 Safari for Windows |
  |
| Safari for Windows |
 Jun 12 2007, 08:40 AM
Post
#31
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48  |
QUOTE (prefix @ Jun 11 2007, 08:35 PM)  No offense but you always are at the center of it whether you start it or not. I'm always the center of it because I'm the only person on here who doesn't jack off to open source and apple stuff. You guys call me a jerk based on what I respond with because I don't go "ooooh wow omg that's so amazing" every time you post some apple/linux shit. All I did here was say that business wise it didn't make it look like apple has much confidence in their OS anymore (just like they lost confidence in their hardware they were so proud of). |
 |
 
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 08:47 AM
Post
#32
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 12 2007, 09:40 AM) I'm always the center of it because I'm the only person on here who doesn't jack off to open source and apple stuff. You guys call me a jerk based on what I respond with because I don't go "ooooh wow omg that's so amazing" every time you post some apple/linux shit. All I did here was say that business wise it didn't make it look like apple has much confidence in their OS anymore (just like they lost confidence in their hardware they were so proud of). My only problem is you inferring that information (the non-confidence) from a browser release... To give you an example of what that sounds like is Microsoft Office for OS X or an open format because they don't think their OS is that great... If Apple was really worried about their OS, they'd probably start releasing all of their software for Windows. In the end, it's just a browser and I think they are more worried about Firefox and Camino taking over their market share in the browser arena and they want to keep that by compensating and touting their OS at the same time. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 09:48 AM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (Hartmann @ Jun 12 2007, 09:47 AM) My only problem is you inferring that information (the non-confidence) from a browser release... it's just my opinion on why they did it... they don't have much other software left to port to windows. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 10:26 AM
Post
#34
|
|
 Retired Funk-bringer Group: Moderators Posts: 2,656 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas Member No.: 14 |
I used it for a bit, it seems pretty bloated. Seemed a little slow.
-------------------- WAIT. I'm not finished.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 10:53 AM
Post
#35
|
|
|
I was raised on the dairy, BITCH! Group: Members Posts: 3,080 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cedar Park Member No.: 49 |
their port of iTunes ran slow as well
-------------------- "Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 01:58 PM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
is it me or does the font seem really fat?
doesn't seem slow or anything to me, just different. my only noteables are just that thing where you can only resize the window from the lower right, and I don't like how the form buttons appear, and don't push in or move at all when you click them. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 03:48 PM
Post
#37
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
woah. resizable forms. the reply space is resizeable...
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 04:02 PM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
haha weird... that'll piss off a lot of developers..
not real sure what purpose it serves.. strange. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 04:10 PM
Post
#39
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
Supposedly the release of Safari on Windows is related somehow to the iPhone. More than likely they'll attempt some kind of iPhone/Safari lock-in.
What really sucks about the iPhone is Apple is not releasing an SDK for it. I hope the iPhone dies a horrible death. |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 05:45 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
I was raised on the dairy, BITCH! Group: Members Posts: 3,080 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cedar Park Member No.: 49 |
QUOTE (1up @ Jun 12 2007, 05:10 PM) Supposedly the release of Safari on Windows is related somehow to the iPhone. More than likely they'll attempt some kind of iPhone/Safari lock-in. What really sucks about the iPhone is Apple is not releasing an SDK for it. I hope the iPhone dies a horrible death. it will be popular at release but will die off after die hard fans find things wrong with it and it being 500 dollars -------------------- "Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 08:22 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (1up @ Jun 12 2007, 05:10 PM) Supposedly the release of Safari on Windows is related somehow to the iPhone. More than likely they'll attempt some kind of iPhone/Safari lock-in. What really sucks about the iPhone is Apple is not releasing an SDK for it. I hope the iPhone dies a horrible death. There will be an SDK for the iPhone but it will basically be for Web 2.0 apps. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th August 2026 - 03:55 PM |
