IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> Time Warner trial - charging based on bandwidth usage
Spectatrix
post Jan 18 2008, 04:06 PM
Post #1





Group: Admin
Posts: 6,906
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Austin
Member No.: 9



Time Warner sucks (so does Beaumont). I'll stick with my Grande Communications service. "8 Mbps" (really 12+, based on the speed tests I've taken) for $40/mo. Booya.

QUOTE
Now, one cable company is starting to push back at excessive bandwidth usage caused mainly by video downloading. After an internal memo was leaked, Time Warner Cable confirmed it's planning a trial in Beaumont, Tex., in which it will charge Internet subscribers based on usage.


http://blogs.moneycentral.msn.com/topstock...ernet-fees.aspx

This post has been edited by Spectatrix: Jan 18 2008, 04:08 PM


--------------------
QUOTE (pebkac @ Oct 14 2006, 03:15 PM) *
You and your logic.

QUOTE (Foamy)

http://xkcd.com/386/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Divergent Realit...
post Jan 20 2008, 09:34 AM
Post #2



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



there will be no drop in fees for the 'light' user.

there will still be the 40-whatever access fee, then you will pay based on how much bandwith you use.

sucks for lots of people that just do a lot on the computer.

a stupid action rather than improving their ability to deal with more users wanting more bandwith.

it will be like old aol - pay by the minute.

after a while someone with enough capital will say fuck that, and start an unlimited usage provider.

and the pendulum will swing back.


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 10th August 2026 - 11:17 PM
Skin made by: skeedio.com