Why you F-ing with my homeboy? Options

[Throwdown]

my point is there is 3 general mods and additional specific forum mods for a total of 10 mods.

there is what, 30 "active" members on this forum? most forums you are thinking of have a much smaller mod:user ratio. so what if he doesnt post a link and put what the news story said in quotes? if its posted like that take it like that, with a grain of salt and less credible then someone who links the direct article. he isnt posting trannys or someshit in the otherwise work safe forums, so at worst its causing you 15seconds of delay to google the article.

WINNER

[woody]

seriously, get a napkin, and clean the cum out of your ears. you sound like a bitch

[Spectatrix]

I agree that having 13 mods is excessive. However, it doesn't make the site "professional", nor does it necessarily mean that it's over-moderated.

We based the news article rules partially on the bazillion complaints that people had made before about TTULow's posting habits. Some of the mods just wanted to ignore low's threads, but Lance asked us to delete his threads if he violated the rules. Not the mods... LANCE.

So if you wanna bitch about us enforcing the rules, take it up with Lance. He's the one who made that call.

And Jim doesn't come and post to "defend" me any more than you post to "defend" Jessica, Will. It may appear like that, but that's not the case.

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: Mar 3 2006, 12:32 PM

[Throwdown]

i have no problem with the rules per se, only with how many unneeded mods there are and how the rules are currently enforced

[Spectatrix]

i have no problem with the rules per se, only with how many unneeded mods there are and how the rules are currently enforced

What do you disagree with in how the rules are enforced? (I'm seriously asking here)

[moebary]

We do have a lot of mods, but most of them do little to nothing because they haven't had to. I don't think there's been a problem with too many mods so far.

[Throwdown]

What do you disagree with in how the rules are enforced? (I'm seriously asking here)

i probably shouldnt be commenting, since i honestly havent read all the damn rules of each forum (who has?).

it seems mods are way too move and delete happy - and yes, this includes my girlfriend, who i got pissed at for deleting one of my posts. mods have already gotten in turf wars over other mods moving stuff in and out of their forums.

[Jim]

What's wrong with moving a topic to where it belongs?

[moebary]

i probably shouldnt be commenting, since i honestly havent read all the damn rules of each forum (who has?).

it seems mods are way too move and delete happy - and yes, this includes my girlfriend, who i got pissed at for deleting one of my posts. mods have already gotten in turf wars over other mods moving stuff in and out of their forums.

I agree with Will on every forum not having to have it's own rules thread. I didn't add one to Health & Fitness because it's pretty self-explanatory and it goes with the general rules.

[JRockTTU]

Try reading the general rules, dumbass: http://www.techsans.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=105

Sorry I didn't feel like searching through the 14 rules threads there are on this damn site. In the future, I will try to cater posting style to whatever forum I might be in. Stop being a bitch.

[Spectatrix]

i probably shouldnt be commenting, since i honestly havent read all the damn rules of each forum (who has?).

it seems mods are way too move and delete happy - and yes, this includes my girlfriend, who i got pissed at for deleting one of my posts. mods have already gotten in turf wars over other mods moving stuff in and out of their forums.

Well... I think most of that happened right at the beginning of the restart (except for deleting low's threads). I haven't noticed many moves/deletes in the last few days and we're actually talking about things in the moderator's forum before doing something questionable.

[Throwdown]

oh, and additionally: yes, i agree the old board had problems. i agree it needed fixing. but the wrong things are being fixed. honestly, who gives a shit if an occasional thread is in the wrong place? and who cares if an occasional nsfw pic is posted, other than it might get you in trouble for slacking off at work? techsans has never been a "safe for work" site, so why start trying to make it one now?

the problem wasnt any of those things, it stuff like dipshit forsaken starting 75 threads with one video each in em. stuff like greg and zetec coming in to threads with one word replies to up their postcount

itd be nice to find a happy medium between the old board and the new board.

in no woody im not just whining, these are valid complaints. ive enjoyed the board for three years, and now its pretty much sucks due to various things. it isnt as fun as it once was

[Jim]

I have no need to "defend" Christine, there's no real point in doing so. She can take care of herself, she's a big girl.

What I do have to say is this: The rules at Techsans are very, very laid back. I mean, seriously. And they're easy to follow. If you don't follow them, you'll get your posts deleted, thread deleted, moved, and what not. That's simple. Follow the rules and you won't have it done to you. If you can't take the time to read them and then you start bitching about them I have this to say: Shut the fuck up.

Oh, and like I tell the people at the forums I admin, if you don't like the rules, you don't have to stay.

[moebary]

Oh, and like I tell the people at the forums I admin, if you don't like the rules, you don't have to stay.

Except we want people to stay

[JRockTTU]

So TTULow can't post a thread without a source, but Forsaken can have an Avatar with clitoral stimulation in it?