IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Men talk as much as Women?
chook
post Jul 7 2007, 01:33 AM
Post #16


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



QUOTE (Divergent Reality @ Jul 7 2007, 02:07 AM) *
i think we can all agree that men talk so much as compared to women because it takes that long to get them to spread their legs.

I agree, coupled with the fact that when women are talking and no men are around, it does not count.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RitalinJunkie
post Jul 7 2007, 06:24 AM
Post #17


Corrupting the youth of America


Group: Members
Posts: 528
Joined: 12-May 06
From: Alice, TX
Member No.: 176



fun fact...

of the (now) 17 posts made on this topic, only 3 were by females.

data shows that men talk an estimated 8.33 times more than women


--------------------
Brandon....you're the reason I'm pro-choice.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 7 2007, 10:48 AM
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (chook @ Jul 7 2007, 01:49 AM) *
Its how you handle the numbers. In a small population you cannot take a small selection, because there is a large chance that it won't represent the whole population.
Lets assume a population where half the people believe that Impala is wrong and half where they think Test is wrong. Population size won't matter, but how many we take will. And assuming that its evenly distributed. If I took this survey in the art department, I'd get skewed results than at the BA. So lets say I asked 3 people, based on the truth here is what they could say.
This is based on combinations of people responding
Who is full of shit?
3 impala 0 cat (.5)^3 = .125
2 impala 1 cat 2!(.5)^3 + (.5)^3 = .375
1 impala 2 cat (.5)^3 + 2!(.5)^3 = .375
0 impala 3 cat (.5)^3 = .125

If the sample size increases, then it is more likely that the reported results match the population. In other words, as more people are asked, it is less likely that the results are reflecting the truth. Statistical methods such as chi^2 and variance from the norm are based on solid math. Biggest problem is how these issues are dealt with.

Impala I am ashamed of you calling statistics just numbers. This is much more defined than computer science.
Cat, the problem is with people doing research methods.

so would you agree or not that recording 400 students for roughly 1 hour a day for 10 days is sufficient to apply the result to the entire country?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Jul 7 2007, 12:40 PM
Post #19


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



The problem is that you're getting your information from a newspaper instead of reading the actual journal. I'm sure all of the concerns have been addressed there or it never would have made it to publication. For instance, the newspaper never actually states in which environment men talk as much as women.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 7 2007, 03:03 PM
Post #20





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



well i'd assume the environment is whatever environment the 400 students they recorded talk in.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Jul 7 2007, 04:35 PM
Post #21


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



No you don't. You assume the environment is North America.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jul 7 2007, 10:35 PM
Post #22





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (James @ Jul 7 2007, 05:35 PM) *
No you don't. You assume the environment is North America.

so you think the newspaper is lying when it says:

QUOTE
Their study of 400 male and female students in the United States and Mexico found that males and females both say about 16,000 words a day, or 17 words a minute during waking hours.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Jul 8 2007, 07:38 AM
Post #23


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



No, but I think you took the study to the extreme and assumed it generalized all of North America when it may have only been generalizing North American college students.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
chook
post Jul 8 2007, 01:51 PM
Post #24


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



QUOTE (impala454 @ Jul 7 2007, 11:48 AM) *
so would you agree or not that recording 400 students for roughly 1 hour a day for 10 days is sufficient to apply the result to the entire country?

it would make my 95% certainty if it was an unbiased sampling, but I would no claim that way.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th October 2026 - 11:02 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com