Will vs. Billy debate, split from other thread Options

[Billy]

Not even going to take a stab at it, huh jonathan?

Well, I guess that saves us both a load of time. There is no point in arguing with someone who cannot understand the very words you use to argue with.

I guess I would like, for once, to have a debate on techsans that is a collection of arguments and counter arguments and then possibly a conclusion.

Instead of what really happens. An argument is made. A counter argument is made that had nothing to do with the original argument. A post is made hopelessly trying to explain, in different words, what the original argument was. Time is wasted. Petty definitions are argued. Both parties get annoyed at one another and insults are exchanged.



It is ok to understand, but disagree. It is not ok to disagree because you don't understand.

This post has been edited by jonathan83: Oct 21 2007, 09:24 PM

[THECHICKEN]

This thread amuses me.

If in need of a topic i can give you one im doing over both immigration and soldiers (soldiers' families being deported).

But billy is going to claim mental superiority immediately upon posting and no true "argument" will be given. Billy will further go into constant statements that nothing that he writes can be comprehended... and then act as though that makes him SMARTER or a better debater.

[Jim]

This thread amuses me.

If in need of a topic i can give you one im doing over both immigration and soldiers (soldiers' families being deported).

But billy is going to claim mental superiority immediately upon posting and no true "argument" will be given. Billy will further go into constant statements that nothing that he writes can be comprehended... and then act as though that makes him SMARTER or a better debater.

Pirate