Jun 1 2007, 07:46 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 1,591 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 31 |
I'm looking for some feedback on my Web site. In every aspect. Let me hear good, bad, and ugly. Aesthetics and content. Give it to me. Thanks.
Web site -------------------- Don't sweat the petty, pet the sweaty.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
Jun 2 2007, 09:47 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 10,620 Joined: 23-February 06 From: Houston, TX Member No.: 48 |
I like that it's simple. The non-white background is easy on the eyes, you picked a good, clear font. I like that you went to the trouble of getting the little icons that go with the sites you linked, and made them all the same size. I like when people put links within the content for items a layperson may not understand.
you may want to work on the layout a little so that it stretches the text when the browser is a different size, rather than it just throwing out more blank space. you could also create a page sized background for your page to fit on, if you want the page to display at a specific size. also if you grab the right side of the browser and bring it in, the text ends up squeezed against the left side of the page. lastly I think maybe your header graphic is a little on the large side, and maybe your nav links could be redone a little, as they're just kinda floating way off to the right in that huge space. oh and i'm not real sure what it's doing, but every time I click a nav link or on the initial site visit, it asks me seven times whether I want to accept a cookie for this site (normally I just click block all, but I thought you may like to know how many times it did that). very good start though, definitely the type of site I like, simple. edit: and you're pretty brave putting that much detailed contact info up for all to see |
|
|
|
cmac Web site critique Jun 1 2007, 07:46 PM
FORSAKENR320 too plain. professional, yes. but so simple it l... Jun 1 2007, 08:27 PM
pebkac QUOTE (FORSAKENR320 @ Jun 1 2007, 09:27 P... Jun 3 2007, 03:56 PM
cmac i was going for professional. i agree with the pl... Jun 1 2007, 09:00 PM
FORSAKENR320 QUOTE (cmac @ Jun 1 2007, 10:00 PM) i was... Jun 1 2007, 10:21 PM
cmac i'll look at some new color schemes.
anyone ... Jun 2 2007, 04:14 PM
TetraGrammaton Cleric from a composition prospective:
fused sentences a... Jun 2 2007, 04:21 PM
cmac any specific area? or all over? Jun 2 2007, 06:08 PM
cmac good stuff. thanks.
what is the cookie called?
... Jun 3 2007, 01:08 PM
impala454 not sure, didn't accept any of them. page sti... Jun 3 2007, 03:14 PM
FORSAKENR320 what can i say, i got an eye for the essentric Jun 3 2007, 08:15 PM
Hartmann Just a personal preference but I would keep the li... Jun 4 2007, 07:43 AM
impala454 do you linux and mac losers have tahoma? just cur... Jun 4 2007, 08:26 AM
Hartmann QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 4 2007, 09:26 AM) ... Jun 4 2007, 08:39 AM
impala454 QUOTE (Hartmann @ Jun 4 2007, 09:39 AM) I... Jun 4 2007, 07:28 PM
Hartmann QUOTE (impala454 @ Jun 4 2007, 08:28 PM) ... Jun 5 2007, 09:46 AM
cmac my mac does.
default. Jun 4 2007, 08:26 PM
zetec ubuntu's big hardon is that absolutely EVERYTH... Jun 6 2007, 11:11 PM
impala454 ok? Jun 7 2007, 08:30 AM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th August 2026 - 04:45 PM |