The Great Global Warming Swindle Options

[Dogmeat]

thats actually very true. the internet is a HUGE resource for setting up rides and keeping in touch!

wow. that's like ... "Hey! Let's use the internet to live vicariously through our alter-egos too!"

I can't believe how lame people are

[Testm0nkey]

i believe it! ive met you before

[Dogmeat]

The only thing in life bigger than my cock is my carbon footprint!

[Epic]

why is the arguing stopping? I was for sure that we were going to resolve this world-wide scientific dispute right here.

[Dogmeat]

why is the arguing stopping? I was for sure that we were going to resolve this world-wide scientific dispute right here.

no, we lost, cathryn already saved the world and $1.00 clean gas is on the way and stuff.

[chook]

do a little math, and all 600 million cars on the planet just contributed 1/858,000th of the atmosphere. or, 0.0000011655 % or, roughly one millionth of a percent.
"exponential negative expansion"? come on now. how did they "prove" that there was/is a "hole the size of australia" in the atmosphere, and that it was due to our CFC emissions?

They showed that there was an anti-correlation to ClO and O3 in the atmosphere. Cat is totally correct with the reaction including Cl as the catalyst. It eventually travels down to the lower atmosphere, as it usually more dense when it combines with other elements. We actually have less O3 up there than 10 years ago, and still losing the amount, but the trend is going up. So yeah Chuck, you did question cat.

On carbon emissions, its what we worry about because its the largest amount of crap we put out. Its def a bad product, but we do not know if its effects are actually significant to cause the current changes and well as its contributions to the total. Global Warming proponents push it because of its large numbers and it seems overwhelming to the every day person. I do worry about the other crap our cars and industry put out. I do not know if smelting nickel for a Prius is worse than driving a H2. People do need to drive more efficient cars, recycle and be more conscious about their world. But consciousness should be coupled with education. Eric would know tons more than myself about global climates and Hartmann about world economics. No one can be an expert on everything.

[impala454]

They showed that there was an anti-correlation to ClO and O3 in the atmosphere. Cat is totally correct with the reaction including Cl as the catalyst. It eventually travels down to the lower atmosphere, as it usually more dense when it combines with other elements. We actually have less O3 up there than 10 years ago, and still losing the amount, but the trend is going up. So yeah Chuck, you did question cat.

Come on though Chuck it can't be that simple. If the whole thing could be explained away by two equations we wouldn't be sitting here arguing about it. Obviously we have smog layers around major cities, but how does the smog layer here over houston cause the temperature to rise in the rain forest? And if ozone is on an upward trend is that because of some legislation based crackdown or some other cause? How is the ozone coming back?

On carbon emissions, its what we worry about because its the largest amount of crap we put out. Its def a bad product, but we do not know if its effects are actually significant to cause the current changes and well as its contributions to the total. Global Warming proponents push it because of its large numbers and it seems overwhelming to the every day person. I do worry about the other crap our cars and industry put out. I do not know if smelting nickel for a Prius is worse than driving a H2. People do need to drive more efficient cars, recycle and be more conscious about their world. But consciousness should be coupled with education. Eric would know tons more than myself about global climates and Hartmann about world economics. No one can be an expert on everything.

That's what really bugs me is the whole playing on numbers as a scare tactic. Obviously have a more fuel efficient car is a good thing, but moreso simply because it's cheaper than because of some environmental concerns we hardly understand yet. I also would rather see vehicles that are truly more efficient. Not just these cars with tiny engines and 800-1000 lbs lighter. I'd love to see a big 6,000 lb truck with 300hp that gets 40mpg.

Honestly I'm in the middle ground as far as who I believe. I just hate hearing environmental junkies who read a few websites and think they have the science figured out and spread the scare that we're about to destroy ourselves and start massive movements to change federal law. while the real scientists basically say that we don't really fully understand what's going on yet.

[impala454]

http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/387743.html
Damn global warming, causing record snowfalls in April!

[impala454]

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5736103.html

By pioneering the science of seasonal hurricane forecasting and teaching 70 graduate students who now populate the National Hurricane Center and other research outposts, William Gray turned a city far from the stormy seas into a hurricane research mecca.

But now the institution in Fort Collins, Colo., where he has worked for nearly half a century, has told Gray it may end its support of his seasonal forecasting.

As he enters his 25th year of predicting hurricane season activity, Colorado State University officials say handling media inquiries related to Gray's forecasting requires too much time and detracts from efforts to promote other professors' work.

But Gray, a highly visible and sometimes acerbic skeptic of climate change, says that's a "flimsy excuse" for the real motivation — a desire to push him aside because of his global warming criticism.

The guy has been a respected hurricane activity forecaster for 25 years and now the media is not going to use his forecasts anymore because the guy is a global warming skeptic. Yay media! Good news is bad news!

[chook]

Come on though Chuck it can't be that simple. If the whole thing could be explained away by two equations we wouldn't be sitting here arguing about it. Obviously we have smog layers around major cities, but how does the smog layer here over houston cause the temperature to rise in the rain forest? And if ozone is on an upward trend is that because of some legislation based crackdown or some other cause? How is the ozone coming back?

Ozone has to do with UV intensity and nothing to do with smog or global temp. Here is how the cycle works.
O2 is in the upper atmosphere, it gets hit with certain frequency of photons that causes the oxygens to split and become free raticle. The Lone oxygen combines with O2 to form Ozone. Ozone absorbs many different frequencies becuase it exist as a congagated compound. Congagated compounds have electrons that may exist in several different states, so they can absorb different frequencies of photons. O2 can only exist in about 6 states, with only one being really common, so it can essentially only absorb one frequency of photons.

What happens is that Chlorine combines with oxygen and makes it take less initial energy for O3 to chage to O2.

after awhile O2 is left in the upper atmosphere and Cl comes back down to lower atmosphere. O3 is regenerated by sunlight, but its a slow process.

[impala454]

So if we're seeing an upward swing in ozone then we've pretty much already corrected that particular problem. Or at least, reversed it.

[Dogmeat]

No one can be an expert on everything.

Except me, because I utilize the NeoConservative Anal Butt Plug of Knowledge and Power to empower me to know everything all the while denouncing people who admit they masturbate to the same pornography I do because God is on my side!

[Hartmann]

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/5736103.html

The guy has been a respected hurricane activity forecaster for 25 years and now the media is not going to use his forecasts anymore because the guy is a global warming skeptic. Yay media! Good news is bad news!

From a side of people that so adamantly proclaim that we should question everything and find truth, I think it's interesting that they want to silence this guy.

What they should be telling people is "question everything... well, except for what we tell you, because we know everything"

[Testm0nkey]

when something is true eventually people have to do something about the nay sayers. just like in the south people had to finally run the KKK out of political positions (tehe)

btw you all enjoying the Climate Change PSA's on every major network and cable station? for example the ones with newt gingrich and nancy polosi saying its time to work together against global climate change

[impala454]

when something is true eventually people have to do something about the nay sayers.

It's not the media's job to decide what's true. It's their job to present the facts. Although that is about laughable nowadays.

just like in the south people had to finally run the KKK out of political positions (tehe)

That's gotta be the worst analogy ever...

btw you all enjoying the Climate Change PSA's on every major network and cable station? for example the ones with newt gingrich and nancy polosi saying its time to work together against global climate change

I'm not enjoying them any more than the politicians participating in the ads are. You really think they all believe what they're saying or just that it's good publicity?