![]() ![]() |
Oct 10 2007, 02:45 PM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,329 Joined: 20-June 07 Member No.: 1,243 |
like kevin and his straight refusal that ford probes look like his nissan 240 WTF? Isn't that what the Probe is? A domestically badged 240sx? Chuck, they look similar. They have many similarities, hence why they look similar. They do not look identical, but no one was saying that Just for comparison, these do no look similar -------------------- ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 02:53 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() POTATO OLES Group: Members Posts: 1,602 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Newark, NJ Member No.: 17 |
No ford probe shared the same platform as the Mazda MX-6 and was a front wheel drive pile of crap. The 240sx was a rwd pile of crap. The cars look similar because they were both made late 80's to mid 90's and were available as a hatchback.
![]()
-------------------- death to false dudes
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:15 PM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,795 Joined: 29-September 06 Member No.: 327 |
cool Probes!
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:18 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:30 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() monogamous gays & stem cells Group: Members Posts: 3,789 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 8 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:31 PM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() monogamous gays & stem cells Group: Members Posts: 3,789 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 8 |
No ford probe shared the same platform as the Mazda MX-6 and was a front wheel drive pile of crap. The 240sx was a rwd pile of crap. The cars look similar because they were both made late 80's to mid 90's and were available as a hatchback. looks like the probe slides in there more easily than the 240 |
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:41 PM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() POTATO OLES Group: Members Posts: 1,602 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Newark, NJ Member No.: 17 |
looks like the probe slides in there more easily than the 240 I've read this like 10 times and I'm still lost. You totally didn't come sit with me at the football game like 2 weeks ago. -------------------- death to false dudes
|
|
|
|
Oct 10 2007, 03:52 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
i should have known better; you take everything literally. how else am I supposed to read what you said? no average person would be able to tell the difference between the two. meaning, there are no differences big enough to warrant a second look. It's not that big of a deal man. It's a post for truck/chevy fans. I don't expect everyone on here to care. I'm sure at least someone thinks it's neat. If not.. oh well. I felt compelled to share. You felt compelled to belittle it. |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2007, 08:11 PM
Post
#24
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
some guy photochopped his 2005 3/4ton silverado with a 2007 tahoe front clip... why in the hell chevrolet didn't make this blows my mind... awesome look imho ![]() Because if they would have made it in 2005 then they wouldn't have had anything to release in 2007 But, you're also forgetting: Starting in 2007, GM released a whole new generation of trucks. New frames, motors, interiors, body, the whole works. All new trucks ... not just a body kit like it was from 2002->2003. I think the picture you have up there you're saying is a 2006 is an HD, not a 1500 ... they look different than the half tons, just as the new HD front end looks different than the half-ton front clip .... -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th July 2026 - 01:27 PM |