 Ancient Skeleton Disproves Intelligent Design- Religious Leaders Pissed |
  |
| Ancient Skeleton Disproves Intelligent Design- Religious Leaders Pissed |
 Feb 9 2007, 03:12 PM
Post
#16
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31  |
-------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
 |
 
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 03:31 PM
Post
#17
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
i suppose someone would like to explain to me how this "disproves" intelligent design...
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 03:34 PM
Post
#18
|
|
 N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Feb 9 2007, 03:31 PM)  i suppose someone would like to explain to me how this "disproves" intelligent design... Why? The best explanation in the world would not change your mind of what you already believe as truth. --------------------  QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:22 PM) |
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 03:36 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
i'm just interested in why you guys seem to think finding a 6 million year old human disproves intelligent design. i didn't realize that the only reason for debate was to change people's minds.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 03:45 PM
Post
#20
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 1,551 Joined: 19-April 06 From: Lubbock Member No.: 162 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Feb 9 2007, 03:31 PM) i suppose someone would like to explain to me how this "disproves" intelligent design... yeah...it really doesn't. it mostly just proves that that bishop is unrealistic. it was a bit of a misleading topic title -------------------- Je suis toute du merde.
....bitches!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 03:53 PM
Post
#21
|
|
 GORILLA FLUFFER  Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
fuck that jesus fuck
--------------------  QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded. Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!! |
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 04:24 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (griseyeux @ Feb 9 2007, 03:45 PM) yeah...it really doesn't. it mostly just proves that that bishop is unrealistic. it was a bit of a misleading topic title thanks  nice to have someone on my side every now and then
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 04:25 PM
Post
#23
|
|
 FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
HAHAHA TAKE THAT RELIGION YOU ARE DUMB IN THE FACE
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 04:35 PM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Feb 9 2007, 03:36 PM) i'm just interested in why you guys seem to think finding a 6 million year old human disproves intelligent design. i didn't realize that the only reason for debate was to change people's minds. I don't think it does. I think it disproves young earth creationism, but not creationism/ID in general. I don't believe in ID, but this certainly doesn't disprove it. *shrugs* -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 05:23 PM
Post
#25
|
|
 Oh baby bring me down Group: Agents Posts: 4,115 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Way out yonder Member No.: 68 |
QUOTE (Seussninja @ Feb 9 2007, 04:25 PM) HAHAHA TAKE THAT RELIGION YOU ARE DUMB IN THE FACE "Better Dumb than Ugly" - Zoolander -------------------- Southern Rock, beer and bears!
 |
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2007, 06:10 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Group: Moderators Posts: 1,551 Joined: 19-April 06 From: Lubbock Member No.: 162 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Feb 9 2007, 04:24 PM) thanks nice to have someone on my side every now and thenno prob, bob. unlike foxnews I actually DO try to keep things fair and balanced. -------------------- Je suis toute du merde.
....bitches!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2007, 12:11 PM
Post
#27
|
|
 Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
QUOTE (Overlord @ Feb 9 2007, 02:26 PM) everyone knows that aliens genetically engineered humans and left sequences in our DNA that are tripped by certain chemicals, LSD, dimethyltrypamine (DMT), THC, mescaline etc. that reveal secret messages to us, geeze louise, you creationists and evolutionists are frickin' retarded MACHINE ELVES Damn those reptilian fuckers -------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2007, 04:27 PM
Post
#28
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Feb 9 2007, 02:28 PM) They wouldn't have used carbon dating for something 6 million years old, as carbon dating is only good up to 45-60k years. However, there are other forms of radiometric dating. Uranium-lead dating, for instance, can date things from 1 million to 4.5 billion years old. It wouldn't be used to directly date organic remains but it could be used in combination with stratigraphy. Just a quick note. Carbon dating can theoretically date things to 45-60k years, however, at those dates it is highly unreliable and not used as "scientific" in a lot of circles. We used carbon dating and uranium-lead dating at Shell and I preferred to look at results that had gone through the uranium-lead process for the simple reason that they were a bit more reliable (though no perfect). The way we were taught to use results as mere theory and not as something concrete. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2007, 04:36 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
Yeah, that's true. Different dating methods are more reliable for certain ages of things. I was just wanting to point out that there are more kinds of radioactive dating than just carbon.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Feb 12 2007, 08:14 PM
Post
#30
|
|
 DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
carbon dating has been obsolete for like 30 years now ...
-------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th August 2026 - 11:08 PM |
