ready to start using "ameros" instead of dollars? Options

[Seeker]

http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=14965

North American Union to Replace USA?

by Jerome R. Corsi
Posted May 19, 2006

President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.

Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

The blueprint President Bush is following was laid out in a 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community" published by the left-of-center Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The CFR report connects the dots between the Bush administration's actual policy on illegal immigration and the drive to create the North American Union:

    At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action. We welcome this important development and offer this report to add urgency and specific recommendations to strengthen their efforts.

What is the plan? Simple, erase the borders. The plan is contained in a "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" little noticed when President Bush and President Fox created it in March 2005:

    In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

    To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

The perspective of the CFR report allows us to see President Bush's speech to the nation as nothing more than public relations posturing and window dressing. No wonder President Vincente Fox called President Bush in a panic after the speech. How could the President go back on his word to Mexico by actually securing our border? Not to worry, President Bush reassured President Fox. The National Guard on the border were only temporary, meant to last only as long until the public forgets about the issue, as has always been the case in the past.

The North American Union plan, which Vincente Fox has every reason to presume President Bush is still following, calls for the only border to be around the North American Union -- not between any of these countries. Or, as the CFR report stated:

    The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.

Discovering connections like this between the CFR recommendations and Bush administration policy gives credence to the argument that President Bush favors amnesty and open borders, as he originally said. Moreover, President Bush most likely continues to consider groups such as the Minuteman Project to be "vigilantes," as he has also said in response to a reporter's question during the March 2005 meeting with President Fox.

Why doesn’t President Bush just tell the truth? His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do. If a fence is going to be built on our border with Mexico, evidently the Minuteman Project is going to have to build the fence themselves. Will President Bush protect America's sovereignty, or is this too a job the Minuteman Project will have to do for him?

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.

[schwab]

yeah sure, since you know that is why he deployed troops along the border

[Seeker]

6,000 national guard troops who aren't allowed to carry weapons or make arrests is a joke, these guys will basically just be sitting out in the desert scratching their ass and reporting border crossers to the authorities (who will continue to do nothing)

bush deploying troops on the border is just an attempt to assuage the public about illegal immigration

second, in case you haven't noticed bush fully supports the senate's illegal immigrant amnesty bill

[Guest_CANNONBALL_*]

6,000 national guard troops are a joke

fixed...

[Spectatrix]

Mexicans don't like gringos enough to do this.
Canada hates the US almost as much as Europe does.
Bush is power hungry and wouldn't do something like this that would dilute that power (giving up US sovereignty? HA!).

So yeah, this is SUCH a load of crap. Even IF these three leaders were planning something like this, they'd require the approval of their governments and/or citizens and that sure as hell ain't gonna happen.

[Seeker]

Also, go to the offical website: http://www.spp.gov/

It's the government's "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" web site. Taken at face value it looks like a bunch of warm fuzzy "we'll take care of each other and have lots of free trade" crap. Read between the lines and it basically details how the U.S. will give up it's sovereignty. Ever wondered what was behind all the pandering to Mexico regarding illegal immigration? Well, now you know.

[pebkac]

Also, go to the offical website: http://www.spp.gov/

It's the government's "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America" web site. Taken at face value it looks like a bunch of warm fuzzy "we'll take care of each other and have lots of free trade" crap. Read between the lines and it basically details how the U.S. will give up it's sovereignty. Ever wondered what was behind all the pandering to Mexico regarding illegal immigration? Well, now you know.

...

I don't see anything on there detailing how we're planning on giving up our sovereignty.

[impala454]

just more lance conspiracy bs. oh well at least conspiracy theory is sorta fun.

[Divergent Realit...]

and once we get that going it will be easier and cheaper to build a wall between mexico and guatemala/belize.

then fortress america will be one step closer to completion.

praise bushjesus!

[jonathan83]

Mexicans don't like gringos enough to do this.
Canada hates the US almost as much as Europe does.

Americans would be against this more than the other two.
Mexicans would die to have an opportunity like this. Their economy would go straight up. Canadians don't hate us like you think. Just our government. I work with a lot of them.

[Dogmeat]

I don't think Bush "has a hand in this" so to speak but it's gonna happen within our lifetime .... whether we like it or not.

[pebkac]

Americans would be against this more than the other two.
Mexicans would die to have an opportunity like this. Their economy would go straight up. Canadians don't hate us like you think. Just our government. I work with a lot of them.

Dunno. Lot of Canadians I've talked to genuinely hate us.