IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> NSA wiretaps unconstitutional
pebkac
post Aug 17 2006, 11:38 AM
Post #1


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/17/dom...t.ap/index.html

QUOTE
DETROIT, Michigan (AP) -- A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government's warrantless wiretapping program is unconstitutional and ordered an immediate halt to it.

U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in Detroit became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency's program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed the lawsuit on behalf of journalists, scholars and lawyers who say the program has made it difficult for them to do their jobs. They believe many of their overseas contacts are likely targets of the program, which involves secretly taping conversations between people in the U.S. and people in other countries.

The government argued that the program is well within the president's authority, but said proving that would require revealing state secrets.

The ACLU said the state-secrets argument was irrelevant because the Bush administration already had publicly revealed enough information about the program for Taylor to rule.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Aug 17 2006, 11:46 AM
Post #2





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



I was just about to post this! w00t.gif w00t.gif w00t.gif

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: Aug 17 2006, 11:46 AM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Aug 17 2006, 11:57 AM
Post #3


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



haha, oh those hippies.

a woman judge, too. what's next, women voting and driving?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seussninja
post Aug 17 2006, 12:04 PM
Post #4


FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK


Group: Members
Posts: 1,673
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (lamont's lament @ Aug 17 2006, 11:57 AM)
haha, oh those hippies.

a woman judge, too. what's next, women voting and driving?

yeah fuck those hippies, i want america to watch me masturbate
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GOB
post Aug 17 2006, 12:54 PM
Post #5


monogamous gays & stem cells


Group: Members
Posts: 3,789
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 8



QUOTE (Seussninja @ Aug 17 2006, 01:04 PM)
yeah fuck those hippies, i want america to watch me masturbate

that's the american dream
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Aug 17 2006, 11:54 PM
Post #6





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



QUOTE (lamont's lament @ Aug 17 2006, 11:57 AM)
haha, oh those hippies.

a woman judge, too. what's next, women voting and driving?

i've been saying it for years.

this country started going straight to shit when women started to vote


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 11th August 2026 - 10:39 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com