IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> smoking in movies, r rated
Divergent Realit...
post May 13 2007, 12:07 AM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



cherry

QUOTE
Depictions of smoking in movies will now be a factor when deciding what a film's rating will be, possibly making a PG-13 movie R-rated, the Motion Picture Association of America said yesterday. The policy affects only new movies.

Along with violence, depictions of sex, adult language and other content considerations, ratings organizations will examine new releases to determine if they glamorize smoking or if it is pervasive through the films, even among adults. Underage smoking has always been considered when rating a film.


thats sweet. because there is smoking, it could be r rated.

sorry al, UHF could become less family friendly.


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post May 13 2007, 10:17 AM
Post #2





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



Looks like somebody took Thank You for Smoking a little too seriously.

Edit: Ha! I should read the full article before saying that! wink.gif

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: May 13 2007, 10:20 AM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 14 2007, 09:10 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



may sound dumb on the surface, but it makes sense, we're talking about the difference between allowing 13 yr olds & 17 year olds into a movie.

really the whole rating system needs to be revamped though. we'll have some movie that's barely rated R because of some smoking or other adult only activity, then we'll have some uber gore slasher movie with several softcore pr0n scenes rated in the same category. I think G, PG & PG-13 seem to be correct, but R should be split up into a couple of categories. or do how the premium movie channels do, show something like a ALNV (Adult situations, Language, Nudity, Violence) but with a little more detail.

Ok so after blabbing, that works pretty well, could do like a ALNV rating for each movie and do away with the rest... somethin like letter/number, A0L0N0V0 for the bambi 7, and A5L5N5V5 for the latest psychopath killer slasher bloody pot smoking alcoholic pr0n thriller.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post May 14 2007, 10:10 AM
Post #4





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



Tom & Jerry
Rated: R


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 14 2007, 10:14 AM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



heheh good point

oh the simpler days...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post May 14 2007, 10:52 AM
Post #6


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



I don't see a problem with the R rating. Kids aren't supposed to be getting into those if it's a little smoking or "some uber gore slasher movie with several softcore pr0n scenes" without a parent present. If the parents are letting them watch it, then they feel their child is mature enough to handle it or just a bad parent. If the theatre is letting them by, then shame on them, but I doubt there's a regulatory agency for it like there is for underage drinking.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post May 14 2007, 11:02 AM
Post #7





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



I wish a theatre chain would grow some balls and not restrict entrance to movies based on rating. The 17+ for R movies is not a legal requirement, but a purely voluntary practice.


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post May 14 2007, 11:26 AM
Post #8


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



kids are annoying at the movies anyways. I say its a good thing. While we are at it, change R rating to 20 and up
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post May 14 2007, 11:45 AM
Post #9


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ May 14 2007, 12:02 PM) *
I wish a theatre chain would grow some balls and not restrict entrance to movies based on rating. The 17+ for R movies is not a legal requirement, but a purely voluntary practice.


Maybe not a legal requirement, but definitely a moral obligation. What benefit is there to allowing the kiddos into an R-rated movie unsupervised?


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post May 14 2007, 11:58 AM
Post #10


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ May 14 2007, 12:02 PM) *
I wish a theatre chain would grow some balls and not restrict entrance to movies based on rating. The 17+ for R movies is not a legal requirement, but a purely voluntary practice.
Yeah, but kids dont need to be seeing rated R movies
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 14 2007, 12:03 PM
Post #11





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



it's not a legal issue, they simply won't sell them the ticket.

i heard about some uber theater in chicago that has an awesome atmoshpere, either 18 or 21 and up, serving restaurant style food & drinks (alcohol too) and having large recliner sized chairs and stuff. i would pay much more for a regular ticket if it meant there wouldn't be stupid kids and there'd be ultra comfortable seating, with the option for food and drinks.

one of my biggest pet peeves at movies is people who bring babies. especially to movies like spiderman.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post May 14 2007, 02:06 PM
Post #12





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



my pet peeve is the motherfucker in the theater talking on their cell phone..


fuck that cunt


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post May 14 2007, 02:25 PM
Post #13


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



QUOTE (Jessica @ May 14 2007, 12:58 PM) *
Yeah, but kids dont need to be seeing rated R movies

why? i'm not saying that they should, but a lot of R movies are only rated that way because of language or "partial" nudity, both of which are already on network tv.

QUOTE (woody @ May 14 2007, 03:06 PM) *
my pet peeve is the motherfucker in the theater talking on their cell phone..
fuck that cunt

yeah, even when people are texting, the room is usually dark enough to where a phone glows like the damn sun.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post May 14 2007, 02:33 PM
Post #14





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (James @ May 14 2007, 12:45 PM) *
Maybe not a legal requirement, but definitely a moral obligation. What benefit is there to allowing the kiddos into an R-rated movie unsupervised?

I think "moral obligation" is a bit of a stretch.

QUOTE (Jessica @ May 14 2007, 12:58 PM) *
Yeah, but kids dont need to be seeing rated R movies

Are you telling me that you never saw a rated-R movie without your folks before you turned 17? I'm perhaps biased because I was watching R flicks by the time I was 6 or so, with some restrictions from my parents (basically they didn't care about violence or language, but monitored the sexual content of what I watched). By the time I was a teen, my parents would've given the go-ahead for just about any rated-R movie I wanted to watch, but then you've got the whole requisite parental accompaniment bit at the theatres. Bit annoying, that.

QUOTE (impala454 @ May 14 2007, 01:03 PM) *
i heard about some uber theater in chicago that has an awesome atmoshpere, either 18 or 21 and up, serving restaurant style food & drinks (alcohol too) and having large recliner sized chairs and stuff. i would pay much more for a regular ticket if it meant there wouldn't be stupid kids and there'd be ultra comfortable seating, with the option for food and drinks.

Sounds vaguely like Alamo Drafthouse here in Austin?


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post May 14 2007, 02:33 PM
Post #15


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (lamont's lament @ May 14 2007, 03:25 PM) *
why? i'm not saying that they should, but a lot of R movies are only rated that way because of language or "partial" nudity, both of which are already on network tv.
Please dont start on this subject with me...seriously. Im one to believe that kids should maintain their innocense as long as possible. I wouldnt let my kids watch shows on tv that are suggestive. Its easy to monitor what kids watch on tv at home, but if I drop my 15 year old off at the movies with her friend, I dont want her watching Eyes Wide Shut.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th August 2026 - 01:58 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com