Sep 12 2007, 09:28 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
not sure when we'll actually start seein em, but it's some pretty crazy stuff. i know they use OLED screens for some phones and small devices. check out this vid (and yeah it's wesley crusher
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Ufs9Wx0VXQ |
|
|
|
![]() |
Sep 13 2007, 08:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
Haha, JRock comes flying into the thread out of nowhere trying to school Impala and I on economics but only comes out looking like a complete idiot.
Of course demand is going to be high for these TVs (as you said), but you fail to realize that competition between the major TV manufacturers will drive the price down. Using your example let's say it takes $10 to produce an OLED TV. JRock starts manufacturing OLED TVs and marking them up to $200. Impala then realizes that JRock is marking up his products ridiculously high so he starts manufacturing OLED TVs for $10 too but sells them for $150 instead. Then I decide to jump in on the action and sell my OLED TVs for only $100. Pretty soon JRock realizes he isn't selling any TVs because other companies are undercutting him so he has to lower his prices too. Competition is fundamental to Capitalism and calling it an "unforeseen force" shows how little of a grasp on economics you have. In America and other capitalist countries competition is a fact and never unforeseen. If a company comes out with a good product SOMEONE is going to copy it and compete, plain and simple. There are enough TV manufacturers out there competing to drive the price down just like the prices on LCDs and Plasmas were driven down. Granted, when the first OLED TVs come out they will be jacked up high as hell but the profit margin the companies make will soon fall due to competition and settle around the 15-20% markup point that TV manufacturers make on Plasmas/LCDs today. The prices on OLED TVs will definitely be cheaper. In case you still fail to understand here's a real world here and now example. DLP is a new TV technology and cheaper to produce than LCDs/Plasmas. On average the equivalent DLP TV to it's LCD/Plasma brothers will cost you at least 20% less. You sir, are a moron. Thank you, come again. |
|
|
|
Sep 13 2007, 09:21 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 660 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 22 |
Haha, JRock comes flying into the thread out of nowhere trying to school Impala and I on economics but only comes out looking like a complete idiot. Of course demand is going to be high for these TVs (as you said), but you fail to realize that competition between the major TV manufacturers will drive the price down. Using your example let's say it takes $10 to produce an OLED TV. JRock starts manufacturing OLED TVs and marking them up to $200. Impala then realizes that JRock is marking up his products ridiculously high so he starts manufacturing OLED TVs for $10 too but sells them for $150 instead. Then I decide to jump in on the action and sell my OLED TVs for only $100. Pretty soon JRock realizes he isn't selling any TVs because other companies are undercutting him so he has to lower his prices too. Competition is fundamental to Capitalism and calling it an "unforeseen force" shows how little of a grasp on economics you have. In America and other capitalist countries competition is a fact and never unforeseen. If a company comes out with a good product SOMEONE is going to copy it and compete, plain and simple. There are enough TV manufacturers out there competing to drive the price down just like the prices on LCDs and Plasmas were driven down. Granted, when the first OLED TVs come out they will be jacked up high as hell but the profit margin the companies make will soon fall due to competition and settle around the 15-20% markup point that TV manufacturers make on Plasmas/LCDs today. The prices on OLED TVs will definitely be cheaper. In case you still fail to understand here's a real world here and now example. DLP is a new TV technology and cheaper to produce than LCDs/Plasmas. On average the equivalent DLP TV to it's LCD/Plasma brothers will cost you at least 20% less. You sir, are a moron. Thank you, come again. How am I an idiot, you basically totally agreed with my post but typed everything out like it's different. I mentioned that there will be competition and what I meant by "unforeseen force" is that it was not taken into account in my example. Reading comprehension ftw? I hadn't seen you two economists mention competition, so I thought someone should. Just because Vizio makes cheap flat screen TV's I don't see Sony dropping all of their prices in a panic to compete. There are different price points that different manufacturers try to push. Sony will put a big price tag on theirs and always leave it higher than the bargain price points to appeal to the snobs and fanboi's. And just because one person drops their price doesn't mean that everybody follows. One company can make $100 by selling 10 products at $10 each while the other makes $100 by selling 5 at $20 each. First you and Impala are trying to say that OLED's are going to come out and everybody's going to have one and nobody's going to buy LCD's and Plasmas anymore. Now all of a sudden you're changing your stance and saying that they're going to be expensive at first and go down eventually (which is exactly what I said in my post). Way to stick to your guns, Hilary. DLP is not really that new, they've been out for years now, so naturally they're going to be cheaper. I never said that OLED's are always going to be the most expensive TV's, I said that they're not going to be released at a lower price point than other technology, which you and Impala were trying to say they would be. I remember about 5 years ago when DLP's were hitting the retail stores and a 50" cost over $8,000. Any technology is going to get cheaper with time, but they're not going to miss an opportunity at making mad profits the first few years. If DLP's are so cheap to make, why were they so expensive to begin with instead of being so cheap right off the bat? Oh yeah BECAUSE IT WAS NEW FUCKING TECHNOLOGY! Just give up, you don't know what you're talking about. I don't even know why I'm arguing since you've already changed your stance and basically agreed with me in a non-agreeing way. -------------------- LANCE IS PRO-CENSORSHIP! HE IS CENSORING MY LOVE FOR THE LORD!
