![]() ![]() |
Aug 10 2007, 06:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
Ok, so I know how to get to Austin from Lubbock, and I know how to get to San Antonio from Lubbock; but Im trying to think of what would be the fastest way to get to San Marcos....Here is what I have thought about. Anyone know for sure what is the fastest?
Take 87 out of Lubbock for about 4 hours until you get to 71, take that to South Austin and hop on I 35 South or Take 84 to I-20 to some small road I cant remember the name of to 153 to 84 to 183 into Austin and cut over to I-35 South to San Marcos or Take 87 to I-10, drive through San Antonio, and hop on I-35 N Honestly, I think the first one is the fastest, but I have never taken 71 out that far. I mean, I just saw it when I was driving to San Antonio and thought "hmmm 71 cuts through South Austin". Anyone ever taken this way before? If I dont do that first one, then I guess the second one is the best choice. Unless someone knows of a better way that I havent listed. Give me ideas, people. Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 06:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,761 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Lubbock/Dubai Member No.: 57 |
option 2 is what i do to go to seguin and new braunfels
-------------------- bored...so i did this
http://beerlist.wetpaint.com/ |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 06:44 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
I guess I was just kinda hoping there was a way to avoid San Antonio and Austin, or at least a majority of the city. I will probably just end up going through Austin though
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 06:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() monogamous gays & stem cells Group: Members Posts: 3,789 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 8 |
if you go through san antonio, take 1604 to avoid most of the city. as long as you aren't here during rush hour, you'll be fine
|
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 07:35 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
San Antonio has less traffic than Austin, but it takes longer to get to San Antonio then it does to get to Austin, not by much but still. Also, I think (dont quote me on this) San Marcos is slightly closer to Austin than it is to San Antonio. meh. I dont know.
So if I were to go through San Antonio, I take I-10 to 1604 to I-35? I mean, I thought I-10 hit 1604 like 2 or 3 miles before it hits I-35. Whats the point? Maybe Im just dumb. I know 410 and I-10 have a shit ton of construction right now. I definitely want to avoid that mess. |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 07:40 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Oh baby bring me down Group: Agents Posts: 4,115 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Way out yonder Member No.: 68 |
Go the 84 to 183 to 281 at lampasas. Then FM 32 past Blanco. I would do this if Going rush hour time, otherwise through austin.
-------------------- Southern Rock, beer and bears!
![]() |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2007, 08:33 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 926 Joined: 2-May 07 Member No.: 1,015 |
oh you big city people and your numbered roads...
Most of my directions consist of "take university/indiana/quaker and turn right on numbered street" -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2007, 12:17 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 |
QUOTE Take 87 to I-10, drive through San Antonio, and hop on I-35 N This is what my map software says is the fastest and shortest, but it doesn't take into account rush hour / road construction. -------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 30th June 2026 - 05:57 PM |