IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> obama's new fuel limit by 2016?
chook
post May 20 2009, 08:58 AM
Post #16


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



QUOTE (dauss @ May 19 2009, 10:10 PM) *
So I guess the average mpg of a light duty vehicle in 1975 was 13.1 mpg. In 1987 the average mpg of a light duty vehicle was 22mpg. So a 68% in fuel economy isn't helpful?
source: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fetrends.htm

have they changed the definition since then? Just seeing if they lied Mark Twain Style.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogmeat
post May 20 2009, 09:25 PM
Post #17


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



I think the fuel economy standards should be based off of torque output per pound of fuel burned, not "miles per gallon" ...

That way consumers would at least still have some flexibility in buying what cars they WANT to instead of having the government dictate it to them.

But then again, I was just as opposed to the whole SUV craze as any environmentalist was.

I just don't want this fucking things up for those of us who actually need 6,000-lb vehicles with big motors in them smile.gif


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post May 21 2009, 06:51 AM
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



It shouldn't matter what you need. The government shouldn't be deciding this for us.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dogmeat
post May 21 2009, 03:39 PM
Post #19


DEATH TO ....something?


Group: Members
Posts: 5,618
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Parker, CO
Member No.: 55



QUOTE (impala454 @ May 21 2009, 06:51 AM) *
It shouldn't matter what you need. The government shouldn't be deciding this for us.


I agree, however I also agree that is the stupidest thing ever for idiots in urban Los Angeles or the like to buy 6,000-lb 4WD "SUV's" to drive around town in.


--------------------
I r Ur Gawd!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post May 21 2009, 05:23 PM
Post #20


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



QUOTE (Dogmeat @ May 21 2009, 04:39 PM) *
I agree, however I also agree that is the stupidest thing ever for idiots in urban Los Angeles or the like to buy 6,000-lb 4WD "SUV's" to drive around town in.


but thats their choice.

i had the same similar feelings towards open carry permits in texas. no, i do not want every gang-banger idiot wearing a gun tucked in his belt like it's a necklace, or some other fashion statement. but is it my right to infringe on his choice? not in the slightest.


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 05:49 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com