IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Scientists teleport light and matter, in Europe
Mommy
post Oct 6 2006, 01:00 PM
Post #16


New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008


Group: Members
Posts: 8,635
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Port Wentworth, GA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (impala454 @ Oct 6 2006, 01:58 PM)
relatively you would not age. time is relative, hence why einstein called his theory "relativity". time is relative to the speed you're traveling.

so are you saying that when you take an airplane flight from one point to another point within the same time zone, you are still travelling in time?

because you are travelling faster than those on the ground
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Oct 6 2006, 01:03 PM
Post #17





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Jessica @ Oct 6 2006, 02:00 PM)
so are you saying that when you take an airplane flight from one point to another point within the same time zone, you are still travelling in time?

because you are travelling faster than those on the ground

yep. but it's so infantessimal it doesn't matter to us.

if you look at the speeds we're talking about you see how irrelavant it is:

Speed of light: 11,000,000 mph
Airplane: 400 mph
Human: 4mph

and this is also all relative to the earth rotating on its axis and around the sun, the sun moving through the milky way, milkway through blah blah you get the picture.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Oct 6 2006, 03:03 PM
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



they did an experiment where they had two clocks set to the same time, put one in one of those ridiculously fast jets and when it returned to earth it was 1 second ahead of the earth-ground clock

it was in the news awhile back because it just gave more credence to Einstein’s relativity
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Oct 6 2006, 03:06 PM
Post #19





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 6 2006, 10:17 AM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montauk_Project

There, now you can sex up anybody who reads that. tongue.gif

yeah but i bet no one gets my subtle references to other unrelated stuff, and the references from preston nichol's blueprints
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Billy
post Oct 6 2006, 03:09 PM
Post #20


N 0 t h i n g


Group: Members
Posts: 1,449
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 54



QUOTE (Overlord @ Oct 6 2006, 03:03 PM)
they did an experiment where they had two clocks set to the same time, put one in one of those ridiculously fast jets and when it returned to earth it was 1 second ahead of the earth-ground clock

it was in the news awhile back because it just gave more credence to Einstein’s relativity

Vibration interference.


--------------------


QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:22 PM) *
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Oct 6 2006, 03:16 PM
Post #21





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (Renegadepeon @ Oct 6 2006, 04:09 PM)
Vibration interference.

i would somehow doubt it was a mechanical clock
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Oct 6 2006, 03:59 PM
Post #22





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



they used those super accurate stratum 1 timing devices, i forget if it was a cesium beam or a hydrogen maser though

probably cesium since it's hundreds of thousands of dollars cheaper
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Oct 6 2006, 05:10 PM
Post #23





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (Overlord @ Oct 6 2006, 03:03 PM)
they did an experiment where they had two clocks set to the same time, put one in one of those ridiculously fast jets and when it returned to earth it was 1 second ahead of the earth-ground clock

it was in the news awhile back because it just gave more credence to Einstein’s relativity

It should've been 1 second *behind* the ground clock... that what you meant?


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post Oct 6 2006, 05:12 PM
Post #24





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 6 2006, 05:10 PM)
It should've been 1 second *behind* the ground clock... that what you meant?

probably, i remember it was 1 second off
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xentither
post Oct 6 2006, 07:43 PM
Post #25


Never fear, citizen, Art Major Man is here!
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 415
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Here
Member No.: 47



fucking maser. Damn CPU boss global 199 bitch slap my ass.


--------------------
Where do we start?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th August 2026 - 07:12 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com