Aug 10 2007, 10:03 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,275 Joined: 22-February 06 Member No.: 2 |
according to this dipshit: http://www.philly.com/dailynews/columnists...other_9_11.html
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Aug 13 2007, 03:12 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
as long as it takes
what do you think? |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2007, 04:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Why so serious? Group: Global Moderators Posts: 5,286 Joined: 22-February 06 From: Fate, TX Member No.: 4 |
as long as it takes what do you think? "As long as it takes." If you're going to call Glen a 'democratic candidate' with what he said then you are just another douchebag republican candidate with that statement. I still hold by my original belief on the war: we should never have gone in. So we invaded because Saddam was killing his people? Well, where are the 130,000 soldiers that we need to send to Africa? Not going to turn this into another Iraq bitch fest. Done. so do you think if the entire area was stablized that would be good for america? ha! define "stabilized"? -------------------- |
|
|
|
Aug 13 2007, 04:38 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
"As long as it takes." If you're going to call Glen a 'democratic candidate' with what he said then you are just another douchebag republican candidate with that statement. because that's the only logical answer, unless you know of some time machine I haven't heard about. name a war where the countries went in and publicly defined a time table for pulling out, broadcast to everyone (including their enemies). I still hold by my original belief on the war: we should never have gone in. that's wonderful, but it wasn't the question. the question is how long do we stay since we're there. my allusion of the other guy to a democratic candidate was in reference to their uncanny ability to completely ignore the question put to them. "we shouldn't be there" doesn't answer the question. So we invaded because Saddam was killing his people? no, we invaded iraq because we had intelligence showing they had weapons of mass destruction, and because saddam refused to abide by UN regulations requiring him to allow weapons inspectors in. Not going to turn this into another Iraq bitch fest. Done. oh come on sure you are |
|
|
|
1up we need another 9/11 Aug 10 2007, 10:03 AM
impala454 what a douchebag Aug 10 2007, 11:33 AM
James He means well, but his methods aren't exactly ... Aug 10 2007, 11:43 AM
Oasis That's like saying we need another Holocaust t... Aug 12 2007, 09:47 PM
FORSAKENR320 QUOTE (Oasis @ Aug 12 2007, 10:47 PM) Tha... Aug 12 2007, 09:53 PM
RitalinJunkie To me it seems like the guy is just saying it the ... Aug 12 2007, 11:41 PM
impala454 well this country was completely and totally spoil... Aug 13 2007, 09:17 AM
Psykopath QUOTE (impala454 @ Aug 13 2007, 10:17 AM)... Aug 13 2007, 02:53 PM
impala454 QUOTE (Psykopath @ Aug 13 2007, 05:34 PM)... Aug 13 2007, 04:39 PM
Inferia Define acceptable. Aug 13 2007, 03:23 PM
RitalinJunkie QUOTE (Inferia @ Aug 13 2007, 04:23 PM) D... Aug 13 2007, 03:48 PM
impala454 QUOTE (RitalinJunkie @ Aug 13 2007, 04:48... Aug 13 2007, 03:54 PM
RitalinJunkie QUOTE (impala454 @ Aug 13 2007, 04:54 PM)... Aug 13 2007, 04:20 PM
impala454 so do you think if the entire area was stablized t... Aug 13 2007, 04:32 PM
rabble we need a national draft so that this shit finally... Aug 13 2007, 04:34 PM
RitalinJunkie I agree with zack on that.....if we are going to s... Aug 13 2007, 04:43 PM
impala454 I've already said it (although you might have ... Aug 13 2007, 04:50 PM
THECHICKEN Africa would me much harder to justify and be succ... Aug 13 2007, 05:29 PM
chook i'd say 10 years it would stabilize, but it wo... Aug 14 2007, 07:33 PM
FORSAKENR320 crater the middle east.
set fire to africa.
if i... Aug 15 2007, 04:12 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2026 - 08:32 AM |