![]() ![]() |
Nov 8 2006, 07:13 PM
Post
#31
|
|
![]() Group: Agents Posts: 4,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lu-bok Member No.: 41 |
-------------------- |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2006, 09:49 PM
Post
#32
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
A decent explanation as to why increasing the minimum wage won't help as much as people think: http://ingrimayne.com/econ/AllocatingRatio...ceCeilings.html You only think it's good because you agree with it. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 8 2006, 09:52 PM
Post
#33
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
if we keep making poor people richer then the rich people will be poorer.
fuck raising the minimum wage, I say lower it -------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 12:34 AM
Post
#34
|
|
|
FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
yeah fuck those nigicewlims and their money they should work for free lololololololl
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 12:37 AM
Post
#35
|
|
![]() Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
We should re-institute slavery
-------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 02:00 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 08:25 AM
Post
#37
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
You only think it's good because you agree with it. No, I think it's good because it follows the basic laws of economics instead of using power as the basis. You can't really argue with Smith and Mills, mostly 'cause they're dead. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 08:55 AM
Post
#38
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
No, I think it's good because it follows the basic laws of economics instead of using power as the basis. You can't really argue with Smith and Mills, mostly 'cause they're dead. You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're going to argue (which you have in the past) that based on "inflation" the price of gas is actually really cheap, then I'm going to take that same "inflation" and claim minimum wage is currently too low. It has not seen an increase since 1997, almost 10 years. But no doubt, "inflation" has definitely made everything more expensive. Here's a nice historical tidbit on the last time minimum wage was raised so the anti labor class can shut the fuck up about their "the world will end" theories on if minimum wage gets an increase: QUOTE Recent history offers something of a counterargument here: During a 1996 debate about raising the minimum wage from $4.25 to $5.15, opponents said that the increase would cost between 100,000 and 625,000 new jobs. In 1997, the non-farm economy created more than 3 million new jobs, unemployment was at its lowest rate in 28 years, the gross domestic product expanded by 3.8 percent, and the growth in earnings took off. In addition, real average hourly earnings saw their largest increases in 21 years. And in 1999, New Hampshire ranked first in the country with a 5.5-percent increase in jobs from the previous year. Strikingly similar argument. Yet, that didn't happen last time. Nor the time before. And won't happen now. There is definitely something wrong with your "economics". Because what you claim in theory, does not even come close to happening in the real economic world. Actually, arguably, the opposite happens. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 09:08 AM
Post
#39
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
You can't have your cake and eat it too. If you're going to argue (which you have in the past) that based on "inflation" the price of gas is actually really cheap, then I'm going to take that same "inflation" and claim minimum wage is currently too low. It has not seen an increase since 1997, almost 10 years. But no doubt, "inflation" has definitely made everything more expensive. Here's a nice historical tidbit on the last time minimum wage was raised so the anti labor class can shut the fuck up about their "the world will end" theories on if minimum wage gets an increase: Strikingly similar argument. Yet, that didn't happen last time. Nor the time before. And won't happen now. There is definitely something wrong with your "economics". Because what you claim in theory, does not even come close to happening in the real economic world. Actually, arguably, the opposite happens. I've never said that gas is really cheap (or cheap for that matter), I've said it is on par and not high. And it's on par for many reasons, including inflation, but also because of consumption of natural resources, war (unnatural inflation), etc. I agree that things are more expensive but I also know that there is balance here. We are not putting more people out on the street every time the dollar loses a few pennies of value... I mean, are we? I just think the balance is going to be disturbed and the long term effects will be more costly than an extra $2 an hour for businesses. I don't think the world will end, but thanks for taking my view completely out of context. I think that we will see an "unnatural" decrease in small business, an "unnatural" jump in inflation (last time I checked inflation/deflation was natural), and a nail in the housing market's coffin (don't know why, just have a feeling). I am just against it. I think that if it is going to happen it should happen at extremely slow pace, which basically offset it anyway (people getting yearly raises to compensate for inflation *cough*) -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 09:23 AM
Post
#40
|
|
![]() N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
I think that we will see an "unnatural" decrease in small business, an "unnatural" jump in inflation (last time I checked inflation/deflation was natural), and a nail in the housing market's coffin (don't know why, just have a feeling). Is that what happened last time? Because if something similar happened in the past then you have a case; a reason to believe the way you do. But if not, you really should stop holding on to flawed theories. If policy can be made based on past evidence instead of belief, then policy should be made based on past evidence instead of belief. I am completely willing to agree with you on what will happen if the minimum wage gets increased if you can show me evidence to support these claims. Because I have not seen any so far. But I have seen plenty of evidence to refute them. And by evidence, I do not mean links to reputable economists. That's like claiming the Bible is fact by citing the pope. No, I want history. That's what I want. -------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 09:34 AM
Post
#41
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
Is that what happened last time? Because if something similar happened in the past then you have a case; a reason to believe the way you do. But if not, you really should stop holding on to flawed theories. If policy can be made based on past evidence instead of belief, then policy should be made based on past evidence instead of belief. I am completely willing to agree with you on what will happen if the minimum wage gets increased if you can show me evidence to support these claims. Because I have not seen any so far. But I have seen plenty of evidence to refute them. And by evidence, I do not mean links to reputable economists. That's like claiming the Bible is fact by citing the pope. No, I want history. That's what I want. But history in Economics is so hard to cite because of outliers. I mean, I could say some change caused the oil prices to spike in 1981, but there are so many other factors that had to occur to get that to happen that it is futile. To quote Joseph Stiglitz on the last federal minimum wage increase: "[it] was totally swamped by other factors going on in the economy" I am willing to go into the minimum wage thing with an open mind, however, I have my doubts. I think that the current housing situation will play integral part in what happens. I think that the ecological stance the democrats take will impact what happens, if they open up drilling in places and gas prices go down, then the housing market goes back up (a small amount). You say "flawed theory" but I don't know what you mean? You mean supply and demand? I am just using my understanding of economics as a whole to try and understand the minimum wage thing. I will say that I read Alan Kreuger's study of fast food minimum wage and it's definitely interesting. Fast food places with higher minimum wage were able to keep people longer, hire more efficient workers, etc. I do think that's sociological more than economic but that's beside the point. I guess the catch overall is not something that economics can predict, instead we need a sociologist that can tell us how people will react. My first instinct is that people will spend more, booming the economy a little, but there will also be an increase in debt (since most of this country is in debt anyway). -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 09:43 AM
Post
#42
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
Oh, my thing with the consolidation of air traffic control facilities is that the current system, if stuck to, works. If you fly US Air or United (can't remember which), they let you listen to the radio chatter of the ATC and it's pretty amazing to hear how efficient they are.
I've tuned into the ATC and ground control here and it makes my jaw drop. If anything, Congress should be pushing for ground radar at all commercial airline facilities. Most runway incursions occur in bad weather in places where ground radar is not in place. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 11:47 PM |