IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> more proof that cell phone towers cause cancer
Seeker
post May 12 2006, 09:46 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/pho...6940676777.html

7 people who worked on the top floor of a building which had a tower on the roof came down with brain tumors

TOLD YA BITCHES
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dauss
post May 12 2006, 09:48 AM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Lubbock, TX
Member No.: 20



what if you use one of these?


--------------------
Beers that I have had, updated July 5th, 2009: 1,548
My Beer List

"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" - Samuel Johnson

"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ" - Mahatma Gandhi
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seeker
post May 12 2006, 09:53 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 5,275
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 2



i try not to use anything wireless because the radio/micro waves/electromagnetic fields upset your body's internal electrical signals/voltage, causes cells to vibrate, and destroys DNA

the signal on one of those bluetooth headsets is probably pretty weak, it'd prob take years before you noticed any effects, it's sorta like slow boiling your body
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post May 12 2006, 10:50 AM
Post #4





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



And yet...

QUOTE
Australian Medical Association president Mukesh Haikerwal said there was no proof of a connection but "if you get clusters of disease it's sensible to investigate."

Dr John Gall, from private health company Southern Medical Services, which has been called in to assess the sick, said last night three of those affected had tumours showing symptoms consistent with radiation.

But he said there was no causal link with the building based on preliminary observations.


Correlation != causality.

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: May 12 2006, 10:50 AM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
M1N10N
post May 13 2006, 11:38 PM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 161
Joined: 28-February 06
Member No.: 97



they were closer to the sun and absorbed more radiation obviously
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th August 2026 - 09:19 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com