IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> You can teach faith, it just has to be our faith
Aaron
post Jun 9 2008, 02:06 PM
Post #16





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 9 2008, 03:02 PM) *
It's not like the n-word at all. It's the Constitution of the United States.


Obviously, I was talking about the kind of argument... not the topic of the argument.

But good to know you're such an ardent defender of *cue dramatic music* the United States Constitution.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jun 9 2008, 02:10 PM
Post #17





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



hmmmk... sorry I had to bring a petty thing like LAW into the logic
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jun 9 2008, 02:15 PM
Post #18





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 9 2008, 03:10 PM) *
hmmmk... sorry I had to bring a petty thing like LAW into the logic


Right, because the people who gave that presentation were promptly arrested afterwards because they broke a law.

Oh, wait, no... a bunch of soccer moms just got pissed because, damnit, they're the only ones who can indoctrinate their children with religion.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jun 9 2008, 03:05 PM
Post #19





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



Hey if double standards in our schools are ok with you I got no further beef.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Jun 9 2008, 03:05 PM
Post #20





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Aaron @ Jun 9 2008, 03:15 PM) *
Oh, wait, no... a bunch of soccer moms just got pissed because, damnit, they're the only ones who can indoctrinate their children with religion.


Um, yeah. Isn't that the argument for not teaching religion in school? Parents should be the ones teaching religion, it isn't the responsibility of the school or groups the school brings in.

We didn't learn religion when I was in elementary and middle school. We learned about geography and culture, but religion was not in the mix.

Hell, I think I have my old textbooks, I'll get them out and see what they say about the Crusades.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jun 9 2008, 03:31 PM
Post #21





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Hartmann @ Jun 9 2008, 04:05 PM) *
Um, yeah. Isn't that the argument for not teaching religion in school? Parents should be the ones teaching religion, it isn't the responsibility of the school or groups the school brings in.


Um, yeah. I was being sarcastic.

Awesome.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nickluto
post Jun 9 2008, 03:41 PM
Post #22


The Transient Aggie


Group: Members
Posts: 546
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 21



QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 9 2008, 12:13 PM) *
You can expose young people to Arabic culture without having an Islamic presentation. Just like you could have an American culture discussion over there without discussing Christianity. Or a Chinese culture discussion without Buddhism.

I say it's hypocrisy (not necessarily what you said) because the second you have anything Christian enter a school, the pundits cry about separation of church and state. Then you have some other religion, be it Islam or Buddhism or anything else, and suddenly it's ok because it's "cultural". That's the hypocrisy. It's called a double-standard. And it seems to be happening all too often nowadays.

I recall having "multi-cultural" days in school, where we'd have a big presentation set up discussing various cultures, arabic, chinese, mexican, french, german, etc. There'd be food from different cultures, pictures of people's homes, talks of their way of life, etc. But I don't in any of those times recall someone stepping forward to teach the lesson that "Allah is God of all people". That's not a multicultural lesson, that's a religious lesson.


nicely put


--------------------


A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jun 9 2008, 06:44 PM
Post #23





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



Was bored at work today. Don't really give a shit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Jun 9 2008, 08:06 PM
Post #24


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



I am agnostic and I'm against this presentation because there needs to be uniformity in the way separation of church and state is interpreted. Don't allow members of a group that has an obvious slant and agenda to lecture on a religious subject whether they be Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, etc. I have no problem with religion being taught in social studies or other courses as long as it is relevant to the subject. Then again I was not at the lecture personally so i don't know to what extent they may have overstepped their "bounds".


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Aaron
post Jun 9 2008, 09:10 PM
Post #25





Group: Members
Posts: 556
Joined: 22-February 06
Member No.: 16



Psh, agnostic. Shit or get off the pot, man!

innocent.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spectatrix
post Jun 9 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #26





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



QUOTE (The Fanatic @ Jun 9 2008, 09:06 PM) *
I am agnostic and I'm against this presentation because there needs to be uniformity in the way separation of church and state is interpreted. Don't allow members of a group that has an obvious slant and agenda to lecture on a religious subject whether they be Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Buddhist, etc. I have no problem with religion being taught in social studies or other courses as long as it is relevant to the subject. Then again I was not at the lecture personally so i don't know to what extent they may have overstepped their "bounds".

I agree. And I think this is where Impala is coming from. The double standard is BS.


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FORSAKENR320
post Jun 9 2008, 09:38 PM
Post #27


GORILLA FLUFFER
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 7,711
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lubbock
Member No.: 50



teachers have to be certified to teach certain classes, right? teach religion, but have it done by a certified teacher. fuck the nosy parent and zealot approach


--------------------
QUOTE (Jessica @ May 7 2007, 01:15 PM) *
but yeehaw dammit. YEEHAW
QUOTE (Dogmeat @ Jun 26 2008, 07:51 PM) *
ok once upon a time I jacked myself off retarded.


Licking anuses, one kindergarten class at a time!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Jun 9 2008, 09:42 PM
Post #28





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



one of the philosophy classes i took as an elective was world religion, great class, forget the prof's name. that's how i could see it being taught in schools (if it's taught at all).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Hartmann
post Jun 9 2008, 09:47 PM
Post #29





Group: Admin
Posts: 3,403
Joined: 23-February 06
From: PDX/TXL
Member No.: 35



QUOTE (Aaron @ Jun 9 2008, 04:31 PM) *
Um, yeah. I was being sarcastic.

Awesome.


Hard to tell on the interweb.


--------------------

"There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The Fanatic
post Jun 9 2008, 10:19 PM
Post #30


Do they ignore parts of reality?


Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,935
Joined: 23-February 06
From: South Overton!!!
Member No.: 46



QUOTE (Aaron @ Jun 9 2008, 10:10 PM) *
Psh, agnostic. Shit or get off the pot, man!

innocent.gif



Hahaha

Actually though I grow tired of fanatics on both sides of the issue. A higher power, force, god, etc is plausible but maybe the universe is a cruel accidental joke. I believe that if there is a higher power it is impossible to define with religion.


--------------------
A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?

-Philip K. Dick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th May 2026 - 11:50 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com