IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Clemens, ordeal
What do you think?
Which one of these fits?
Clemens did steroids [ 6 ] ** [66.67%]
Clemens did not do steroids and his trainer cooperated in a lie w/the investigation to avoid prison. [ 3 ] ** [33.33%]
Other (explain) [ 0 ] ** [0.00%]
Total Votes: 9
Guests cannot vote 
chook
post Feb 13 2008, 11:01 PM
Post #31


Oh baby bring me down
Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,115
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Way out yonder
Member No.: 68



I don't care about Clemens, but that Filipino girl Anabel looks really damn good.


--------------------
Southern Rock, beer and bears!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blaarg
post Feb 14 2008, 05:40 AM
Post #32





Group: Members
Posts: 926
Joined: 2-May 07
Member No.: 1,015





So 18% of America believes that Clemens didn't do...

However, the surprising thing is that 43% thinks that BOTH of them are lying? Can someone explain to me how this is possible. They think that Clemens denial is false, but they also think that the guy saying Clemens used steroids is false. So what exactly IS the third option?!

Oh yeah this was taken off of cnn.com


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
theIncredibleEdi...
post Feb 14 2008, 07:21 AM
Post #33





Group: Members
Posts: 1,566
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 66



What's funny is the testimony that McNamee gave Clemens' wife HGH for that Sports Illustrated cover shoot....which Clemens disapproved of. *rolls eyes*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
impala454
post Feb 14 2008, 10:16 AM
Post #34





Group: Members
Posts: 10,620
Joined: 23-February 06
From: Houston, TX
Member No.: 48



QUOTE (blaarg @ Feb 14 2008, 05:40 AM) *
However, the surprising thing is that 43% thinks that BOTH of them are lying? Can someone explain to me how this is possible.

The question they asked is a little too general. McNamee did lie, to the new york times, to other media outlets, etc about not having any evidence. That's what that stupid senator called him out on. Was it a lie? Yeah, but obviously he did it to try to protect the players. McNamee has not lied at all to the commitees (at least it doesn't appear that he did). You're not required by law to tell the truth to some stupid newspaper.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
blaarg
post Feb 16 2008, 03:35 PM
Post #35





Group: Members
Posts: 926
Joined: 2-May 07
Member No.: 1,015



An interesting (albeit poorly worded) article about Clemens/McNamee's grilling by the congressional committee:

http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-daniel...,4095370.column


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th May 2026 - 06:35 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com