IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> man has google searches used against him in court
Seeker
post Dec 27 2006, 10:34 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



http://news.com.com/Police%2Bblotter%2BGoo...html?tag=cd.top

all the more reason to use scroogle: http://www.scroogle.org/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kschristia
post Dec 27 2006, 01:16 PM
Post #2





Group: Moderators
Posts: 161
Joined: 27-November 06
Member No.: 425



QUOTE (Overlord @ Dec 27 2006, 10:34 AM) *



Holy crap


--------------------
I've got Lance in my pants
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Dec 27 2006, 01:29 PM
Post #3





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Overlord @ Dec 27 2006, 10:34 AM) *


Or, all the more reason not to break the law...


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cupcake
post Dec 27 2006, 02:31 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1,795
Joined: 29-September 06
Member No.: 327



true. and in this instance it's fine...so it seems.

but then my thoughts strayed to other scenrarios...what if in a divorce hearing, the wife's attorney used her husband's google searches of "big tits" or "angelina jolie" something to defame his character that he was a reprobate and sway the judge in her favor?

what if you were held accountable for everything you've ever googled? a quick check on my recent searches brings up somewhat disturbing stuff if taken out of context. I just googled "mexico purse" because I was looking for a cheesy pic to make fun of someone...

what is the slippery slope on this?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Dec 27 2006, 03:45 PM
Post #5





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (cupcake @ Dec 27 2006, 02:31 PM) *
true. and in this instance it's fine...so it seems.

but then my thoughts strayed to other scenrarios...what if in a divorce hearing, the wife's attorney used her husband's google searches of "big tits" or "angelina jolie" something to defame his character that he was a reprobate and sway the judge in her favor?

what if you were held accountable for everything you've ever googled? a quick check on my recent searches brings up somewhat disturbing stuff if taken out of context. I just googled "mexico purse" because I was looking for a cheesy pic to make fun of someone...

what is the slippery slope on this?


I agree, but I think there are a lot of issues that need to be considered. For one, how was the search history acquired? Was it from his cache on his browser? If so, then I have no problem with it. If Google turned over the records then I have a big problem with it. If the ISP turned over the HTTP requests, then I have a slight problem with it.

When I will start getting concerned is when the government is asking for things to be turned over that we expect to be private (encrypted transactions, skype conversations, etc.)


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Dec 27 2006, 05:48 PM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



I expect my google searches to be private.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post Dec 27 2006, 05:54 PM
Post #7


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Overlord @ Dec 27 2006, 05:48 PM) *
I expect my google searches to be private.


"If you dont have expectations, you wont be disappointed"

-me
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Dec 27 2006, 05:55 PM
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



Because of the relationship you're in I can see why you adopted that philosophy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post Dec 27 2006, 06:35 PM
Post #9


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (Overlord @ Dec 27 2006, 05:55 PM) *
Because of the relationship you're in I can see why you adopted that philosophy.


that isnt my philosophy... thats just the quote I use when people bitch about privacy expectations. If a company or the government wants to use "private" information to put criminals behind bars then I dont really care. If you dont do anything wrong, then you dont have anything to worry about. In my opinion, there are a lot more important things to worry about then ones own idea of what personal freedom should be. Im sorry but Americans shouldnt really bitch so much about the government when there are children in Africa dying of aids because they were raped. When will you people start to realize that life here in America is more than some people could ever dream of?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Dec 27 2006, 07:28 PM
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE
Court documents are ambiguous and don't reveal how the FBI discovered his search terms.


how do you know the search information was provided by google?

it also doesn't look like they were a key piece of evidence... just supportive mainly. they siezed his computer with a search warrant and I'm sure they found all they needed to know from that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post Dec 27 2006, 10:22 PM
Post #11


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Jessica @ Dec 27 2006, 06:35 PM) *
that isnt my philosophy... thats just the quote I use when people bitch about privacy expectations. If a company or the government wants to use "private" information to put criminals behind bars then I dont really care. If you dont do anything wrong, then you dont have anything to worry about. In my opinion, there are a lot more important things to worry about then ones own idea of what personal freedom should be. Im sorry but Americans shouldnt really bitch so much about the government when there are children in Africa dying of aids because they were raped. When will you people start to realize that life here in America is more than some people could ever dream of?




these little freedoms are what make things better for us in America. so yea, they take a bit here, take a bit there. eventually we are just as oppressed as the 3rd world countries. look at how much freedom as citizens we have lost compared to 30 years ago, 50, and further?

if we don't bitch and maintain those freedoms, we WILL be the children with AIDS because they were raped. you have to work and fight for those freedoms, cunt.


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mommy
post Dec 27 2006, 10:29 PM
Post #12


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



you little cunts need to stop buying tampons, wake up, smell the coffee, and realize that there are a lot of things we could go WAAAAAAAAAH about but not everything can can be a rose petal on our tushy
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Dec 28 2006, 12:46 AM
Post #13





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



....

i've never had a rose petal on my tushy

wonder what that's like...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
zetec
post Dec 28 2006, 02:43 AM
Post #14


Retired Funk-bringer


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,656
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Dallas
Member No.: 14



QUOTE (Overlord @ Dec 27 2006, 05:55 PM) *
Because of the relationship you're in I can see why you adopted that philosophy.

ZING


--------------------
WAIT. I'm not finished.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Dec 28 2006, 02:43 AM
Post #15


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



In this case, the "violation" of privacy was ok imo, because the police obtained a search warrant. The second they obtained that warrant, the hacker lost his privacy. They had the authority to search his computer, house, even phone records.... why not google searches? They were made on his computer, which was his property...


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th August 2026 - 04:44 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com