10 Politically Incorrect Truths about Human Nature Options

[Dogmeat]

I found this to be interesting....

http://www.psychologytoday.com/artic...622-000002.xml

However, this particular part of the article kinda fuels my thought about how sociologists are generally idiots:


Quote:
Relative to monogamy, polygyny creates greater fitness variance (the distance between the "winners" and the "losers" in the reproductive game) among males than among females because it allows a few males to monopolize all the females in the group. The greater fitness variance among males creates greater pressure for men to compete with each other for mates. Only big and tall males can win mating opportunities. Among pair-bonding species like humans, in which males and females stay together to raise their children, females also prefer to mate with big and tall males because they can provide better physical protection against predators and other males.

That is the biggest pile of horse shit I've ever heard. If that was the case I'd get laid so much it'd just be fucking retarded

[Testm0nkey]

women when on their periods are more prone to seek out or evaluate macho, big tall stereotype men as attractive. but when not on their periods women value sensitivity, caring, inner strength and companionship

women want to get their breed on when in heat with meat heads. when its important and in the long run they want to be with serious dudes

look up the study if you care for a source

but times are changing. women dont need physical protection anymore. they need what is also related to evolution, security, companionship and trust. what good is a man to a breeding women if hes going to knock her up and not help her out when shes pregnant (in the past evolutionary sense). a pregnant woman is pretty defenseless