![]() ![]() |
Nov 15 2006, 07:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,229504,00.html
you have gotta fucking be kidding me... "If I did it, here's how I would have done it". Give me a fucking break. Everyone on this planet knows you fucking killed those two it's just that you had the money to convince idiots youze iz a po po black man -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2006, 04:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
It's entirely possible he didn't commit the murders. I am curious though, what inside information you have that makes you so sure that he did?
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2006, 04:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Prize? Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 16-October 06 Member No.: 343 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2006, 10:57 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
It's entirely possible he didn't commit the murders. I am curious though, what inside information you have that makes you so sure that he did? If he didn't, who did? Who in the hell is going to pull what he's doing now? Are you kidding me? Do you remeber watching any of the trial footage, or the underlying theme of the defense? "The White man out to get da po' black man" was basically his million-dollar defense. What the Simpson trial meant was that a jury didn't have the evidence to convict him of a criminal act, however, if you remember in the civil case it was basically a referendum for lack of a better word on the botched criminal case. Do you remember how fucked upt het rial was? It was a total media circus after the defense convinced the judge to allow cameras in the court room ... Of course he did it, and I don't see how anyone who paid any attention to the trial back then could have concluded otherwise.... I mean for crying out loud ... "If I did it, here's how I would have done it" ... seriously ... -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Nov 15 2006, 11:40 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() ROCKPACALYPSE NOW Group: Members Posts: 1,519 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 13 |
QUOTE Now, I'm not sayin' he should have killed her...but I understand
-------------------- QUOTE (Lance) now we have some dude from argentina wondering how to fuck dogmeat |
|
|
|
Nov 15 2006, 11:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
CHEE CHEE Group: Members Posts: 5,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: trapped in the hoezone layer Member No.: 39 |
if he did it its the police departments fault for him being free. they sealed the deal
-------------------- Little monkeys making money
Naked monkey looking funny Mighty males are strong and free Female monkey, not so lucky Rocking monkeys, funky monkeys Monkeys sticking other monkeys Monkeys wrong or monkeys right Mostly flexing monkey might |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 12:40 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
Black juries...
-------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 08:08 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
If he didn't, who did? Who in the hell is going to pull what he's doing now? Are you kidding me? Do you remeber watching any of the trial footage, or the underlying theme of the defense? "The White man out to get da po' black man" was basically his million-dollar defense. What the Simpson trial meant was that a jury didn't have the evidence to convict him of a criminal act, however, if you remember in the civil case it was basically a referendum for lack of a better word on the botched criminal case. Do you remember how fucked upt het rial was? It was a total media circus after the defense convinced the judge to allow cameras in the court room ... Of course he did it, and I don't see how anyone who paid any attention to the trial back then could have concluded otherwise.... I mean for crying out loud ... "If I did it, here's how I would have done it" ... seriously ... I just think people like to repeat whatever the media tells them without knowing the details of the situation. Kind of the like the other popular case where the lady spills McDonald's coffee on herself and sues. The majority of people think that's the most fucked up thing ever. But if you look into what really happened, it is more likely you'll agree with the outcome. Edit: But I'm not saying he didn't do it. Because I don't know either way. I wasn't there. And the only thing I know about the case is the biased media reports on it. So I can't claim I know one way or the other. And I think there are very few people who really can make that claim. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 10:44 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 59 |
Um let's see. In his room he had a bunch of bloody clothes, covered in their blood. Blood in his car that was shown to be theres. A bloody glove on the side of his house, once again covered in their blood. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..........
Nope mark furman (spelling?) planted all of those, so he didn't do it. |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 11:13 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() fuck you! Group: Members Posts: 641 Joined: 22-February 06 From: fuck you! Member No.: 19 |
It's entirely possible he didn't commit the murders. I am curious though, what inside information you have that makes you so sure that he did? uh, maybe the DNA odds (which weren't used back then) that gave OJ something like a 168 million to one odds that he didn't kill them? -------------------- only here to talk sports occationally
|
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 11:14 AM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Prize? Group: Members Posts: 302 Joined: 16-October 06 Member No.: 343 |
ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca.
Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major case, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests. |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 04:40 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
Ok. I stand corrected. It seems everyone has gotten to see first hand evidence that clearly shows without a shadow of a doubt that OJ was guilty and they aren't basing these opinions on media hearsay. Everyone knows that juries, judges, and lawyers are just stupid and that the answer is so clear because if the media says so then by god, that's the way it is.
edit: again, not claiming that OJ isn't guilty. I'm just claiming you don't know one way or the other. edit2: however, the one sided argument against OJ is pretty convincing and based on that alone it definitely looks like he's guilty. but the media never did give his side of the story. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 16 2006, 05:28 PM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
Um let's see. In his room he had a bunch of bloody clothes, covered in their blood. Blood in his car that was shown to be theres. A bloody glove on the side of his house, once again covered in their blood. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......... Nope mark furman (spelling?) planted all of those, so he didn't do it. No way man it was Kato Kailin -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Nov 17 2006, 11:50 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() GORILLA FLUFFER Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
Ok. I stand corrected. It seems everyone has gotten to see first hand evidence that clearly shows without a shadow of a doubt that OJ was guilty and they aren't basing these opinions on media hearsay. Everyone knows that juries, judges, and lawyers are just stupid and that the answer is so clear because if the media says so then by god, that's the way it is. edit: again, not claiming that OJ isn't guilty. I'm just claiming you don't know one way or the other. edit2: however, the one sided argument against OJ is pretty convincing and based on that alone it definitely looks like he's guilty. but the media never did give his side of the story. no one is agreeing with you because you are a communist -------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 19 2006, 05:21 AM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() The Transient Aggie Group: Members Posts: 546 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 21 |
It's entirely possible he didn't commit the murders. I am curious though, what inside information you have that makes you so sure that he did?
-------------------- ![]() A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th August 2026 - 06:04 AM |