IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Congress getting richer, again
knucklehead
post Jun 22 2006, 05:51 PM
Post #31





Group: Members
Posts: 181
Joined: 9-March 06
Member No.: 114



QUOTE (Psykopath @ Jun 22 2006, 05:44 PM)
plus, no taxes and insane benefits.

Yeah for sure. I was just looking through this site, it's got some interesting information from a few years ago, like the fact that those that retire after a certain number of years of full service get about $52,000 a year in retirement pay. And I'm sure some get a hell of a lot more.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa031200a.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
celebritygooner
post Jun 22 2006, 06:19 PM
Post #32





Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 27-February 06
Member No.: 92



QUOTE (Psykopath @ Jun 22 2006, 06:15 AM)
Side question: Can anyone here put up a valid arguement for the elimination of a minimum wage?

What you all are saying about people earning more and spending more is all well and good, but it doesn't work in a global economy.

Phil Knight's job isn't to make life good for Americans or to be a hero and make lots of political points, his job is to make a huge profit for shareholders. If you force him to pay an American $6 or $20 or whatever dollars an hour to do a job that a Chinese person can do, and is willing to do, for $2 an hour, why WOULDN'T he hire the Chinese person?

Spectrix make a wonderful point ... remember the labor riots in France a couple months ago? The European social model is basically minimum wage taken to the extreme ... the French (parliament???) tried to pass a law saying employers were free to fire a new (couple months) young worker for no reason, because currently in France it is almost impossible to do it; the reaction was so negative (HOW COULD ANYBODY ... *GASP* LOSE THEIR JOB?!!??!!?

But if you knew you were required to pay somebody more than they were worth and that you had no legal means to fire them if they were idiots, why would anybody hire anybody ever?

Europe has tried this and failed miserably at it, they tried it in the 1940's and 50's, that's the reason the United States enjoyed, basically, 50 years of uninterrupted prosperity -- Europe had no manufacturing sector (war damage) and they had the idea that everybody deserved free money from the government just for being them ... Americans worked harder, had more and better infrastructure, and thus we were the production and export capital of the world. We aren't anymore. Minimum wage and social welfare and compassion and OSHA and pensions make it too expensive to produce goods, so we don't. China does. Have you checked the trade defecit? I wonder who's next in line for world supremacy ...

Followup question: Can you name anything France manufactures and exports? If you can't, you now know why their economy is a disaster, and you've just seen America circa 2060.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Jun 22 2006, 06:28 PM
Post #33





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (celebritygooner @ Jun 22 2006, 06:19 PM)
Followup question: Can you name anything France manufactures and exports?

Evian and Perrier bottled water. laugh.gif


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Divergent Realit...
post Jun 22 2006, 06:35 PM
Post #34



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



wine

rolleyes.gif


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Billy
post Jun 22 2006, 07:43 PM
Post #35


N 0 t h i n g


Group: Members
Posts: 1,449
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 54



It's also cheaper to live in China than it is in America. Just like in Mexico. There are laws currently being made about exploiting this fact. A dollar is worth a lot more in China than it is in America. But guess what, once our two economies level, that'll change. And then where do the manufacturer's go to next? Yeah, who ever has the weakest economy at the time. And that's why laws need to be made. Capitalism fails on a global level, unless countries create laws to protect their working class.

But this whole argument is moot. Companies CAN afford a minimum wage hike. Labor doesn't tend to be much of the expense of a company. The people who work so hard and give up so much of their lives to keep this country productive NEED to be protected. And an increase in minimum wage does just that. A minimum wage increase won't increase prices to the consumer in a competitive economy, if companies can afford it. And they can.


--------------------


QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:22 PM) *
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Jun 22 2006, 10:29 PM
Post #36


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (celebritygooner @ Jun 22 2006, 07:19 PM)
What you all are saying about people earning more and spending more is all well and good, but it doesn't work in a global economy.

Phil Knight's job isn't to make life good for Americans or to be a hero and make lots of political points, his job is to make a huge profit for shareholders. If you force him to pay an American $6 or $20 or whatever dollars an hour to do a job that a Chinese person can do, and is willing to do, for $2 an hour, why WOULDN'T he hire the Chinese person?

Spectrix make a wonderful point ... remember the labor riots in France a couple months ago? The European social model is basically minimum wage taken to the extreme ... the French (parliament???) tried to pass a law saying employers were free to fire a new (couple months) young worker for no reason, because currently in France it is almost impossible to do it; the reaction was so negative (HOW COULD ANYBODY ... *GASP* LOSE THEIR JOB?!!??!!?

But if you knew you were required to pay somebody more than they were worth and that you had no legal means to fire them if they were idiots, why would anybody hire anybody ever?

Europe has tried this and failed miserably at it, they tried it in the 1940's and 50's, that's the reason the United States enjoyed, basically, 50 years of uninterrupted prosperity -- Europe had no manufacturing sector (war damage) and they had the idea that everybody deserved free money from the government just for being them ... Americans worked harder, had more and better infrastructure, and thus we were the production and export capital of the world. We aren't anymore. Minimum wage and social welfare and compassion and OSHA and pensions make it too expensive to produce goods, so we don't. China does. Have you checked the trade defecit? I wonder who's next in line for world supremacy ...

Followup question: Can you name anything France manufactures and exports? If you can't, you now know why their economy is a disaster, and you've just seen America circa 2060.

I agree with you 100%. It would be best for the economy if everyone got paid $2 an hour just like they do in China.

BTW, have you seen the living conditions in China?


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Jun 23 2006, 12:16 AM
Post #37





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



170K...plus money from the running for office...plus "gifts"...plus expensise accts...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
celebritygooner
post Jun 24 2006, 05:12 PM
Post #38





Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 27-February 06
Member No.: 92



QUOTE (pebkac @ Jun 22 2006, 10:29 PM)
I agree with you 100%. It would be best for the economy if everyone got paid $2 an hour just like they do in China.

BTW, have you seen the living conditions in China?

I didn't say you had to like it, but that's the way it is. If you artificially inflate the cost of American labor, Chinese (the comptuer I'm typing on), Taiwanese (the TV i'm watching), Brazilian (the banana i'm eating), Mexican (the futon i'm sitting on), Indian (the t-shirt i'm wearing), Pakistani (the shorts i'm wearing) and Bangladeshi (the sandals i'm wearing) labor will happily take up the slack.

It's easy to take a sharp verbal jab at someone about the standard of living in China ... it's hard to have a functioning economy without any discernable labor class.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2026 - 08:57 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com