![]() ![]() |
Sep 19 2007, 08:26 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 08:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
So you have no comment on the story?
seems like just another example of people breaking laws and not complying with police. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 08:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
seems like another example of people taking authority....
oh forget it. we've been here before. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 10:20 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Let's Bother Snape!!! Group: Members Posts: 1,598 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Albuquerque, NM Member No.: 10 |
Stupid. That police officer = dumb
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 10:44 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
what should the officer have done?
and btw the title of the thread is a little misleading. the article says QUOTE Perry refused to give her name to the officer and, when Flygare tried to stop her from going back inside her house, she reportedly tripped and injured her nose.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 12:34 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
Ok, 1) what a fucking dumb law; 2) why was an officer citing her in person? Usually that kind of crap gets sent in the mail.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 12:49 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
impala, want to justify this one too?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/wkmg/20070919/lo_wkmg/14147512 -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 01:12 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
This one is not justifiable. The officer should not have done what he did.
cmac, still can't accept that the kid in the other thread was in the wrong? Even after he admitted the cops did nothing wrong? Even after it looks like it was a stunt pulled by the guy? -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 01:21 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
nope.
the cops are under investigation. i think that means something outside of the ordinary occurred. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 01:56 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
nope. the cops are under investigation. i think that means something outside of the ordinary occurred. I think it means people are watching their asses. No one wants to get sued. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 01:59 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
Ok, 1) what a fucking dumb law; my guess is the ordinance in question is yard upkeep, which is pretty much everywhere in the US. 2) why was an officer citing her in person? Usually that kind of crap gets sent in the mail. again, just a guess, but I'd be willing to be the lady probably had a pile of citations already and she'd been ignoring them. just my guess. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 02:03 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
impala, want to justify this one too? http://news.yahoo.com/s/wkmg/20070919/lo_wkmg/14147512 what should the cops have done in this case? you guys... you don't resist the cops. especially if you have weapons. why does it matter that the lady was in a wheelchair? do the knives not cut and/or kill if wielded from a wheelchair? they used non lethal force in every case we've discussed over the past couple days. what could the cops have done differently with this lady that didn't put them or someone else in danger?? nope. the cops are under investigation. i think that means something outside of the ordinary occurred. anything that is so public involving the cops gets "investigated" nowadays. |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 02:14 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
i don't know. spraying her with a water hose would probably be better than killing her.
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 02:17 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
i don't know. spraying her with a water hose would probably be better than killing her. You do understand that if that lawyer's first point goes through it basically says that people in wheelchairs are lesser human beings and should be treated differently. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Sep 19 2007, 02:22 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
yeah. i think extra care should be taken with people in wheelchairs.
at least they didn't throw her to the ground before they killed her though. that makes it better. look we could apparently argue this forever you guys don't think humans should be treated like humans and i do. that's all. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th October 2026 - 05:18 AM |