 John McCain wins debates |
  |
| John McCain wins debates |
 Sep 26 2008, 12:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31  |
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/20...ins_debate.html
 The perfect metaphor for Republicans. Doesn't matter what actually plays out in history, as long as you say you're right and believe it, that all that matters — everyone else will eventually fall in line. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
 |
 
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
Do you think the ad people really wait until after the debate is over to create these ads? Kinda like how they manufacture all the "World Champion" hats for both teams in the NBA finals and such? Like how there's probably a whole city in Africa of little kids running around with "Knicks, 1994 NBA World Champions" hats.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
it would seem common sense to wait until after the event to put the ad into circulation though.
i didn't see eli manning walking around with that superbowl champion hat on before the superbowl. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:15 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 26 2008, 01:00 PM)  Do you think the ad people really wait until after the debate is over to create these ads? Kinda like how they manufacture all the "World Champion" hats for both teams in the NBA finals and such? Like how there's probably a whole city in Africa of little kids running around with "Knicks, 1994 NBA World Champions" hats. it's be nice if they waited til at least the debate took place before the started to shovel the shit at people this makes a candidate (either side) look bad. cause you know, win or lose, that ad is going to run -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:32 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
So, one ad on one page found on the WSJ website = "shovel shit at people"??
Not to mention, I wasn't aware the McCain campaign was responsible for updating the WSJ website. It was probably just some dumbass working for them that put it up too early. |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:35 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
Wall Street Journal / Fox News both owned by Rupert Murdoch's News Corp.
I think that explains plenty. -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:41 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
Oh geez, you're starting to sound like Lance. Yeap, you got them figured out! It's a damn conspiracy to rig the debate!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 01:58 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 26 2008, 01:32 PM) So, one ad on one page found on the WSJ website = "shovel shit at people"?? Not to mention, I wasn't aware the McCain campaign was responsible for updating the WSJ website. It was probably just some dumbass working for them that put it up too early. it was the WSJ, not some random blog out there. i'm sure it gets alot of hits. i'm some dumbass may have been at fault, but the campaign still would have had to pay for the ad...which is the point i was getting at -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 02:04 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
Well maybe they paid for it to be put in tomorrow? I suppose if you guys really think it's some conspiracy or purposely done thing that's your right. I just don't really see the advantage to McCain of doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 26 2008, 02:18 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Admin Posts: 3,402 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (woody @ Sep 26 2008, 02:58 PM) it was the WSJ, not some random blog out there. i'm sure it gets alot of hits. i'm some dumbass may have been at fault, but the campaign still would have had to pay for the ad...which is the point i was getting at Since we don't know the ad agreement with the WSJ we really do not know what happened... The way it works usually is the campaign ad company sends the different ads to the different outlets and pays them for a certain number of days, hits, views, etc. but they do not tell them which ad to publish until shortly before it is supposed to be put out there. I am sure cmac knows this as he's involved in the web. It's just like impala's example of having the hats printed before the big game and someone accidentally dropping one somewhere. Is it irresponsible? Absolutely. Just like it was irresponsible to publish Steve Jobs' obituary... I'm sure there was some Republican conspiracy behind that one.
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2008, 12:34 AM
Post
#11
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
QUOTE (cmac @ Sep 26 2008, 01:40 PM) The perfect metaphor for Republicans. Doesn't matter what actually plays out in history, as long as you say you're right and believe it, that all that matters — everyone else will eventually fall in line. That would be correct except you put in "republicans" instead of "democrats". -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2008, 09:26 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
I was raised on the dairy, BITCH! Group: Members Posts: 3,080 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Cedar Park Member No.: 49 |
QUOTE (THECHICKEN @ Sep 27 2008, 01:34 AM) That would be correct accept you put in "republicans" instead of "democrats". lol so true -------------------- "Ah, y'know it's funny, these people they go to sleep, they think everything's fine, everything's good. They wake up the next day and they're on fire."
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 04:53 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
This post has been edited by woody: Oct 3 2008, 04:54 PM -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 06:28 PM
Post
#14
|
|
 Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
-"Famous Person"
wtf? Worst ad ever. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2008, 07:59 PM
Post
#15
|
|
 GORILLA FLUFFER  Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
--------------------  QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded. Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!! |
|
|
|
|
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th September 2025 - 09:28 AM |
