice, more of an asthetic choice in the tallgese.


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post May 19 2006, 07:30 AM
Post #133


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Jim @ May 18 2006, 11:32 PM)
My Deathscythe Zero could so easily destroy your Tallgese... Now if you said Epion, I'd be worried. But, then again, the chances of you being able to use the Zero-System is slim to none.

Oh, Gundam > Mech

nicks system is powered/cooled/enhanced through the rigorous body stress that mass intake of mountain dew causes


zero system would be a downgrade


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post May 19 2006, 07:31 AM
Post #134


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Divergent Reality @ May 18 2006, 10:43 PM)
i choose the thanatos omni mech.

or a tallgese gundam.

i prefer the mechs to gundams.

Hauptman for me


bit slower, but packs one hell of a punch


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JRockTTU
post May 19 2006, 09:06 AM
Post #135





Group: Members
Posts: 660
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 22



QUOTE (chook @ May 18 2006, 09:51 PM)
that would make it really large plane. Plus its wheels are are down

I'm pretty sure that what that animated gif is illustrating is what would happen if a Giant plan with it's landing gear down drove into an explosive strapped building at 5 mph. That gif is a terrible example because the plane is too big, the landing gear is down, and the plane is moving WAY too slow for the frame rate of the original video.


--------------------
LANCE IS PRO-CENSORSHIP! HE IS CENSORING MY LOVE FOR THE LORD!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

10 Pages V  « < 7 8 9 10 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th August 2026 - 11:13 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com