IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> presidential candidates that opposed the war in iraq to begin with
Seeker
post Jul 31 2007, 01:51 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



http://www.nytimes.com/ref/us/politics/IRAQPOSITIONS.html

That website lists each presidential candidate and whether they voted yes/no for the Iraq war in 2002 and whether or not they still support the war.

Ron Paul for president and Mike Gravel for Vice President!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Jul 31 2007, 02:04 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



man the NY Times needs a real frickin editor who isn't suckin' on the tit of spellcheck...

"immanent" threat? I'm pretty sure Paul meant "imminent".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Inferia
post Jul 31 2007, 03:16 PM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 64



immanent is a word, and not all the unfitting for this situation..

Why do the some say they are "in favor of troop increase", but their position on withdrawal is "maintaining troop levels"


--------------------
I go to the maize and blue
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Jul 31 2007, 04:47 PM
Post #4


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



I imagine they were given a survey of sorts and on that last question, they were given a choice between the extremes of withdraw and maintain.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Melanie
post Jul 31 2007, 05:01 PM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 26-June 06
From: San Marcos and San Antonio
Member No.: 221



i f'in LOVE Gravel
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Jul 31 2007, 06:24 PM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



QUOTE (Inferia @ Jul 31 2007, 04:16 PM) *
immanent is a word


um...I know. like I said, I'm pretty sure he meant "imminent".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 31 2007, 08:09 PM
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



if someone voted against it at the time i defintely do not want them as president of the united states.

as far as those who give their bullshit hindsight views, they're worthless. if you get all giddy over some jackass who has 20/20 hindsight, good for you.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 3rd November 2026 - 03:30 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com