![]() ![]() |
Sep 18 2007, 01:25 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 170 Joined: 26-February 06 Member No.: 83 |
QUOTE wait, the ones in bold are the ones you're picking to win or lose? Ohio State, Texas, etc?? bold = to win with the spread i imagine, since that was kinda already discussed. michigan state is a 14 point underdog to notre dame? am i reading that right? yeah michigan state may suck but come on! no you arent. +14 is what is given to notre dame(they are a 14pt underdog), so to beat the spread notre dame has to lose by less then 14(14 means the bet is a wash) or pull out a win. |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 02:32 PM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
ah. that makes more sense.
so will notre dame score their first touchdown of the season this weekend? -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2007, 03:02 PM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28 |
michigan state is doing pretty well, and they're ranked for the first time in awhile i believe.
i'm hoping notre dame goes the whole season without a TD, haha. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:08 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
if we only had a defense...
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:12 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() monogamous gays & stem cells Group: Members Posts: 3,789 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 8 |
crabtree had another 237 receiving yards. holy crap.
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:15 PM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() KP Group: Members Posts: 146 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cleveland, OH Member No.: 45 |
fucking pissed. what the fuck is wrong with defense, giving up 100 + yards for THREE of the backs. and Harrel had 600+ night. This doesn't add up. you suppose to annihilate the opponent if you throw more than 600 yards. now we can only hope ourselves in a decent bowl game by kicking UT's ass, givin we win all the way from now on (which is very unlikely since mizzou is versatile, and there's always 2006 colorado). I am not even going to go OU game. it will be a blow out.
anyway I am fuking pissed now I didn't get to watch the damn game. I am gonna get a cable and that's the first thing I will do on monday. -------------------- www.twitter.com/qhfxm
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:16 PM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
and amendola had 231.
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:19 PM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
fucking pissed. what the fuck is wrong with defense, giving up 100 + yards for THREE of the backs. and Harrel had 600+ night. This doesn't add up. you suppose to annihilate the opponent if you throw more than 600 yards. now we can only hope ourselves in a decent bowl game by kicking UT's ass, givin we win all the way from now on (which is very unlikely since mizzou is versatile, and there's always 2006 colorado). I am not even going to go OU game. it will be a blow out. anyway I am fuking pissed now I didn't get to watch the damn game. I am gonna get a cable and that's the first thing I will do on monday. if we won out (which isn't gonna happen) we'd be in a BCS bowl. given today's loss, i'd say we'll end up 7-5, typical year. losses to A&M, Mizzou, UT, and OU. ho hum someone fast forward to next year please. |
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 07:32 PM
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
LOL SMU painted "PONY ^" into the TCU field. it's on CSTV right now.
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 09:40 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
we have serious SERIOUS defensive issues.
anytime a qb throws for 650 yards it should be a win. this team reminds me of the 2003 team with bj where the offense can do no wrong and the defense does everything wrong. lyle needs to go. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 09:56 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 46 Joined: 22-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 3 |
According to post game comments by Leach, the loss was the Offense's fault....
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recap?gameId=272650197 |
|
|
|
Sep 22 2007, 11:18 PM
Post
#27
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
i think he was just referring to that last 3 & out we had, not blaming the loss of the game on the offense.
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 10:36 AM
Post
#28
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28 |
we have serious SERIOUS defensive issues. lyle needs to go. this. our defense has sucked for the past several years, and i'm surprised we still have the same defensive coordinator. wtf. get rid of him already. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 11:03 AM
Post
#29
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
as bad as mcmackin sucked. he was ten times better than lyle.
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 23 2007, 04:28 PM
Post
#30
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
woohoo!!! he resigned!!!
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd September 2026 - 06:41 PM |