![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 ![]() |
In California, cell phone early termination fees have been made illegal. The article is linked below. Read it. It's not long at all. It offers both sides of the argument. Two points to discuss: 1) Would you rather have expensive phones and no contract termination fees or would you rather have the fees and subsidized phone prices and 2) do you think it should be a state or federal issue?
I think it should be a federal issue for the reasons the article mentioned, but I don't know what I feel about the first question. Anyways, discuss. http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/null/99655 |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 ![]() |
I think telecommunications is largely under federal domain, so this too should probably be a federal issue.
I would rather have expensive phones and no fees, because consumer complaints would probably end up driving prices down anyway and it would get rid of this ridiculous hardware-lockin crap. I'd much prefer for phone selection to be independent of carrier selection. -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 ![]() |
I believe I saw something very recently that said the FCC laid the smackdown on one of the major carriers over invalid charges for early termination.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 6,906 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Austin Member No.: 9 ![]() |
You mean the FCC might actually be useful for something?
![]() -------------------- |
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 ![]() |
I know I read a better article on it, but here's one I found:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9967344-7.html QUOTE Early termination fees for wireless cell phone contracts came under fire during a Federal Communications Commission hearing Thursday as commissioners examined an industry-backed proposal that could soften the blow of these fees for some consumers. The FCC held the hearing to gather more information as it considers a proposal that would give new cell phone customers a 30-day grace period to cancel their contracts without penalty. After those 30 days, early termination charges would then be prorated or reduced over the duration of the contract. I know I saw where verizon or AT&T or someone lost a big lawsuit by the FCC over early termination fees. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Lubbock, TX Member No.: 20 ![]() |
You mean the FCC might actually be useful for something? ![]() I was able to get a refund from Sprint for their(and all other cell companies) sneaky "new phone activation" charge. Just filed a formal complaint to the FCC and within a couple weeks, Sprint was calling me to let me know that it would be credited back to my account. -------------------- Beers that I have had, updated July 5th, 2009: 1,548
My Beer List "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" - Samuel Johnson "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ" - Mahatma Gandhi |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd October 2025 - 07:51 AM |