IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> war
cool or not cool?
cool or not cool?
cool [ 3 ] ** [23.08%]
not cool [ 10 ] ** [76.92%]
Total Votes: 13
Guests cannot vote 
Throwdown
post Feb 22 2006, 11:34 PM
Post #1


fuck you!


Group: Members
Posts: 641
Joined: 22-February 06
From: fuck you!
Member No.: 19



vote


--------------------
only here to talk sports occationally
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seussninja
post Feb 22 2006, 11:34 PM
Post #2


FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK


Group: Members
Posts: 1,673
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 11



what is it good for?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Throwdown
post Feb 22 2006, 11:35 PM
Post #3


fuck you!


Group: Members
Posts: 641
Joined: 22-February 06
From: fuck you!
Member No.: 19



absolutely nothing!


--------------------
only here to talk sports occationally
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Feb 23 2006, 12:05 AM
Post #4





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



not cool, but sometimes necessary.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
moebary
post Feb 23 2006, 12:10 AM
Post #5


Eric The Sexy


Group: Moderators
Posts: 831
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 30



It made me smile

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Seussninja
post Feb 23 2006, 12:12 AM
Post #6


FFFFFFFUCKKKKKKKKKKKK


Group: Members
Posts: 1,673
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (moebary @ Feb 23 2006, 12:10 AM)
It made me smile



Band of Erics

band of erics

DAMN THAT EDIT BUTTON BEING RIGHT NEXT TO THE QUOTE ONE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
woody
post Feb 23 2006, 12:12 AM
Post #7





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,499
Joined: 23-February 06
From: El Paso Texas
Member No.: 32



its needed


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cmac
post Feb 23 2006, 12:56 AM
Post #8





Group: Moderators
Posts: 1,591
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 31



not cool
never necessary


--------------------
Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Feb 23 2006, 01:13 AM
Post #9





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



QUOTE (cmac @ Feb 23 2006, 12:56 AM)
never necessary

so one nation should let another willingly take it over?

i.e. WW2, Revolutionary War, Civil War, etc.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fingercuffs
post Feb 23 2006, 01:17 AM
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 180
Joined: 23-February 06
From: San Francisco, CA
Member No.: 37



Now we're back.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jyan
post Feb 23 2006, 01:33 AM
Post #11


New and Improved?


Group: Members
Posts: 629
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Austin, TX
Member No.: 40



Meh. I'm kind of indifferent. Sure, it's helpful from time to time, but a lot of ppl die.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Throwdown
post Feb 23 2006, 01:36 AM
Post #12


fuck you!


Group: Members
Posts: 641
Joined: 22-February 06
From: fuck you!
Member No.: 19



QUOTE (cmac @ Feb 23 2006, 01:35 AM)
QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Feb 23 2006, 01:13 AM)
QUOTE (cmac @ Feb 23 2006, 12:56 AM)
never necessary

so one nation should let another willingly take it over?

i.e. WW2, Revolutionary War, Civil War, etc.

no. if some one tried to attack us, fuck them up at the borders or in the ocean, but don't retaliate.

umm isnt responding to an attack a form of retaliation?


--------------------
only here to talk sports occationally
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cmac
post Feb 23 2006, 01:38 AM
Post #13





Group: Moderators
Posts: 1,591
Joined: 23-February 06
Member No.: 31



i guess a battle, not a war.
i guess i see a war as spending 2 years in a country like iraq.

a retaliation, i see, as after something like that happens turning around and bombing their country

This post has been edited by cmac: Feb 23 2006, 01:39 AM


--------------------
Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
James
post Feb 23 2006, 10:16 AM
Post #14


Fool


Group: Members
Posts: 2,127
Joined: 23-February 06
From: LBB
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (cmac @ Feb 23 2006, 01:35 AM)
QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Feb 23 2006, 01:13 AM)
QUOTE (cmac @ Feb 23 2006, 12:56 AM)
never necessary

so one nation should let another willingly take it over?

i.e. WW2, Revolutionary War, Civil War, etc.

no. if some one tried to attack us, fuck them up at the borders or in the ocean, but don't retaliate.

If you only defend borders, then you're not crippling your opponent, convincing them to stop. You're allowing their supply lines to continue at full force with them basically keeping you at seige. Eventually, you'll realize that the imports you come to depend on are in short supply. Then you'll have to consider surrender. If you get a fanatical enough of an opponent, then their supply of troops to the front lines will be never ending. You'll lose. I don't know about you, but I kind of enjoy speaking English, speaking my mind, and just being able to think/believe whatever I want to.


--------------------
Spam? Isn't that something poor people eat?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th August 2026 - 12:49 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com