![]() ![]() |
Mar 1 2008, 12:47 PM
Post
#91
|
|
![]() Oh baby bring me down Group: Agents Posts: 4,115 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Way out yonder Member No.: 68 |
SO... WHAT? NOW I'M THE 3RD WHEEL? Only on this trike of LOVE!! for dogmeat http://www.zombietime.com/berkeley_marines_2-12-2008/ -------------------- Southern Rock, beer and bears!
![]() |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 05:10 PM
Post
#92
|
|
![]() From Atlantis to Interzone Group: Global Moderators Posts: 2,512 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Somewhere in space and time Member No.: 65 |
I am curious how many on the boards have: 1) Read Marx and Engels 2) Actually comprehend everything they were saying. I have to admit that I can claim (1) but not entirely (2). 1) yes 2) Well, I understand what they were saying from a sociological standpoint (former Soc major). -------------------- Holy shit, pebkac, you're awesome! "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." - Theodor Seuss Geisel (AKA Dr. Seuss) "An idea that is not dangerous is unworthy of being called an idea at all." - Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
Mar 1 2008, 07:21 PM
Post
#93
|
|
![]() GORILLA FLUFFER Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
Only on this trike of LOVE!! GIGGITY GIGGITY I CAN LIVE WITH THAT -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 02:56 AM
Post
#94
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
You're oversimplifying in that you believe that communism and mainly socialism have but one definition...no subsets, no divisions, no scales...just one definition. That is wrong. That's not what I said at all. Read post #61 for the umpteenth time. I don't understand why you keep skewing what I clearly said and then call me wrong. Newsflash: WE ARE SAYING THE SAME DEFINITIONS, JUST WITH DIFFERENT WORDS |
|
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 02:57 AM
Post
#95
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
|
|
|
|
Mar 2 2008, 03:41 AM
Post
#96
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
hell a WoW degree prob would be worth more than poli sci lolz sure thing. *page from Impala's playbook* QUOTE newsflash: Communism is a form of socialism. and before you come back with it (and I know you would) no, I did not just say socialism = communism. note the difference. Socialism has a state. Communism does not. Read post # blah blah blah for the "umpteenth time" as well to see where I said you're oversimplifying definitions. All I am saying it that the definitions are not quite that simple or black-and-white for these two very complex political terms -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 10:46 AM
Post
#97
|
|
![]() Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
The communist ideology and connotation has been corrupted by Leninism and Stalinism. While originally Marx's notion of the communism form of government as Zach has pointed out was the ultimate goal of men and parties who called themselves socialists, communists, or international worker's groups. The only problem now is that there has been quite a blending of many different economic, political, and sociological backgrounds in the formation of new "gray" states that can not be categorized quite so easily. A prime example of this is the people's republic of China which was formed out of the core beliefs of stalinism and agrarian communist principles, yet today it is dominated by a capitalist globalized economy. Culture can better explain why the principles of Marx differed from one nation to another. When Marx's principles were applied in western europe they were done so democratically because of the route and history that those states had established in determining the proper socio economic reforms needed to better the people. In places like China and Russia (Russia with it's history of reactionary totalitarian tsarist regimes and China with it's history of emperor worship, huge imperial bureaucracies, and corruption) led these nations to corruptly and in most cases incorrectly apply the concepts of Marx and Engels through massive economic reforms aimed at quickly establishing an industrial capitalist economy. Being as Capitalism was a necessary part of the economic evolution to the eventual communist utopia, these agrarian peasant economies were "forced" to displace and kill millions in order to achieve their goals. To conclude, I would argue that while originally both terms were synonymous, in that socialism was a natural precursor and step (as zach said) to the communist "utopia", these terms do not accurately represent the original ideology set forth. Today, most socialists reject the notion of the "utopia" set forth by Marx realizing that socialist principles of economic redistribution and equality can be achieved within a capitalist framework. Also, communist can no longer be described from a purely philosopical or politcal framework without mentioning the corruption that is Stalinism. So while I would argue that both system came from the same ideology they are no longer synonymous and invoke very different political, social, and economic institutions.
-------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 11:23 AM
Post
#98
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
lolz sure thing. *page from Impala's playbook* Socialism has a state. Communism does not. Read post # blah blah blah for the "umpteenth time" as well to see where I said you're oversimplifying definitions. All I am saying it that the definitions are not quite that simple or black-and-white for these two very complex political terms Ironic that you can say the defintions are not quite that simple or black-and-white, and in the same post define them with seven words total. |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 01:47 PM
Post
#99
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
Ironic that you can say the defintions are not quite that simple or black-and-white, and in the same post define them with seven words total. You don't get it, and you refuse to get it/will continue to refuse understanding the point others and myself are trying to make. And Spivey hit the nail on the head with an f'n sledgehammer. Right on! -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 01:53 PM
Post
#100
|
|
![]() DEATH TO ....something? Group: Members Posts: 5,618 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Parker, CO Member No.: 55 |
I want to see a CuddleWrestling match between zach and impala to see if impala can cuddle with zacn until he turns republican and if zach can cuddle with impala until he turns democrat
-------------------- I r Ur Gawd!
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:07 PM
Post
#101
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
I want to see a CuddleWrestling match between zach and impala to see if impala can cuddle with zacn until he turns republican and if zach can cuddle with impala until he turns ... I'm not aligned with any party, as I have states a billion times before. I've voted Republican, Independent, and Libertarian many time before in past elections. ...but I'll still cuddle. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:08 PM
Post
#102
|
|
![]() GORILLA FLUFFER Group: Agents Posts: 7,711 Joined: 23-February 06 From: lubbock Member No.: 50 |
You don't get it, and you refuse to get it/will continue to refuse understanding the point others and myself are trying to make. And Spivey hit the nail on the head with an f'n sledgehammer. Right on! notice how impala has ignored spivey's post completely, where as he NORMALLY breaks te post down and tries to attack each little part....... -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:10 PM
Post
#103
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
notice how impala has ignored spivey's post completely, where as he NORMALLY breaks te post down and tries to attack each little part....... I know, right. His MO is AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAZING. heh BTW: Mess sets came in the mail. They are nice! -------------------- |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 02:28 PM
Post
#104
|
|
![]() New son Donovan Charles Mummert born July 17, 2008 Group: Members Posts: 8,635 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Port Wentworth, GA Member No.: 15 |
You know what I think is funny.... y'all bitch about Impala and how he is arrogant and whatnot then he stops posting and everyone is like WAHHHH WHERE DID IMPALA GO and then he comes back and everyone is bitching again.
LOLERCOPTER |
|
|
|
Mar 3 2008, 03:28 PM
Post
#105
|
|
![]() Do they ignore parts of reality? Group: Moderators Posts: 2,935 Joined: 23-February 06 From: South Overton!!! Member No.: 46 |
I like Impala. I always enjoy a good argument.
-------------------- A psychotic world we live in. The madmen are in power. How long have we known this? Faced this? And--how many of us do know it? Perhaps if you know you are insane then you are not insane. Or you are becoming sane, finally. Waking up. I suppose only a few are aware of all this. Isolated persons here and there. But the broad masses... what do they think? All these hundreds of thousands in this city, here. Do they imagine that they live in a sane world? Or do they guess, glimpse, the truth...?
-Philip K. Dick |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th August 2026 - 12:20 PM |