![]() ![]() |
Mar 29 2006, 10:50 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (Lancifer @ Mar 29 2006, 09:37 AM) well, myself and others could program and reproduce the facebook code in less than one month for 10k the thing that makes facebook worth 750 million to 1 billion dollars is it's huge base of millions of people in the 18-25 age range this range is the hardest for advertisers to reach, and having a website that millions of people in this age group visit at least once a day is worth 1 billion to advertisers not to mention that as new kids go to college the facebook base automatically renews itself, it's every advertisers wet dream you're not thinking about this from a business perspective 1 billion i can understand, 2 billion is ridiculous yeah but code has nothing to do with it. code never has anything to do with this type of stuff. nobody ever invents some revolutionary new code, it's basically just who comes up w/a catchy name and gets millions to view their site. What i'm askin is why 1 billion is acceptible and 2 billion is outrageous |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2006, 11:17 AM
Post
#17
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
1 billion is only 250 million dollars more than 750 million (what one company already offered)
i could see another media company upping their offer by 250 million just to reap all the advertising benefits what i can't see is a company doubling that and paying 2 billion, the money would be better spent on r&d, making their own site, and advertising it on tv |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2006, 05:17 PM
Post
#18
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
QUOTE (Lancifer @ Mar 29 2006, 11:17 AM) 1 billion is only 250 million dollars more than 750 million (what one company already offered) i could see another media company upping their offer by 250 million just to reap all the advertising benefits what i can't see is a company doubling that and paying 2 billion, the money would be better spent on r&d, making their own site, and advertising it on tv so you think the first and only offer so far should be the correct offer? if that was true half the shit that gets sold on this forum would go for $5. and creating your own site and advertising it is stupid, the whole point is the facebook already has however many millions of people looking at it a day. do you think all those crazy people who spent hours and hours on end creating their profiles and uploading pics will want to do it all over again? |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2006, 06:23 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
yeah, but a television add is cheaper.
2 billion dollars is way too fucking much money. and what are you talking about if you can pay 1 billion ...why not 2? I dont know if you noticed but we are talking about an additional BILLION (not million...BILLION) dollars. |
|
|
|
Mar 29 2006, 06:25 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
impala needs to work on his reading comprehension skills
|
|
|
|
Mar 30 2006, 01:02 AM
Post
#21
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 2,499 Joined: 23-February 06 From: El Paso Texas Member No.: 32 |
seriously...
i'm 24 make 30+K per year $750M and would make me happy $2B i would prolly end up giving a shit load of it away fuck if i made that site i'd take $50M -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 30 2006, 01:09 AM
Post
#22
|
|
![]() ROCKPACALYPSE NOW Group: Members Posts: 1,519 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Dallas, TX Member No.: 13 |
QUOTE (Lancifer @ Mar 29 2006, 09:37 AM) well, myself and others could program and reproduce the facebook code in less than one month for 10k the thing that makes facebook worth 750 million to 1 billion dollars is it's huge base of millions of people in the 18-25 age range this range is the hardest for advertisers to reach, and having a website that millions of people in this age group visit at least once a day is worth 1 billion to advertisers not to mention that as new kids go to college the facebook base automatically renews itself, it's every advertisers wet dream you're not thinking about this from a business perspective 1 billion i can understand, 2 billion is ridiculous To say code is one thing, but to get into the infrastructure necessary to support such an insanely busy domain - that what would probably be rather expensive in itself. I'm curious how much money the developers are making currently. I thought I heard that the site was created by a small group of people- but who knows how many make up the facebook team by now. -------------------- QUOTE (Lance) now we have some dude from argentina wondering how to fuck dogmeat |
|
|
|
Mar 30 2006, 09:13 AM
Post
#23
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
QUOTE (Rocky @ Mar 30 2006, 01:09 AM) To say code is one thing, but to get into the infrastructure necessary to support such an insanely busy domain - that what would probably be rather expensive in itself. I'm curious how much money the developers are making currently. I thought I heard that the site was created by a small group of people- but who knows how many make up the facebook team by now. The team is still fairly small, you can read occasional postings about the happenings at Facebook at this guy's site: http://avalonstar.com He is the visual guy and sometimes has post about different things at Facebook. I believe I read an article that the infrastructure is similar to Google's philosophy, keep it cheap and continue to expand. Google's server room is a collection of old and new servers and when more power is needed, another server is plugged in. I doubt Facebook has more than 20-25 servers with a few database servers. -------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 12:14 PM
Post
#24
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,403 Joined: 23-February 06 From: PDX/TXL Member No.: 35 |
-------------------- "There is a level of cowardice lower than that of the conformist: that of the fashionable non-conformist." |
|
|
|
Sep 21 2006, 01:29 PM
Post
#25
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,761 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Lubbock/Dubai Member No.: 57 |
QUOTE (Hartmann @ Sep 21 2006, 12:14 PM) and facebook would suck even more -------------------- bored...so i did this
http://beerlist.wetpaint.com/ |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th August 2026 - 03:54 PM |