|
|
|
|
impala454 OLED TVs Sep 12 2007, 09:28 AM
1up the technology has been around since at least 2000... Sep 12 2007, 09:52 AM
impala454 from what i've read it's not out yet becau... Sep 12 2007, 10:01 AM
Jessica needless to say, its still pretty fucking sweet lo... Sep 12 2007, 10:34 AM
impala454 yeah once they get the lifespan issues figured out... Sep 12 2007, 03:05 PM
zetec wil wheaton is the shit, and so are OLED tvs. the ... Sep 12 2007, 03:10 PM
1up lifespan problems aren't the only issue, there... Sep 12 2007, 03:12 PM
impala454 well when people start seein $$ signs le... Sep 12 2007, 03:31 PM
1up $$ is exactly why there ARE legal issues Sep 12 2007, 03:32 PM
impala454 but you cant make money if the shit dont work Sep 12 2007, 03:34 PM
1up the shit does work, the underlying technology is h... Sep 12 2007, 03:39 PM
impala454 QUOTE (1up @ Sep 12 2007, 04:39 PM) the s... Sep 12 2007, 03:45 PM
1up My bad, I was confusing OLED TVs with SED (Surface... Sep 12 2007, 03:47 PM
pysex QUOTE (1up @ Sep 12 2007, 04:47 PM) My ba... Sep 12 2007, 06:34 PM
impala454 QUOTE (pysex @ Sep 12 2007, 07:34 PM) Sou... Sep 12 2007, 06:49 PM
pysex QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 12 2007, 07:49 PM)... Sep 12 2007, 08:41 PM
impala454 well i have to be wrong first! heh
i think i... Sep 12 2007, 03:53 PM
impala454 profit doesn't imply high end user cost. it i... Sep 12 2007, 08:56 PM
pysex QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 12 2007, 09:56 PM)... Sep 12 2007, 09:05 PM
impala454 well we're still quite a ways off from OLED TV... Sep 12 2007, 09:11 PM
pysex QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 12 2007, 10:11 PM)... Sep 12 2007, 09:12 PM
1up LMAO you don't think plasmas/LCDs would disapp... Sep 12 2007, 09:14 PM
impala454 QUOTE (1up @ Sep 12 2007, 10:14 PM) and b... Sep 12 2007, 09:43 PM
pysex wtf are you talking about...
No fucking company ... Sep 12 2007, 09:24 PM
1up QUOTE (pysex @ Sep 12 2007, 10:24 PM) wtf... Sep 13 2007, 10:18 AM

JRockTTU QUOTE (1up @ Sep 13 2007, 11:18 AM) You... Sep 13 2007, 08:41 PM
impala454 QUOTE (pysex @ Sep 12 2007, 10:24 PM) If ... Sep 13 2007, 10:27 AM
chook my mp3 player uses Oleds, just not the full color ... Sep 12 2007, 11:42 PM
pysex Ok so I didn't know it had a short life span
... Sep 13 2007, 01:59 PM
lamont's lament having to replace a tv even every 10 years is bull... Sep 13 2007, 07:51 PM
JRockTTU This thread is frustrating. I agree with you, Ale... Sep 13 2007, 08:36 PM
pysex When and IF OLED's come out on to the market, ... Sep 13 2007, 09:25 PM
1up In your first post you said OLED TVs will come out... Sep 13 2007, 09:28 PM
zetec you'll probably have to replace them, yes, but... Sep 13 2007, 11:09 PM
impala454 I think what JRock doesn't realize is that TVs... Sep 14 2007, 08:10 AM
pebkac QUOTE (impala454 @ Sep 14 2007, 09:10 AM)... Sep 14 2007, 11:00 PM
impala454 well i know markup back like 8 years ago when i wo... Sep 15 2007, 09:38 AM
zetec QUOTE (pebkac @ Sep 15 2007, 12:00 AM) TV... Sep 20 2007, 02:55 PM
Spectatrix Sure it is; it's just an etymologically incorr... Sep 20 2007, 03:29 PM
zetec from your own site:
QUOTE irregardless
an errone... Sep 21 2007, 03:35 PM
impala454 QUOTE (zetec @ Sep 21 2007, 04:35 PM) fro... Sep 21 2007, 03:53 PM
pebkac I plan to use the word anyway irregardless. Sep 21 2007, 03:44 PM
impala454 Samsung has come out with 31" OLED at the lat... Mar 6 2008, 01:52 PM
Oasis A TV attached to a stripper's pole.
SWEET Mar 6 2008, 01:54 PM
impala454 Looks like LG is going to begin mass production of... Apr 24 2008, 10:22 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th August 2026 - 06:31 AM |