![]() ![]() |
May 13 2007, 12:07 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Agents Posts: 4,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lu-bok Member No.: 41 |
cherry
QUOTE Depictions of smoking in movies will now be a factor when deciding what a film's rating will be, possibly making a PG-13 movie R-rated, the Motion Picture Association of America said yesterday. The policy affects only new movies. Along with violence, depictions of sex, adult language and other content considerations, ratings organizations will examine new releases to determine if they glamorize smoking or if it is pervasive through the films, even among adults. Underage smoking has always been considered when rating a film. thats sweet. because there is smoking, it could be r rated. sorry al, UHF could become less family friendly. -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 13 2007, 10:17 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
Looks like somebody took Thank You for Smoking a little too seriously.
Edit: Ha! I should read the full article before saying that! This post has been edited by Spectatrix: May 13 2007, 10:20 AM -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 09:10 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
may sound dumb on the surface, but it makes sense, we're talking about the difference between allowing 13 yr olds & 17 year olds into a movie.
really the whole rating system needs to be revamped though. we'll have some movie that's barely rated R because of some smoking or other adult only activity, then we'll have some uber gore slasher movie with several softcore pr0n scenes rated in the same category. I think G, PG & PG-13 seem to be correct, but R should be split up into a couple of categories. or do how the premium movie channels do, show something like a ALNV (Adult situations, Language, Nudity, Violence) but with a little more detail. Ok so after blabbing, that works pretty well, could do like a ALNV rating for each movie and do away with the rest... somethin like letter/number, A0L0N0V0 for the bambi 7, and A5L5N5V5 for the latest psychopath killer slasher bloody pot smoking alcoholic pr0n thriller. |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 10:10 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
Tom & Jerry
Rated: R
-------------------- |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 10:14 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
heheh good point
oh the simpler days... |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 10:52 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 |
I don't see a problem with the R rating. Kids aren't supposed to be getting into those if it's a little smoking or "some uber gore slasher movie with several softcore pr0n scenes" without a parent present. If the parents are letting them watch it, then they feel their child is mature enough to handle it or just a bad parent. If the theatre is letting them by, then shame on them, but I doubt there's a regulatory agency for it like there is for underage drinking.
-------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 11:02 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
I wish a theatre chain would grow some balls and not restrict entrance to movies based on rating. The 17+ for R movies is not a legal requirement, but a purely voluntary practice.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 11:26 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
kids are annoying at the movies anyways. I say its a good thing. While we are at it, change R rating to 20 and up
|
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 11:45 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Fool Group: Members Posts: 2,127 Joined: 23-February 06 From: LBB Member No.: 56 |
I wish a theatre chain would grow some balls and not restrict entrance to movies based on rating. The 17+ for R movies is not a legal requirement, but a purely voluntary practice. Maybe not a legal requirement, but definitely a moral obligation. What benefit is there to allowing the kiddos into an R-rated movie unsupervised? -------------------- Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
|
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 11:58 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
|
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 12:03 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
it's not a legal issue, they simply won't sell them the ticket.
i heard about some uber theater in chicago that has an awesome atmoshpere, either 18 or 21 and up, serving restaurant style food & drinks (alcohol too) and having large recliner sized chairs and stuff. i would pay much more for a regular ticket if it meant there wouldn't be stupid kids and there'd be ultra comfortable seating, with the option for food and drinks. one of my biggest pet peeves at movies is people who bring babies. especially to movies like spiderman. |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 02:06 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
my pet peeve is the motherfucker in the theater talking on their cell phone..
fuck that cunt -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 02:25 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() monogamous gays & stem cells Group: Members Posts: 3,789 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 8 |
Yeah, but kids dont need to be seeing rated R movies why? i'm not saying that they should, but a lot of R movies are only rated that way because of language or "partial" nudity, both of which are already on network tv. my pet peeve is the motherfucker in the theater talking on their cell phone.. fuck that cunt yeah, even when people are texting, the room is usually dark enough to where a phone glows like the damn sun. |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 02:33 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
Maybe not a legal requirement, but definitely a moral obligation. What benefit is there to allowing the kiddos into an R-rated movie unsupervised? I think "moral obligation" is a bit of a stretch. Yeah, but kids dont need to be seeing rated R movies Are you telling me that you never saw a rated-R movie without your folks before you turned 17? I'm perhaps biased because I was watching R flicks by the time I was 6 or so, with some restrictions from my parents (basically they didn't care about violence or language, but monitored the sexual content of what I watched). By the time I was a teen, my parents would've given the go-ahead for just about any rated-R movie I wanted to watch, but then you've got the whole requisite parental accompaniment bit at the theatres. Bit annoying, that. i heard about some uber theater in chicago that has an awesome atmoshpere, either 18 or 21 and up, serving restaurant style food & drinks (alcohol too) and having large recliner sized chairs and stuff. i would pay much more for a regular ticket if it meant there wouldn't be stupid kids and there'd be ultra comfortable seating, with the option for food and drinks. Sounds vaguely like Alamo Drafthouse here in Austin? -------------------- |
|
|
|
May 14 2007, 02:33 PM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
why? i'm not saying that they should, but a lot of R movies are only rated that way because of language or "partial" nudity, both of which are already on network tv. Please dont start on this subject with me...seriously. Im one to believe that kids should maintain their innocense as long as possible. I wouldnt let my kids watch shows on tv that are suggestive. Its easy to monitor what kids watch on tv at home, but if I drop my 15 year old off at the movies with her friend, I dont want her watching Eyes Wide Shut.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th August 2026 - 01:51 PM |