 Scientists teleport light and matter, in Europe |
  |
| Scientists teleport light and matter, in Europe |
 Oct 5 2006, 04:22 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 2,558 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Seoul, South Korea Member No.: 28  |
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/1...reut/index.html
QUOTE Scientists teleport two different objects
POSTED: 2036 GMT (0436 HKT), October 4, 2006 LONDON, England (Reuters) -- Beaming people in Star Trek fashion is still in the realms of science fiction but physicists in Denmark have teleported information from light to matter bringing quantum communication and computing closer to reality. Until now scientists have teleported similar objects such as light or single atoms over short distances from one spot to another in a split second. But Professor Eugene Polzik and his team at the Niels Bohr Institute at Copenhagen University in Denmark have made a breakthrough by using both light and matter. "It is one step further because for the first time it involves teleportation between light and matter, two different objects. One is the carrier of information and the other one is the storage medium," Polzik explained in an interview on Wednesday. The experiment involved for the first time a macroscopic atomic object containing thousands of billions of atoms. They also teleported the information a distance of half a meter but believe it can be extended further. "Teleportation between two single atoms had been done two years ago by two teams but this was done at a distance of a fraction of a millimeter," Polzik, of the Danish National Research Foundation Center for Quantum Optics, explained. "Our method allows teleportation to be taken over longer distances because it involves light as the carrier of entanglement," he added. Quantum entanglement involves entwining two or more particles without physical contact. Although teleportation is associated with the science-fiction series Star Trek, no one is likely to be beamed anywhere soon. But the achievement of Polzik's team, in collaboration with the theorist Ignacio Cirac of the Max Planck Institute for Quantum Optics in Garching, Germany, marks an advancement in the field of quantum information and computers, which could transmit and process information in a way that was impossible before. "It is really about teleporting information from one site to another site. Quantum information is different from classical information in the sense that it cannot be measured. It has much higher information capacity and it cannot be eavesdropped on. The transmission of quantum information can be made unconditionally secure," said Polzik whose research is reported in the journal Nature. Quantum computing requires manipulation of information contained in the quantum states, which include physical properties such as energy, motion and magnetic field, of the atoms. "Creating entanglement is a very important step but there are two more steps at least to perform teleportation. We have succeeded in making all three steps -- that is entanglement, quantum measurement and quantum feedback," he added. Copyright 2006 Reuters. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. --------------------  |
 |
 
|
|
Oct 5 2006, 08:25 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
Interesting...
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 08:02 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
So I wonder if this will make "time" travel possible... I guess it will just take time.
Timeline anyone? -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:10 AM
Post
#4
|
|
 N 0 t h i n g Group: Members Posts: 1,449 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 54 |
By definition, it is impossible to travel "back" in time, since time is a constantly forward moving dimension.
--------------------  QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:22 PM)  |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:14 AM
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
QUOTE (Renegadepeon @ Oct 6 2006, 09:10 AM) By definition, it is impossible to travel "back" in time, since time is a constantly forward moving dimension. you can change the flow of time, make it flow backwards i have several delta t antennas connected to rife resonators at various locations around the globe along ley lines... with the flip of a switch i can rewind time to yesterday a montauk boy that i deprogrammed and unbrainwashed gave me the blueprints under hypnosis, next we plan to get back at the russians for generating hurricane katrina from stolen project rainbow and orgone technology and if anyone actually knows what the montauk project is, lets have sex |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:20 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (Renegadepeon @ Oct 6 2006, 09:10 AM) By definition, it is impossible to travel "back" in time, since time is a constantly forward moving dimension. Fine, ruin my dream to go back to WWII and be a P-51 pilot. I've read that some people don't think that time is singular in direction and that it is just a function of space (all directions). -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:24 AM
Post
#7
|
|
 New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Overlord @ Oct 6 2006, 10:14 AM) and if anyone actually knows what the montauk project is, lets have sex I think Impala knows... 
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:32 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (Overlord @ Oct 6 2006, 09:14 AM) and if anyone actually knows what the montauk project is, lets have sex Reynold's Wrap Aluminum Foil Division called, they said thanks for keeping them in business during a rough summer. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 09:46 AM
Post
#9
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,795 Joined: 29-September 06 Member No.: 327 |
QUOTE (Hartmann @ Oct 6 2006, 09:32 AM) Reynold's Wrap Aluminum Foil Division called, they said thanks for keeping them in business during a rough summer. hahahaha WW2? fuck that...I'd go back to 1997. |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 10:17 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 |
QUOTE (Overlord @ Oct 6 2006, 09:14 AM) and if anyone actually knows what the montauk project is, lets have sex http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montauk_Project There, now you can sex up anybody who reads that. 
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 10:26 AM
Post
#11
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (Renegadepeon @ Oct 6 2006, 10:10 AM) By definition, it is impossible to travel "back" in time, since time is a constantly forward moving dimension. it is possible, if you can ever find a way to move faster than light |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 10:35 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Oct 6 2006, 11:26 AM) it is possible, if you can ever find a way to move faster than light why is that? because its the fastest known traveller in the universe? Can time increments not exceed that of the speed of light? Im just curious. I mean, to me that makes no sense because time has instances that are shorter than the "time" it would take for light to travel a distance. Im probably wrong though... I didnt take physics in college....only high school so a lot of this sometimes goes over my head. If someone would like to explain that though, that would be cool |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 12:00 PM
Post
#13
|
|
 Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
QUOTE (Jessica @ Oct 6 2006, 10:35 AM) why is that? because its the fastest known traveller in the universe? Can time increments not exceed that of the speed of light? Im just curious. I mean, to me that makes no sense because time has instances that are shorter than the "time" it would take for light to travel a distance. Im probably wrong though... I didnt take physics in college....only high school so a lot of this sometimes goes over my head. If someone would like to explain that though, that would be cool Technically you could travle in time if you had the ability to go faster then the speed of light because you would not age, while everyone on earth did. So it would be like traveling in time. Time is a construct, there is no past and there is no future. There is only the Now. -------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 12:01 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
QUOTE (Spivey @ Oct 6 2006, 01:00 PM) Technically you could travle in time if you had the ability to go faster then the speed of light because you would not age, while everyone on earth did. So it would be like traveling in time. Time is a construct, there is no past and there is no future. There is only the Now. why couldnt you age? |
|
|
|
|
Oct 6 2006, 12:58 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (Jessica @ Oct 6 2006, 01:01 PM) why couldnt you age? relatively you would not age. time is relative, hence why einstein called his theory "relativity". time is relative to the speed you're traveling. |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th August 2026 - 06:20 AM |
