IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )


> mexican flag, on top
Divergent Realit...
post Oct 10 2007, 11:28 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Agents
Posts: 4,026
Joined: 23-February 06
From: lu-bok
Member No.: 41



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nal3RP9il3A

a video of what happened when a mexican flag was flown above an american flag.


--------------------
32-bit whore


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Erik B.
post Oct 12 2007, 06:30 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 142
Joined: 25-February 06
From: Saint Louis, MO
Member No.: 81



I've been looking and I haven't found any law that states that a flag can't fly above the American flag. I did find the executive order regarding the display of flags.

It says:
When flags of two or more nations are displayed, they are to be flown from separate staffs of the same height. The flags should be of approximately equal size. International usage forbids the display of the flag of one nation above that of another nation in time of peace.

It also says:
The flag should be displayed on all days, especially on... (insert list of federal holidays, etc. here.


So if we're going by this, then I'm breaking the law right now because I'm not flying the flag, when the executive order specifically says that it should be flown on ALL DAYS.

I also found this interesting tidbit:
All ... details of the flag are dealt with by Executive Order. This orders is only binding on the Executive Department of the federal government. It has no binding effect on any civilian, or, for that matter, on any other department of the federal government, nor on any State governments or their subdivisions. the text of the Executive order may be seen here.


Any law outlining how the flag MUST be displayed would be a violation of the 1st amendment, would it not?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jonathan83
post Oct 13 2007, 02:06 AM
Post #3





Group: Moderators
Posts: 2,558
Joined: 22-February 06
From: Seoul, South Korea
Member No.: 28



QUOTE (Erik B. @ Oct 12 2007, 07:30 PM) *
I've been looking and I haven't found any law that states that a flag can't fly above the American flag. I did find the executive order regarding the display of flags.

It says:
When flags of two or more nations are displayed, they are to be flown from separate staffs of the same height. The flags should be of approximately equal size. International usage forbids the display of the flag of one nation above that of another nation in time of peace.

It also says:
The flag should be displayed on all days, especially on... (insert list of federal holidays, etc. here.
So if we're going by this, then I'm breaking the law right now because I'm not flying the flag, when the executive order specifically says that it should be flown on ALL DAYS.

I also found this interesting tidbit:
All ... details of the flag are dealt with by Executive Order. This orders is only binding on the Executive Department of the federal government. It has no binding effect on any civilian, or, for that matter, on any other department of the federal government, nor on any State governments or their subdivisions. the text of the Executive order may be seen here.
Any law outlining how the flag MUST be displayed would be a violation of the 1st amendment, would it not?

haha, amazing what google will find
QUOTE
according to Federal Law it is illegal as outlined in the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10:

§175. Position and manner of display:

© No other flag or pennant should be placed above or, if on the same level, to the right of the flag of the United States of America, except during church services conducted by naval chaplains at sea, when the church pennant may be flown above the flag during church services for the personnel of the Navy. No person shall display the flag of the United Nations or any other national or international flag equal, above, or in a position of superior prominence or honor to, or in place of, the flag of the United States at any place within the United States or any Territory or possession thereof.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Erik B.
post Oct 13 2007, 02:13 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 142
Joined: 25-February 06
From: Saint Louis, MO
Member No.: 81



QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Oct 13 2007, 03:06 AM) *
haha, amazing what google will find


I'm quoting this from a government website, which I assume would have an official status. This is written in explanation of the text you quoted, Title 36, Chapter 10.

The Code is designed 'for the use of such civilian groups of organizations as may not be required to conform with regulations promulgated by one or more executive departments' of the federal government, such as the armed forces. The Flag Code does not prescribe any penalties for non-compliance nor does it include enforcement provisions. Rather, it functions as a guide to be voluntarily followed by civilians and civilian groups.

