IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 500 WMD's found in Iraq since 2003
nickluto
post Jun 22 2006, 12:09 PM
Post #16


The Transient Aggie


Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 21





--------------------


A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Jun 22 2006, 12:36 PM
Post #17


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (neoshaman @ Jun 22 2006, 11:58 AM)
It looks like that WMD story was discredited a long time ago.

Only one lone senator (Rick Santorum) and right-wing political TV show pundit Sean Hannity are clinging to this story.

http://www.newshounds.us/2006/06/22/sean_h...wmd_in_iraq.php

You can watch a video of Jim Angle debunking the WMD story right on Fox news.
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/06/22.html#a8810

Wow. Why does this not surprise me?


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Jun 22 2006, 11:56 PM
Post #18





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



QUOTE (nickluto @ Jun 22 2006, 12:09 PM)

the US is not here. it's a hollywood effect


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Jun 23 2006, 04:55 AM
Post #19





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



nobody here reads the full articles. the point isn't that we found 15 year old chemical weapons, but this:
QUOTE
The weapons are thought to be manufactured before 1991 so they would not be proof of an ongoing WMD program in the 1990s. But they do show that Saddam Hussein was lying when he said all weapons had been destroyed, and it shows that years of on-again, off-again weapons inspections did not uncover these munitions.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
pebkac
post Jun 23 2006, 09:29 AM
Post #20


From Atlantis to Interzone


Group: Global Moderators
Posts: 2,512
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Somewhere in space and time
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Jun 23 2006, 05:55 AM)
nobody here reads the full articles. the point isn't that we found 15 year old chemical weapons, but this:

Yes. You're right. The fact that Saddam had 15 year old WMDs that weren't in any useful state was the perfect justification for going to war.


--------------------
QUOTE (Spectatrix @ Oct 13 2006, 09:51 PM) *
Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome!



"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss)

"An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Jun 23 2006, 10:40 AM
Post #21





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



QUOTE (pebkac @ Jun 23 2006, 09:29 AM)
Yes. You're right. The fact that Saddam had 15 year old WMDs that weren't in any useful state was the perfect justification for going to war.

yes, and you can't read either. i never said it was justification, did i? i was merely pointing out the point of the article. thanks.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2026 - 08:27 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com