IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> I-35 bridge collapes, in Minneapolis
cupcake
post Aug 2 2007, 02:16 PM
Post #16





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



we're too busy building bridges in zimbabwe to spend those resources here...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Inferia
post Aug 2 2007, 02:22 PM
Post #17





Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 64



or too busy fighting a certain war...


--------------------
I go to the maize and blue
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Aug 2 2007, 02:49 PM
Post #18





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Inferia @ Aug 2 2007, 03:22 PM) *
or too busy fighting a certain war...


Road repairs and maintenance are funded by state governments, much like levees (hint, hint) so the funds don't come out of federal reserves.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Aug 2 2007, 02:56 PM
Post #19





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 03:12 PM) *
I think of it this way. In the 60's and 70's we were going to the moon, now we're struggling to put people in orbit.

struggling to put people in orbit? while yes the moon missions were awesome accomplishments, we've accomplished far more here in orbit. we went from putting a tiny one seater with almost no cargo into orbit with a monkey, to putting a re-useable vehicle into orbit that can carry 25 tons of cargo. the shuttle has had 2 failures in 118 missions. The Apollo program had 2 failures in 12 missions. I don't see how the hell you could say we're "struggling to put people in orbit" and compare that to the 60s & 70s.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Inferia
post Aug 2 2007, 02:58 PM
Post #20





Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 64



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 02:49 PM) *
Road repairs and maintenance are funded by state governments, much like levees (hint, hint) so the funds don't come out of federal reserves.

where as compared to fixing roads in zimbabwe is out of MN state funds...


--------------------
I go to the maize and blue
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Aug 2 2007, 03:01 PM
Post #21





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (impala454 @ Aug 2 2007, 03:56 PM) *
struggling to put people in orbit? while yes the moon missions were awesome accomplishments, we've accomplished far more here in orbit. we went from putting a tiny one seater with almost no cargo into orbit with a monkey, to putting a re-useable vehicle into orbit that can carry 25 tons of cargo. the shuttle has had 2 failures in 118 missions. The Apollo program had 2 failures in 12 missions. I don't see how the hell you could say we're "struggling to put people in orbit" and compare that to the 60s & 70s.


Last I checked, the Shuttle was still using computers built in the 1980's... If another industry was to do the same thing they'd call them nuts. It costs more to put the Shuttle in orbit one time than it cost for a moon landing.

My point is the progress, or the lack their of. There are stretches of interstate that are in absolutely horrid conditions (I-35 between Austin and Dallas comes to mind).


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Aug 2 2007, 03:02 PM
Post #22





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Inferia @ Aug 2 2007, 03:58 PM) *
where as compared to fixing roads in zimbabwe is out of MN state funds...


I didn't say anything to cupcake's post because it wasn't a blatant attempt to place blame on the administration of this country for this incident (which is what your comment did).

It is just amazing to me how many people immediately turn their attention to Bush on a few issues but don't want to give him any credit for the good things happening (*cough* economy *cough*)


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Inferia
post Aug 2 2007, 03:11 PM
Post #23





Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 64



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 03:02 PM) *
I didn't say anything to cupcake's post because it wasn't a blatant attempt to place blame on the administration of this country for this incident (which is what your comment did).

It is just amazing to me how many people immediately turn their attention to Bush on a few issues but don't want to give him any credit for the good things happening (*cough* economy *cough*)

I'm sorry, but I beg to differ.


--------------------
I go to the maize and blue
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Aug 2 2007, 03:14 PM
Post #24





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Inferia @ Aug 2 2007, 04:11 PM) *
I'm sorry, but I beg to differ.


Beg to differ about what? The economy?

Well, the unemployment has hovered around 4.6% one of the lowest numbers in the last 20 years (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm). No one gives credit to Bush for that, even though he said he'd create jobs.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Aug 2 2007, 03:17 PM
Post #25


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 04:02 PM) *
It is just amazing to me how many people immediately turn their attention to Bush on a few issues but don't want to give him any credit for the good things happening (*cough* economy *cough*)

agreed. especially when bitchy immigrant cunts are the ones doing it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Melanie
post Aug 2 2007, 03:37 PM
Post #26





Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 26-June 06
From: San Marcos and San Antonio
Member No.: 221



I do believe that Interstate maintenance funds come from the Congress through appropriations. Don't mean to be arguing, but just a little FYI.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Aug 2 2007, 03:48 PM
Post #27





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 04:01 PM) *
Last I checked, the Shuttle was still using computers built in the 1980's...

that's because it would cost them more to replace all of those systems than it would be worth.

QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 04:01 PM) *
If another industry was to do the same thing they'd call them nuts. It costs more to put the Shuttle in orbit one time than it cost for a moon landing.

that's because the shuttle can carry 25 tons of shit with it.

QUOTE (Hartmann @ Aug 2 2007, 04:01 PM) *
My point is the progress, or the lack their of. There are stretches of interstate that are in absolutely horrid conditions (I-35 between Austin and Dallas comes to mind).

So how does this relate to the space program?

step 1. gather underpants
step 2. ---
step 3. profit!

step 1. omg we dont go to the moon anymore, even though we've put hundreds of insanely important satellites into orbit and do regular study which has huge impacts on our lives.
step 2. ---
step 3. omg our roads suck

nobody was out talking about road conditions until this stupid incident. this is starting to sound as stupid as the people who wanted to jet-fuel-fire-proof every skyscraper in the country after 9/11.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Aug 2 2007, 03:48 PM
Post #28


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Melanie @ Aug 2 2007, 04:37 PM) *
I do believe that Interstate maintenance funds come from the Congress through appropriations. Don't mean to be arguing, but just a little FYI.


True story. Individual state DOTs engineer the roads and submit proposals to the federal DOT for funding.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Melanie
post Aug 2 2007, 03:59 PM
Post #29





Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 26-June 06
From: San Marcos and San Antonio
Member No.: 221



QUOTE (James @ Aug 2 2007, 04:48 PM) *
True story. Individual state DOTs engineer the roads and submit proposals to the federal DOT for funding.



mmhmm. I used to have to deal with angry constituents in Austin all the time about highways in District 118. Now I have to deal with angry constituents in San Antonio about highways in Congressional District 23. It's a whole bunch of BS. But fun none-the-less. I like the stories constituents call us about. Most people don't know what their municipal, state, and federal representatives are either there for or what services they can call for.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Aug 2 2007, 04:10 PM
Post #30





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



Yes, for new roads or extensions of the roads the federal government funds them but I thought maintenance (filling pot holes, safety barricades, etc.) was funded with state money.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 13th June 2026 - 11:12 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com