![]() ![]() |
Apr 6 2006, 09:15 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/04/05/baby....r.ap/index.html
QUOTE An argument at a baby shower escalated into a brawl in which one man was shot and the pregnant guest of honor was beaten with a stick, police said. Haha, Mexicans. P.S. Cathryn, should we ban sticks since someone might kill someone with a stick? We'll also have to ban trees so people can't get wood to make sticks. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 09:17 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
Lance, there is only ONE use for a gun, and that is killing something. The main use of a stick, historically, is not beating the shit out of someone.
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 09:22 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
so defending yourself isn't a use for a gun?
|
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 09:23 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
QUOTE (Lancifer @ Apr 6 2006, 09:22 AM) so defending yourself isn't a use for a gun? what? Are you going to hit the person attacking you with your gun or are you going to shoot him? |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 09:28 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
QUOTE (Seussninja @ Apr 6 2006, 09:23 AM) what? Are you going to hit the person attacking you with your gun or are you going to shoot him? if everyone is armed no one would be attacking anyone if the gov bans guns from lawful citizens then only criminals would have them, then instead of the power being balanced it's one-sided |
|
|
|
| Guest_CANNONBALL_* |
Apr 6 2006, 09:34 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Guests |
the problem with the 2nd amendment is that any ol' asshole can own a gun (if not a felon).
I am a facist. I think you should prove your worth and knowledge before: -owing a gun -voting -breeding greg there are other uses for firearms than killing a human. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 10:20 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,761 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Lubbock/Dubai Member No.: 57 |
i was about to post the same article and say damn mexicans after it....
my favorite quote QUOTE The argument, over whether the woman let their 5-year-old daughter drink beer, escalated and drew in two other people
-------------------- bored...so i did this
http://beerlist.wetpaint.com/ |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 11:57 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK Group: Members Posts: 1,673 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 11 |
QUOTE (CANNONBALL @ Apr 6 2006, 09:34 AM) the problem with the 2nd amendment is that any ol' asshole can own a gun (if not a felon). I am a facist. I think you should prove your worth and knowledge before: -owing a gun -voting -breeding greg there are other uses for firearms than killing a human. I said killing in general, not just a human. If thats the case, why not just legalize hunting rifles? That removes the whole "but what about hunting lol" bit Gun Control isn't a big issue of mine but making a comparison from sticks to guns is. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 12:17 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 105 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 117 |
bet the woman that was beat to death wished it was a gun instead
oh, and owning a gun for protection of ones self from others is a fundemental right. |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 12:54 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Agents Posts: 4,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lu-bok Member No.: 41 |
QUOTE (CANNONBALL @ Apr 6 2006, 09:34 AM) I am a facist. I think you should prove your worth and knowledge before: -owing a gun -voting -breeding so you need babies to own a gun? -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_CANNONBALL_* |
Apr 6 2006, 12:57 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Guests |
QUOTE (Divergent Reality @ Apr 6 2006, 12:54 PM) so you need babies to own a gun? wtf? |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 01:02 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Agents Posts: 4,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lu-bok Member No.: 41 |
QUOTE (CANNONBALL @ Apr 6 2006, 12:57 PM) wtf? so you need the same credentials to have a baby as owning a gun. so you need babies to own a gun. -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_CANNONBALL_* |
Apr 6 2006, 01:22 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Guests |
still...you are confused. and your logic line flawed because of that.
I quote QUOTE I am a facist. I think you should prove your worth and knowledge before: -owing a gun -voting -breeding perhaps I mislead you into thinking that you need the same knowledge to vote as to have a kid, but that is not what I think I implied. I said I think you should prove your worth and knowledge before *list* seperate credentials and tests applicable to the specific "right" in question. you're a smart motherfucker...pull your head outta your ass man! |
|
|
|
Apr 6 2006, 01:24 PM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Agents Posts: 4,026 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lu-bok Member No.: 41 |
ive still got the mental image of a babygun, where you just cut open a kid and put the gun up its torso. then BLAM. hidden gun. suprise the competiton.
and thsoe kind of replies are the kind you get when i just skim the replies. -------------------- |
|
|
|
| Guest_CANNONBALL_* |
Apr 6 2006, 01:25 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Guests |
like driving...ya know how you have to be 16, take drivers ed and pass, then take a test and pass?
but for many MOSR important facets in life. it is orwellian in scope, and will never happen....but I would like to see it. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th August 2026 - 10:39 AM |