Nov 12 2007, 11:05 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Nov 13 2007, 05:44 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 29-September 07 Member No.: 2,499 |
What will probably happen is that the supreme court will only focus its decision on Washington DC, since it is a federal territory and not a state. Unfortunately, this will most likely not apply to the states.
|
|
|
|
Nov 13 2007, 08:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 20-February 07 Member No.: 721 |
What will probably happen is that the supreme court will only focus its decision on Washington DC, since it is a federal territory and not a state. Unfortunately, this will most likely not apply to the states. Yeah, they won't. I can't see why this supreme court would make such broad change applying to states when this is a federal matter. They already say that states don't have to follow the 2nd amendment since its a federal rule and not incorporated to the states... don't know why they would change that for this case. -------------------- |
|
|
|
Watchman 2nd amendment about to get tested in the supreme court Nov 12 2007, 11:05 AM
THECHICKEN QUOTE US right to bear arms may get its day in cou... Nov 12 2007, 11:07 AM
TTUAthleticTrainer As we can see by that hick road rage video in the ... Nov 12 2007, 11:09 AM
FORSAKENR320 QUOTE (TTUAthleticTrainer @ Nov 12 2007, 11... Nov 12 2007, 12:21 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 9th November 2026 - 05:55 PM |