While the Code empowers the President of the United States to alter, modify, repeal or prescribe additional rules regarding the Flag, no federal agency has the authority to issue 'official' rulings legally binding on civilians or civilian groups. Consequently, different interpretations of various provisions of the Code may continue to be made. The Flag Code may be fairly tested: 'No disrespect should be shown to the Flag of the United States of America.' Therefore, actions not specifically included in the Code may be deemed acceptable as long as proper respect is shown.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Divergent Reality   mexican flag   Oct 10 2007, 11:28 PM
- - Jim   Nice. Way to go wetbacks.   Oct 10 2007, 11:33 PM
- - cmac   it's a flag. loser. lets fight.   Oct 11 2007, 08:31 AM
|- - cupcake   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 11 2007, 09:31 AM) it...   Oct 11 2007, 08:33 AM
- - Fedor   That dude has a sweet beard.   Oct 11 2007, 08:39 AM
- - cmac   laws over fabric are pointless.   Oct 11 2007, 08:43 AM
|- - cupcake   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 11 2007, 09:43 AM) laws...   Oct 11 2007, 08:53 AM
|- - Forum Warrior   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 11 2007, 09:43 AM) laws...   Oct 11 2007, 05:09 PM
- - lamont's lament   fucking mexicans no comment because no speak engl...   Oct 11 2007, 05:33 PM
- - Erik B.   I've been looking and I haven't found any ...   Oct 12 2007, 06:30 PM
|- - jonathan83   QUOTE (Erik B. @ Oct 12 2007, 07:30 PM) I...   Oct 13 2007, 02:06 AM
|- - Erik B.   QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Oct 13 2007, 03:06 AM...   Oct 13 2007, 02:13 PM
- - FORSAKENR320   FLY THAT   Oct 12 2007, 07:34 PM
- - pysex   Oh yeah. And cmac...it's not just because it ...   Oct 13 2007, 06:12 AM
- - cmac   i know. a flag doesn't mean anything to me. it...   Oct 13 2007, 09:22 AM
|- - FORSAKENR320   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 13 2007, 10:22 AM) i kn...   Oct 13 2007, 05:10 PM
- - impala454   Yeah go to some black ghetto neighborhood and fly ...   Oct 13 2007, 10:37 AM
- - cmac   haha. yep. still fabric.   Oct 13 2007, 10:54 AM
|- - Oasis   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 13 2007, 11:54 AM) haha...   Oct 13 2007, 07:15 PM
- - impala454   sweet... make sure you videotape yourself doin thi...   Oct 13 2007, 12:58 PM
- - cmac   it's still fabric but i definitely know that t...   Oct 13 2007, 04:54 PM
- - cmac   yep. not sheltered though. i have street smar...   Oct 13 2007, 05:12 PM
|- - FORSAKENR320   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 13 2007, 06:12 PM) yep....   Oct 13 2007, 05:19 PM
- - TetraGrammaton Cleric   I think that our procedural inadequacies are not w...   Oct 13 2007, 05:19 PM
|- - FORSAKENR320   QUOTE (TetraGrammaton Cleric @ Oct 13 2007, 0...   Oct 13 2007, 05:21 PM
- - TetraGrammaton Cleric   QUOTE (FORSAKENR320 @ Oct 13 2007, 06:21 ...   Oct 13 2007, 05:26 PM
|- - FORSAKENR320   QUOTE (TetraGrammaton Cleric @ Oct 13 2007, 0...   Oct 13 2007, 05:29 PM
- - cmac   true. i understand. i'm not patriotic so th...   Oct 13 2007, 07:56 PM
|- - Oasis   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 13 2007, 08:56 PM) true...   Oct 13 2007, 08:17 PM
||- - jonathan83   QUOTE (Oasis @ Oct 13 2007, 09:17 PM) Nei...   Oct 14 2007, 01:08 PM
||- - Oasis   QUOTE (jonathan83 @ Oct 14 2007, 02:08 PM...   Oct 14 2007, 01:20 PM
|- - jonathan83   QUOTE (cmac @ Oct 13 2007, 08:56 PM) true...   Oct 14 2007, 01:07 PM
- - Jim   Patriotism isn't standing blindly behind an ad...   Oct 13 2007, 11:14 PM
- - jonathan83   ok yeah, i can agree with that   Oct 14 2007, 03:11 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th August 2026 - 08:52 AM
Skin made by: skeedio.com